skip to main content
10.1145/2506095.2506106acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesairConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Optimisation of an Active Remote Centre of Motion Mechanism for Minimal Extracorporeal Workspace for Robotic Surgery

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 July 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Conventional laparoscopic surgical tools penetrate a patient body through a fixed point called trocar point. Surgeons maintain this pivoting point on the patient body with their coordinated hand movements. Mechanism used for achieving this kinematic constraint is known as Remote Centre of Motion (RCM) mechanism and is widely used in surgical robots. Active RCM mechanism will enable positioning the constraint point virtually anywhere within the reach of the linkage. In this work, we present an optimisation strategy for an active RCM to minimise the extracorporeal workspace. The link lengths of the active RCM mechanism have been optimised and the dexterity of the tool has been analysed for various trocar positions. Kinematic analysis of the RCM mechanism, optimisation strategy, and the results of the dexterity analysis are presented.

References

  1. Kuo, Chin-Hsing, Dai, Jian S, and Dasgupta, Prokar. Kinematic design considerations for minimally invasive surgical robots: an overview. The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Volume 8, Issue 2, (2012), Pages 127--145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Locke, Roderick CO and Patel, Rajni V. Optimal remote center-of-motion location for robotics-assisted minimally-invasive surgery. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2007), Pages 1900--1905.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Kuo, Chin-Hsing and Dai, Jian S. Kinematics of a Fully-Decoupled Remote Center-of-Motion Parallel Manipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery. ASME Journal of Medical Devices, Volume 6, Issue 2, (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Jaspers, Joris EN, Bentala, M, Herder, JL, De Mol, BA, and Grimbergen, CA. Mechanical manipulator for intuitive control of endoscopic instruments with seven degrees of freedom. Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies, Volume 13, Issue 3, (2004), Pages 191--198.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Xu, Pei, Jingjun, Yu, and Guanghua, Bi Shusheng Zong. Enumeration and type synthesis of one-DOF remote-center-of-motion mechanisms. In The 12th world congress in mechanism an machine science (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Benoît Herman, Alba Olías López, Catherine Rasse Benoît Raucent. Experimental comparison of kinematics and control interfaces for laparoscope positioners. In 9th National Congress on Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Tsai, YC and Soni, AH. The effect of link parameter on the working space of general 3R robot arms. Mechanism and Machine Theory, Volume 19, Issue 1, (1984), Pages 9--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Deb, K. Optimization for Engineering Design: Algorithm and Example. Prentice-Hall of India Pvt. Ltd, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Khatib, Oussama. A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, Volume 3, Issue 1, (1987), Pages 43--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Schilling, R. J. Fundamentals of Robotics, Analysis and Control. Prentice-Hall, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Optimisation of an Active Remote Centre of Motion Mechanism for Minimal Extracorporeal Workspace for Robotic Surgery

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        AIR '13: Proceedings of Conference on Advances In Robotics
        July 2013
        366 pages
        ISBN:9781450323475
        DOI:10.1145/2506095

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 July 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate69of140submissions,49%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader