skip to main content
10.1145/2507065.2507104acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Icon design for user interface of remote patient monitoring mobile devices

Published:30 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to describe the studies undertaken in order to improve and simplify user interface (UI) design of a Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) device, specifically the BL Healthcare Access Tablet. Current icon designs for UIs of the RPM devices are not well designed to reflect the needs, experiences and limitations of the end-user. Complex and unclear UIs and instructions make compliance with self-management schedules often poor. The issue of compliance, with the need for effective communication between chronic disease patients and healthcare professionals emphasize the need for the appropriate UI and communication technology. Improvement is made from the perspective of the user experience (UX) / UI redesign. Usability studies were conducted, followed by the UI redesign and icons design with the aim to address the UX design. A mobile application concept for the RPM is developed, that could be used on existing tablets and smartphones, thus eliminating the need for the current costly hardware.

References

  1. Black, S. Mobile Telemedicine: A Computing and Networking Perspective, 2008, 161--172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chiang, L. C., Chen, W. C., Dai, Y. T. and Ho, Y. L. The effectiveness of telehealth care on caregiver burden, mastery of stress, and family function among family caregivers of heart failure patients: A quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Suter, P., Suter, W. N. and Johnston, D. Theory-based telehealth and patient empowerment. Population health management, 14, 2, 2011, 87--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Thong, J. Y., Hong, W. and Tam, K. Y. What leads to user acceptance of digital libraries? Communications of the ACM, 47, 11, 2004, 78--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Fraser, H., Kwon, Y. J. and Neuer, M. The Future of Connected Health Devices. Retrieved from touchhealthsciences.com, 2011, 28--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gargiulo, G., Bifulco, P., Cesarelli, M., Jin, C., McEwan, A. and van Schaik, A. Wearable dry sensors with Bluetooth connection for use in remote patient monitoring systems. Studies In Health Technology And Informatics, 161, 2010, 57--65.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Eisenstein, J., Vanderdonckt, J. and Puerta, A. Applying model-based techniques to the development of UIs for mobile computers. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces (Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, 2001). ACM, New York, NY, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dourish, P. Accounting for system behaviour: Representation, reflection and resourceful action. Computers and Design in Context, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1997, 145--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Leonardi, C., Mennecozzi, C., Not, E., Pianesi, F. and Zancanaro, M. Designing a familiar technology for elderly people. Gerontechnology, 7, 2, 2008, 151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Norman, D. The design of future things. 2007. New York: Basic Books, City, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Melenhorst, A.-S., Rogers, W. A. and Caylor, E. C. The use of communication technologies by older adults: exploring the benefits from the user's perspective. SAGE Publications, City, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Battleson, B., Booth, A. and Weintrop, J. Usability testing of an academic library web site: a case study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27, 3, 2001, 188--198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Nielsen, J. a. H., J. T. Usability engineering. Academic press Boston, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Bernard, M. L. Criteria for optimal web design (designing for usability). Retrieved on April, 13, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Bernard, M., Liao, C. H. and Mills, M. The effects of font type and size on the legibility and reading time of online text by older adults. ACM, City, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Sorg, J. A. An Exploratory Study of Type Face, Type Size and Color Paper Preferences Among Older Adults. Pennsylvania State University, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Nielsen, J. and Hackos, J. T. Usability engineering. Academic press Boston, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Rowan, M., Gregor, P., Sloan, D. and Booth, P. Evaluating web resources for disability access. ACM, City, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Nielsen, J. How to conduct a heuristic evaluation. On the World Wide Web, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Malkary, G. Healthcare without Bounds: Trends in Remote Patient Monitoring, April 2006, Spyglass Consulting Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Foley, D., Ancoli-Israel, S., Britz, P. and Walsh, J. Sleep disturbances and chronic disease in older adults: results of the 2003 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America Survey. Journal of psychosomatic research, 56, 5, 2004, 497--502.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Czejdo, B. D. and Baszun, M. Remote patient monitoring system and a medical social network. International Journal of Social and Humanistic Computing, 1, 3, 2010, 273--281.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Icon design for user interface of remote patient monitoring mobile devices

    Recommendations

    Reviews

    Alan M Arnfeld

    Around the world, there is increasing pressure to provide cost-effective medical healthcare. This pressure, combined with increasingly aged populations in many countries, poses important new challenges. One response involves directing specific attention to the delivery of remote patient care, which has resulted in the use of a range of electronic devices by the elderly. These devices provide telehealth services, which are often delivered via a tablet device capable of sophisticated graphical representations and interactions. This paper describes a thorough user experience design and improvement program focused on visual icons for a commercially available remote patient monitoring device. The methodology and findings in this study are likely to be of interest across the telehealth industry and indeed to the wider industry of personal devices. The paper starts with a description of the "before" design, which has been radically changed through multiple usability rounds and refinements of both the icon design and the interaction design framework. There are significant visual changes in the "after" design, creating a strong family of icons with fonts and colors that are more easily distinguishable by the elderly, the target group. Furthermore, the study provides a significant restructuring of the relative importance of different actions to improve the discoverability and speed of access to emergency services appropriate to the user group under study. The methodology is well thought out, and I am particularly pleased to see multiple rounds of usability and redesign within a single project. Online Computing Reviews Service

    Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

    Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGDOC '13: Proceedings of the 31st ACM international conference on Design of communication
      September 2013
      200 pages
      ISBN:9781450321310
      DOI:10.1145/2507065

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 September 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGDOC '13 Paper Acceptance Rate21of38submissions,55%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader