skip to main content
10.1145/2503859.2503877acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesisdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The comprehensive performance analysis of striped disk array organizations - RAID-0

Published:11 July 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks version RAID-0 is a block-stripped disk array without redundancy. This paper provides results of RAID-0 performance examination when compared to a single disk drive. Particular emphasis is put on how the number of disks in the RAID 0 configuration influences the performance results. The presented analysis relies on setting up the analytical model of a single disk based on M/G/1 queue and in the same manner defining analytical model for the file system access time. Finally, we have set up an analytical model for the RAID-0 workload related to four specific types of RAID performances. We have defined three types of workloads, generally dominated by relatively small objects. Test results have shown a superior behaviour of RAID-0 when compared to a single drive and a significant performance enhancement as the number of disks increases. All benchmark results are interpreted based on a mathematical model.

References

  1. Seltzer M. et al. 2000. Journaling versus Soft Updates: Asynchronous Meta-data Protection in File Systems. USENIX Conf. Proc., San Diego, 71--84. (2000) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Tweedie S. 2000. EXT3. Journaling Filesystem. (2000)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mathur A. et al. 2007. The new ext4 filesystem: current status and future plans. Proceedings of the Linux Symposium, Ottawa, Ontario Canada. (2007)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Roderick W. S. 2008. Migrating to Ext4. DeveloperWorks, IBM,Available: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-ext4/(2008)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ext4 Howto. 2011. Available: https://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext4_Howto#Bigger_File_System_and_File_Sizes (2011)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. First benchmarks of ext4. 2006. Available: http://www.linuxinsight.com/first_benchmarks_of_the_ext4_file_system.html (2006)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dodiu E. et al. 2010. Hard-Soft Real-Time Performance Evaluation of Linux RTAI Based Embedded Systems System, Elektronika Ir Elektrotechnika 8(104), 13--18. (2010)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Djordjevic B., Timcenko V. 2012. Ext4 File System in Linux Environment: Features and Performance Analysis. Int. Journal of Computers. Vol. 6, No. 1, 37--45. (2012)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Akpinar O., Altiok T. 2006. Performance Analysis of the Disk Subsystem, Rutgers, The State Univ. of New Jersey Industrial and Systems Engineering, NJ, 08854. (2006)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. DiskSim Website at Carnegie Mellon University. Available: http://www.pdl.cmu.edu/DiskSim/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuratti A. et al. 1995. Performance Analysis of the RAID 5 Disk Array, Computer Performance and Dependability Symposium, Proceedings, International. (1995) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Thomasian A., Xu J. 2008. Reliability and Performance of Mirrored Disk Organizations. Computer Journal. (2008) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Thomasian A., Menon J. 1997. RAID5 Performance with Distributed Sparing, IEEE Trans. on Parallel and Distributed Systems archive, Vol. 8, No. 6. (1997) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Thomasian A. et al. 2007. Analysis of Rebuild Processing in RAID5 Disk Arrays. Computer Journal. (2007) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Thomasian A. 2005. Clustered RAID Arrays and Their Access Costs, Computer Journal. (2005) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Lebrecht A. et al. 2010. Analytical and Simulation Modelling of Zoned RAID Systems. Computer Journal. (2010) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Shriver E. et al. 1998. An analytic behaviour model for disk drives with readahead caches and request reordering, Proc. of the ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modelling of Computer Systems. (1998) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Katcher J. 1997. PostMark. A New File System Benchmark. Technical Report TR3022. Network Appliance Inc. (1997)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The comprehensive performance analysis of striped disk array organizations - RAID-0

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ISDOC '13: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Information Systems and Design of Communication
      July 2013
      149 pages
      ISBN:9781450322997
      DOI:10.1145/2503859

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 July 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate31of63submissions,49%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader