skip to main content
10.1145/2505515.2507881acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Diversified query expansion using conceptnet

Authors Info & Claims
Published:27 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Search result diversification (SRD) aims to select diverse documents from the search results in order to cover as many search intents as possible. A prerequisite is that the search results contain diverse documents. For this purpose, we investigate a new approach to SRD by diversifying the query. Expansion terms are selected from ConceptNet so as to cover as diverse aspects as possible. The experimental results on several TREC data sets show that our method can outperform the existing state-of-the-art approaches that do not diversify the query.

References

  1. R. Agrawal, S. Gollapudi, A. Halverson, and S. Ieong. Diversifying search results. In Proc. of WSDM, pages 5--14, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. Amati, C. Carpineto, G. Romano, and F. U. Bordoni. Query difficulty, robustness and selective application of query expansion. In Proc. of ECIR, pages 127--137, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. R. A. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. Pearson Education Ltd., 2 edition, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Carbonell, and J. Goldstein. The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In Proc. of SIGIR-98, pages 335--336, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. O. Chapelle, D. Metzler, Y. Zhang and P. Grinspan. Expected reciprocal rank for graded relevance. In Proc. of CIKM, pages 621--630, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. L. A. Clarke, N. Craswell, and I. Soboroff. Overview of the TREC 2009 Web track. In Proc. of TREC, pages 1--9, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C. L. A. Clarke, N. Craswell, I. Soboroff , and G. V. Cormack. Overview of the TREC 2010 Web track. In Proc. of TREC, pages 1--9, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. L. A. Clarke, N. Craswell, I. Soboroff, and E. M. Voorhees. Overview of the TREC 2011 Web track. In Proc. of TREC, pages 1--9, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. C.L.A. Clarke, M. Kolla, G.V. Cormack, O. Vechtomova, A. Ashkan, S. Buttcher, and I. MacKinnon. Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation. In Proc. of SIGIR, pages 659--666, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Coyle, and B. Smyth. On the importance of being diverse: Analysing similarity and diversity in web search. In Proc. of IIP, pages 341--350, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Drosou, and E. Pitoura. Diversity over continuous data. IEEE Data Eng. Bull., vol. 32, no. 4, pages 1--8, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Gollapudi, and A. Sharma. An axiomatic approach for result diversification. In Proc. of WWW, pages 381--390, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M-H. Hsu, and H-H. Chen. Information Retrieval with Commonsense Knowledge. In Proc. of SIGIR, pages 651--652, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M.-H. Hsu, M.-F. Tsai, and H.-H. Chen. Combining wordnet and conceptnet for automatic query expansion: A learning approach. In Proc. of AIRS, pages 213--224, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M.-H. Hsu, M.-F. Tsai, and H.-H. Chen. Query expansion with ConceptNet and WordNet: an intrinsic comparison. In Proc. of AIRS, pages 1--13, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Kotov, and C. Zhai. Tapping into knowledge base for concept feedback: leveraging conceptnet to improve search results for difficult queries. In Proc. of WSDM, pages 403--412, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. R. Krovetz. Viewing morphology as an inference process. In Proc. of SIGIR, pages 191--202, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. T. Lau and E. Horvitz. Patterns of search. Analyzing and modelling web query refinement. In Proc. of ICUM, pages 119--128, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. R. L. T. Santos, C. Macdonald, and I. Ounis. Exploiting query reformulations for web search result diversification. In Proc. of WWW, pages 881--890, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R.L.T. Santos, C. Macdonald, I. Ounis. On the role of novelty for search result diversification. In Information Retrieval, pages 478--502, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. R. L. T. Santos, J. Peng, C. Macdonald, and I. Ounis. Explicit search result diversification through sub-queries. In Proc. of ECIR, pages 87--99, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. R. Speer, C. Havasi. Representing General Relational Knowledge in ConceptNet 5, In Proc. of LREC, pages 3679--3686, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. S. Vargas, R. L. T. Santos, C. Macdonald, and I. Ounis. Selecting Effective Expansion Terms for Diversity. In Proc. of OAIR, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. D. Yin, Z. Xue, X. Qi, and B. D. Davison. Diversifying search results with popular subtopics. In Proc. of TREC, pages 1--9, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. C. Zhai, W. W. Cohen, and J. Lafferty. Beyond independent relevance: methods and evaluation metrics for subtopic retrieval. In Proc. of SIGIR, pages 10--17, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. C. Zhai and J. D. Lafferty. A risk minimization framework for information retrieval. In Proc. of Info. Processing and Management, pages 1--9, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Diversified query expansion using conceptnet

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '13: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management
      October 2013
      2612 pages
      ISBN:9781450322638
      DOI:10.1145/2505515

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 October 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      CIKM '13 Paper Acceptance Rate143of848submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader