skip to main content
10.1145/2505515.2505650acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How do users grow up along with search engines?: a study of long-term users' behavior

Published: 27 October 2013 Publication History

Abstract

With a stronger reliance on search engines in our daily life, a large number of studies have investigated user behavior characteristics in Web search. However, previous studies mainly focus on large-scale query log data and analyze temporal changes based on all users without differentiating different user groups; few have really traced a fixed and long-term group of users and have distinguished the behavior of long-term users from ordinary users to analyze long-term temporal changes unbiasedly. In this paper we look into the interaction logs of these two user groups to analyze differences between these two user groups and to better understand how users grow up along with Web search engines. Statistical and experimental results show that there exist temporal changes of both user groups. There are also significant differences between these two user groups in the frequency of interaction, complexity of search tasks, and query formulation conventions. The findings have implications for how Web search engines should better support users' information seeking process by tackling complex search tasks and complicated query formulations.

References

[1]
Internet World Stats. 2012. World Internet Users and Population Stats. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm.
[2]
Hölscher, C., and Strube, G. 2000. Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies. Computer networks, 33(1), 337--346.
[3]
Silverstein, C., Marais, H., Henzinger, M., and Moricz, M. 1999. Analysis of a very large web search engine query log. In ACM SIGIR Forum (Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 6--12). ACM.
[4]
Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., and Saracevic, T. 2000. Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web. Information processing & management, 36(2), 207--227.
[5]
Jansen, B. J., and Spink, A. 2003. An Analysis of Web Documents Retrieved and Viewed. In International Conference on Internet Computing (pp. 65--69).
[6]
Guy, I., Ur, S., Ronen, I., Weber, S., and Oral, T. 2012. Best faces forward: a large-scale study of people search in the enterprise. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.1775--1784. ACM.
[7]
Spink, A., Ozmutlu, S., Ozmutlu, H. C., and Jansen, B. J. 2002. US versus European Web searching trends. In ACM Sigir Forum (Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 32--38). ACM.
[8]
Chau, M., Fang, X., and Liu Sheng, O. R. 2005. Analysis of the query logs of a web site search engine. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(13), 1363--1376.
[9]
Jansen, B. J., and Spink, A. 2005. An analysis of web searching by European AlltheWeb. com users. Information Processing & Management, 41(2), 361--381.
[10]
Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., and Pedersen, J. 2005. A temporal comparison of AltaVista Web searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(6), 559--570.
[11]
Beitzel, S. M., Jensen, E. C., Chowdhury, A., Frieder, O., and Grossman, D. 2007. Temporal analysis of a very large topically categorized web query log. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 166--178.
[12]
Pang, B., and Kumar, R. 2011. Search in the Lost Sense of "Query": Question Formulation in Web Search Queries and its Temporal Changes. In ACL (Short Papers) (pp. 135--140).
[13]
Kang, R., and Fu, W. T. 2010. Exploratory information search by domain experts and novices. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (pp. 329--332). ACM.
[14]
Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., Blakely, C., and Koshman, S. 2007. Defining a session on web search engines. Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6):862--871.
[15]
White, R. W., and Morris, D. 2007. Investigating the querying and browsing behavior of advanced search engine users. In Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (pp. 255--262). ACM.
[16]
White, R. W., and Drucker, S. M. 2007. Investigating behavioral variability in web search. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web (pp. 21--30). ACM.
[17]
Aula, A., Khan, R. M., and Guan, Z. 2010. How does search behavior change as search becomes more difficult?. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 35--44). ACM.
[18]
Bell, D. J., and Ruthven, I. 2004. Searcher's assessments of task complexity for web searching. In Advances in Information Retrieval (pp. 57--71). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[19]
Broder, A. 2002. A taxonomy of web search. In ACM Sigir forum (Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 3--10). ACM.
[20]
Aula, A. 2003. Query Formulation in Web Information Search. In ICWI (pp. 403--410).

Cited By

View all
  • (2015)MAPerProceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/2806416.2806562(433-442)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2015
  • (2015)What Users Ask a Search EngineProceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/2806416.2806457(1571-1580)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2015

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
CIKM '13: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management
October 2013
2612 pages
ISBN:9781450322638
DOI:10.1145/2505515
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 October 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. interactive degree
  2. query formulation conventions
  3. search task complexity
  4. user behavior analysis
  5. web search engine

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

CIKM'13
Sponsor:
CIKM'13: 22nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
October 27 - November 1, 2013
California, San Francisco, USA

Acceptance Rates

CIKM '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 143 of 848 submissions, 17%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

Upcoming Conference

CIKM '25

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2015)MAPerProceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/2806416.2806562(433-442)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2015
  • (2015)What Users Ask a Search EngineProceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/2806416.2806457(1571-1580)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2015

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media