skip to main content
10.1145/2505469.2505472acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

From ground to aerial communication: dissecting WLAN 802.11n for the drones

Published:30 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Micro Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) employed in civil missions are receiving remarkable attention from both research and industry. UAVs embed more and more sensor technology, and their small mounted cameras allow for efficient mapping of large areas in short time. Yet, civil missions such as rescue operations would need a timely delivery of high-resolution images, which calls for high-speed communication such as provided by WLAN IEEE 802.11n. Driven by extensive experiments, the key finding of this contribution is that 802.11n performs poorly in highly mobile and aerial scenarios, as the throughput between UAVs drops far below the theoretical maximum as soon as they become airborne. This is partially caused by the limitations of the embedded hardware, but also a result of the network dynamics of the aerial links. In order to dissect the origins of the low performance figures, we isolate the potential causes of degradation by analyzing our data of throughput, packet loss, aircraft and antenna orientation, and cruise speed. We discuss quantitatively how practical it is to deliver high-resolution images when being exposed to aerial throughput. We believe that it will be a long way until micro UAVs transferring large-size data become reality and argue for a new amendment of IEEE 802.11 addressing the communication among highly-mobile UAVs.

References

  1. IEEE standard for information technology -- telecommunications and information exchange between systems local and metropolitan area networks -- specific requirements part 11: Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D. Aguayo, J. Bicket, S. Biswas, G. Judd, and R. Morris. Link-level measurements from an 802.11b mesh network. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 34(4):121--132, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Asadpour, D. Giustiniano, K. A. Hummel, and S. Heimlicher. Characterizing 802.11n aerial communication. In Proceedings of the second ACM MobiHoc workshop on Airborne networks and communications, ANC '13, pages 7--12, New York, NY, USA. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. L. Duplay. Target detection using flying robots. Technical report, Laboratory of Intelligent Systems (LIS), EPFL, June 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. E. Feo, L. Gambardella, and G. D. Caro. Search and rescue using mixed swarms of heterogeneous agents: Modeling, simulation, and planning. Technical Report IDSIA-05-12, April 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. P. Forret. Megapixel Calculator - digital camera resolution. http://web.forret.com/tools/megapixel.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Heiskala and J. Terry. OFDM wireless LANs: a theoretical and practical guide. SAMS publishing Indianapolis, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. D. Henkel and T. Brown. On controlled node mobility in delay-tolerant networks of unmannned aerial vehicles. In International Symposium on Advance Radio Technologies, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Henkel and T. Brown. Delay-tolerant communication using mobile robotic helper nodes. In Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks and Workshops, 2008. WiOPT 2008. 6th International Symposium on, pages 657--666. IEEE, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. O. Küng, C. Strecha, A. Beyeler, J.-C. Zufferey, D. Floreano, P. Fua, and F. Gervaix. The accuracy of automatic photogrammetric techniques on ultra-light uav imagery. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in Geomatics (UAV-g), Zurich, Switzerland, pages 14--16, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Leven, J. Zufferey, and D. Floreano. A simple and robust fixed-wing platform for outdoor flying robot experiments. In International symposium on flying insects and robots, pages 69--70, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. L. Meier, P. Tanskanen, L. Heng, G. H. Lee, F. Fraundorfer, and M. Pollefeys. Pixhawk: A micro aerial vehicle design for autonomous flight using onboard computer vision. Autonomous Robots, 33(1-2):21--39, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. K. Pelechrinis, T. Salonidis, H. Lundgren, and N. Vaidya. Experimental characterization of 802.11n link quality at high rates. In Fifth ACM international workshop on Wireless network testbeds, experimental evaluation and characterization, WiNTECH '10, pages 39--46, New York, NY, USA. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. T. Rappaport. Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice, 2nd Ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. V. Shrivastava, S. Rayanchu, J. Yoonj, and S. Banerjee. 802.11n under the microscope. In 8th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, pages 105--110. ACM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. I. Tinnirello, D. Giustiniano, L. Scalia, and G. Bianchi. On the side-effects of proprietary solutions for fading and interference mitigation in IEEE 802.11b/g outdoor links. Computer Networks, 53(2):141--152, Feb. 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. E. Yanmaz, R. Kuschnig, and C. Bettstetter. Channel measurements over 802.11 a-based uav-to-ground links. In GLOBECOM 2011 Workshops, pages 1280--1284. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. E. Yanmaz, R. Kuschnig, and C. Bettstetter. Achieving air-ground communications in 802.11 networks with three-dimensional aerial mobility. In INFOCOM 2013. 32nd IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, pages 120--124. IEEE, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. W. Zhao, M. Ammar, and E. Zegura. Controlling the mobility of multiple data transport ferries in a delay-tolerant network. In INFOCOM 2005. 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, volume 2, pages 1407--1418. IEEE, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. From ground to aerial communication: dissecting WLAN 802.11n for the drones

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WiNTECH '13: Proceedings of the 8th ACM international workshop on Wireless network testbeds, experimental evaluation & characterization
        September 2013
        114 pages
        ISBN:9781450323642
        DOI:10.1145/2505469

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 September 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        WiNTECH '13 Paper Acceptance Rate11of26submissions,42%Overall Acceptance Rate63of100submissions,63%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader