skip to main content
10.1145/2502081.2502198acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Relative spatial features for image memorability

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent studies in image memorability showed that the memorability of an image is a measurable quantity and is closely correlated with semantic attributes. However, the intrinsic characteristics of memorability are not yet fully understood. It has been reported that in contrast to a popular belief unusualness or aesthetic beauty of the image may not be positively correlated with the image memorability. This counter-intuitive characteristic of memorability hinders a better understanding of image memorability and its applicability. In this paper, we investigate two new spatial features that are closely correlated with the image memorability yet intuitively explainable. We propose the Weighted Object Area (WOA) that jointly considers the location and size of objects and the Relative Area Rank (RAR) that captures the relative unusualness of the size of objects. We empirically demonstrate their useful correlation with the image memorability. Results show that both WOA and RAR can improve the memorability prediction. In addition, we provide evidence that the RAR can effectively capture object-centric unusualness of size.

References

  1. A. C. Berg, T. L. Berg, H. Daumé III, J. Dodge, A. Goyal, X. Han, A. Mensch, M. Mitchell, A. Sood, K. Stratos, and K. Yamaguchi. Understanding and Predicting Importance in Images. In CVPR, IEEE Intl. Conf. on, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. T. F. Brady, T. Konkle, G. A. Alvarez, and A. Oliva. Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. PNAS, 105(38):14325--14329, September 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. C.-C. Chang and C.-J. Lin. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2:27:1--27:27, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. N. Dalal and B. Triggs. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In CVPR, IEEE Intl. Conf. on, volume 1, pages 886 --893 vol. 1, june 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Dhar, V. Ordonez, and T. L. Berg. High Level Describable Attributes for Predicting Aesthetics and Interestingness. In CVPR, IEEE Intl. Conf. on, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. P.F. Felzenszwalb, R.B. Girshick, D. McAllester, and D. Ramanan. Object Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part-Based Models. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 32(9):1627 --1645, sept. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. J. Hwang and K. Grauman. Reading between the Lines: Object Localization Using Implicit Cues from Image Tags. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 34(6):1145--1158, June 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P. Isola, D. Parikh, A. Torralba, and A. Oliva. Understanding the Intrinsic Memorability of Images. In NIPS 24, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. P. Isola, J. Xiao, A. Torralba, and A. Oliva. What makes an image memorable? In CVPR, IEEE Intl. Conf. on, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Khosla, J. Xiao, A. Torralba, and A. Oliva. Memorability of Image Regions. In NIPS 25, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. T. Konkle, T. F. Brady, G. A. Alvarez, , and A. Oliva. Scene Memory Is More Detailed Than You Think: The Role of Categories in Visual Long-Term Memory. Psychological Science, 21(11):1551--1556, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. S. Lazebnik, C. Schmid, and J. Ponce. Beyond bags of features: Spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In CVPR, IEEE Intl. Conf. on, volume 2, pages 2169 -- 2178, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Oliva and A. Torralba. Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. Int. J. Comput. Vision, 42(3):145--175, May 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. E. Shechtman and M. Irani. Matching local self-similarities across images and videos. In CVPR, IEEE Intl. Conf. on, pages 1--8, june 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Xiao, J. Hays, K. A. Ehinger, A. Oliva, and A. Torralba. SUN Database: Large-scale Scene Recognition from Abbey to Zoo. In CVPR, IEEE Intl. Conf. on, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Relative spatial features for image memorability

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          MM '13: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia
          October 2013
          1166 pages
          ISBN:9781450324045
          DOI:10.1145/2502081

          Copyright © 2013 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 October 2013

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • poster

          Acceptance Rates

          MM '13 Paper Acceptance Rate47of235submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          MM '24
          MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
          October 28 - November 1, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader