skip to main content
research-article

Computing Stackelberg strategies in stochastic games

Published: 01 December 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Significant recent progress has been made in both the computation of optimal strategies to commit to (Stackelberg strategies), and the computation of correlated equilibria of stochastic games. In this letter we discuss some recent results in the intersection of these two areas. We investigate how valuable commitment can be in stochastic games and give a brief summary of complexity results about computing Stackelberg strategies in stochastic games.

References

[1]
Conitzer, V. and Korzhyk, D. 2011. Commitment to correlated strategies. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). San Francisco, CA, USA, 632--637.
[2]
Conitzer, V. and Sandholm, T. 2006. Computing the optimal strategy to commit to. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC). Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 82--90.
[3]
Jain, M., Kardes, E., Kiekintveld, C., Ordóñez, F., and Tambe, M. 2010. Security games with arbitrary schedules: A branch and price approach. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). Atlanta, GA, USA.
[4]
Jain, M., Kiekintveld, C., and Tambe, M. 2011. Quality-bounded solutions for finite Bayesian Stackelberg games: Scaling up. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS). Taipei, Taiwan, 997--1004.
[5]
ACM SIGecom Exchanges, Vol. 11, No. 2, December 2012, Pages 36--40
[6]
Kiekintveld, C., Jain, M., Tsai, J., Pita, J., Ordóñez, F., and Tambe, M. 2009. Computing optimal randomized resource allocations for massive security games. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS). Budapest, Hungary, 689--696.
[7]
Korzhyk, D., Conitzer, V., and Parr, R. 2010. Complexity of computing optimal Stackelberg strategies in security resource allocation games. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). Atlanta, GA, USA, 805--810.
[8]
Letchford, J. and Conitzer, V. 2010. Computing optimal strategies to commit to in extensive-form games. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC). Cambridge, MA, USA, 83--92.
[9]
Letchford, J., Conitzer, V., and Munagala, K. 2009. Learning and approximating the optimal strategy to commit to. In Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT-09). Paphos, Cyprus, 250--262.
[10]
Letchford, J., MacDermed, L., Conitzer, V., Parr, R., and Isbell, C. 2012. Computing optimal strategies to commit to in stochastic games. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). Toronto, ON, Canada, 1380--1386.
[11]
MacDermed, L., Narayan, K. S., Isbell, C. L., and Weiss, L. 2011. Quick polytope approximation of all correlated equilibria in stochastic games. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). San Francisco, CA, USA.
[12]
Paruchuri, P., Pearce, J. P., Marecki, J., Tambe, M., Ordóñez, F., and Kraus, S. 2008. Playing games for security: An efficient exact algorithm for solving Bayesian Stackelberg games. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS). Estoril, Portugal, 895--902.
[13]
Pita, J., Jain, M., Ordóñez, F., Portway, C., Tambe, M., and Western, C. 2009. Using game theory for Los Angeles airport security. AI Magazine 30, 1, 43--57.
[14]
Pita, J., Jain, M., Ordóñez, F., Tambe, M., and Kraus, S. 2010. Robust solutions to Stackelberg games: Addressing bounded rationality and limited observations in human cognition. Artificial Intelligence 174, 15, 1142--1171.
[15]
Shieh, E., An, B., Yang, R., Tambe, M., Baldwin, C., DiRenzo, J., Maule, B., and Meyer, G. 2012. PROTECT: A deployed game theoretic system to protect the ports of the united states. In International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS).
[16]
Tsai, J., Rathi, S., Kiekintveld, C., Ordonez, F., and Tambe, M. 2009. IRIS - a tool for strategic security allocation in transportation networks. In The Eighth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Industry Track. 37--44.
[17]
von Stengel, B. and Zamir, S. 2010. Leadership games with convex strategy sets. Games and Economic Behavior 69, 446--457.
[18]
Vorobeychik, Y. and Singh, S. 2012. Computing stackelberg equilibria in discounted stochastic games. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI). Toronto, ON, Canada.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Optimal private payoff manipulation against commitment in extensive-form gamesGames and Economic Behavior10.1016/j.geb.2024.11.008149(118-147)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2019)Leadership in Singleton Congestion Games: What is Hard and What is EasyArtificial Intelligence10.1016/j.artint.2019.103177(103177)Online publication date: Sep-2019
  • (2015)Making the Best of Limited Memory in Multi-Player Discounted Sum GamesElectronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science10.4204/EPTCS.193.2193(16-30)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2015
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM SIGecom Exchanges
ACM SIGecom Exchanges  Volume 11, Issue 2
December 2012
42 pages
EISSN:1551-9031
DOI:10.1145/2509002
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 December 2012
Published in SIGECOM Volume 11, Issue 2

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Stackelberg games
  2. stochastic games

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)Optimal private payoff manipulation against commitment in extensive-form gamesGames and Economic Behavior10.1016/j.geb.2024.11.008149(118-147)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2019)Leadership in Singleton Congestion Games: What is Hard and What is EasyArtificial Intelligence10.1016/j.artint.2019.103177(103177)Online publication date: Sep-2019
  • (2015)Making the Best of Limited Memory in Multi-Player Discounted Sum GamesElectronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science10.4204/EPTCS.193.2193(16-30)Online publication date: 23-Sep-2015
  • (2015)A leader–follower partially observed, multiobjective Markov gameAnnals of Operations Research10.1007/s10479-015-1935-0235:1(103-128)Online publication date: 7-Jul-2015
  • (2015)Computation of Stackelberg Equilibria of Finite Sequential GamesWeb and Internet Economics10.1007/978-3-662-48995-6_15(201-215)Online publication date: 30-Dec-2015
  • (2014)Defending Against Opportunistic Criminals: New Game-Theoretic Frameworks and AlgorithmsDecision and Game Theory for Security10.1007/978-3-319-12601-2_1(3-22)Online publication date: 2014

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media