skip to main content
10.1145/2507248.2507253acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A qualitative analysis on the impacts of assured quality internet interconnection

Published:03 November 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Internet interconnection is the glue that holds the Internet together via bilateral network interconnection agreements of best effort (i.e. non-assured) quality. This study provides qualitative analysis and assessment of the multidimensional impacts of the recent proposals of introducing Assured Service Quality (ASQ) in the Internet interconnection (IC) market. The analysis focuses on the impacts in three distinct, though strongly interrelated aspects: Business, Socioeconomic and Regulatory. Methodologically, the impacts are identified through a focus group which involved representatives from 17 European organizations. Exploring how these complementary impacts may affect the ASQ offer is fundamental for envisioning the Internet evolution and for setting appropriate governance policies. This study identifies and discusses the expected impacts, thus shedding light on the key implications of assured quality Internet interconnection.

References

  1. D.Clark, J. Wroclawski, K. Sollins and R. Braden. Tussle in Cyberspace: Defining Tomorrow's Internet. IEEE Transaction on Networking, 13(3): 8--15, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. N. Le Sauze. ETICS: QoS-enabled interconnection for Future Internet Services. In: Proceedings of the Future Network & Mobile Summit 2010, Florence, Italy, June 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Zwickl, P. Reichl and A.Ghezzi. On the Quantification of Value Networks: A Dependency Model for Interconnection Scenarios. In: Springer Verlag (Eds.), Economics of Converged, Internet-Based Networks -- Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2011, Volume 6995/2011, 63--74, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24547-3_7. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Ghezzi. A proposal of Business Model Business Model Design parameters for Future Internet Carriers. In: Springer Verlag (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2012, Volume 7291/2012, 72--79, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30039-4_9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. W. B. Norton. Internet service providers and peering. In Proceedings of NANOG. 19: 1--17, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A.Ghezzi, M. Georgadis, P. Reichl, C. Di-Cairano Gilfedder, R. Mangiaracina, and N. Le-Sauze. Generating Innovative Business Models for the Future Internet. Info, 15(4):43--68, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. AT Kearney.. Internet Value Chain Economics. Research Report. 2010. Available at: http://www.atkearney.com/documents/10192/a70da6a8-aa98-4e43-999b-3a83a58d1c80Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. P. Zwickl, P. Reichl, A. Ghezzi, F.T. Johansen, H. Lønsethagen, M. Georgiades, and C. Di Cairano-Gilfedder. ASQ Meta-Scenarios: A Generalized Approach for Requirements Classification of Interconnection Goods. In proceedings of the CTTE 2011 - 10th Conference of Conference of Telecommunication, Media and Internet Techno-Economics, (Berlin, Germany, 16--18, p. 1--9, May 2011). Print ISBN: 978-3-8007-3348-4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. R.S. Barbour and J. Kitzinger. Developing Focus Group Research, Sage Publications Limited, London, UK, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. T. R. Lindlof, , and B. C. Taylor. Qualitative Communication Research Methods, 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. H. Edmunds. The Focus Group Research Handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. C. Kalogiros, C. Courcoubetis, G.D. Stamoulis, M. Dramitinos, O. and Dugeon. "Socioeconomic Tussles Analysis of the ETICS Approach for Providing QoS-enabled Inter-Domain Services". In: Proceedings of the Future Networks and Mobile Summit, Berlin, October 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. N. Shetty, G.Schwartz and J. Walrand. Modeling the Impact of QoS on Internet User Welfare and ISP Incentives. Working Paper, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P. Reichl, S. Egger, R. Schatz and A.D. Alconzo. The Logarithmic Nature of QoE and the Role of the Weber-Fechner Law in QoE Assessment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications (ICC 2010). 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. T. Hoßfeld, D. Hock, P. Tran-Gia, K. Tutschku, and M. Fiedler. Testing the IQX Hypothesis for Exponential Interdependency between QoS and QoE of Voice Codecs iLBC and G.711. In Proceedings of the 18th ITC Specialist Seminar on Quality of Experience, Karlskrona, Sweden, May 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. L.A. Stole. Price Discrimination and Imperfect Competition. Handbook of Industrial Organization, 3: 34--47, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. A. Odlyzko. Privacy, Economics, and Price Discrimination on the Internet. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Electronic Commerce ICEC '03, pp. 1--12, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. Spector. The strategic Uses of Price Discrimination. In "The Pros and Cons of Price Discrimination". Konkurrensverket, Swedish Competition Authority, March 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. A. Sackl, P. Zwickl and P. Reichl. From Quality of Experience to Willingness to Pay for Interconnection Network Quality. In: Springer Verlag (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2012, Volume 7291/2012, pp. 62--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. H. Von Stackelberg. Marktform und Gleichgewicht (Market Structure and Equilibrium). Vienna, 1934, 1st Edition Translation into English, Bazin, Urch & Hill, Springer 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. C. Courcoubetis, M. Dramitinos and G. D. Stamoulis. Internet Interconnection Assured Quality Services: Issues and Strategic Impact. In FUNEMS 2012, Berlin, p. 1--9, July 2012, Print ISBN: 978-1-4673-0320-0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. N. Economides, and T. Tåg. Revised Net Neutrality on the Internet: A Two-sided Market Analysis. Information Economics and Policy, 24:92--101, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. A. Ghezzi. Revisiting Business Strategy Under Discontinuity. Management Decision, 51(7), 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. C. Dell'Era, F. Frattini and A. Ghezzi. The Role of the Adoption Network in the Early market survival of Innovations: the Italian Mobile VAS Industry. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(1): 118--140, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. A. Ghezzi, M. Cortimiglia, R. Balocco. Mobile Content & Service Delivery Platforms: a technology classification model. Info, 14(2): 72--88, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. A. Ghezzi. Emerging Business Models and Strategies for Mobile Platforms Providers: a Reference Framework. Info, 14(5): 36--56, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. M. Cortimiglia, A. Ghezzi and F. Renga. Mobile Applications and their Delivery Platforms. IT Professional, 13(5): 51--56 , September-October 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. M.Cortimiglia, A. Ghezzi and F. Renga. Social Applications: Revenue Models, Delivery Channels, and Critical Success Factors -- An Exploratory Study and Evidence from the Spanish-Speaking Market. Journal of Theoretical and Applied E-commerce Research, Special Issue on Business Models for Mobile platforms 6( 2): 108--122, August 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A qualitative analysis on the impacts of assured quality internet interconnection

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      PE-WASUN '13: Proceedings of the 10th ACM symposium on Performance evaluation of wireless ad hoc, sensor, & ubiquitous networks
      November 2013
      164 pages
      ISBN:9781450323604
      DOI:10.1145/2507248

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 November 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      PE-WASUN '13 Paper Acceptance Rate12of36submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate70of240submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader