Arto Vihavainen
ABSTRACT
MOOCs (massive open online courses) became a hugely popular topic in both academic and non-academic discussions in 2012. Many of the offered MOOCs are somewhat "watered-down versions" of the actual courses given by the MOOC professors at their home universities. At the University of Helsinki, Department of Computer Science, our MOOC on introductory programming is exactly the same course as our first programming course on campus. Our MOOC uses the Extreme Apprenticeship (XA) model for programming education, thus ensuring that students are proceeding step-by-step in the desired direction. As an additional twist, we have used our MOOC as an entrance exam to studies in University of Helsinki. In this paper, we compare the student achievement after one year of studies between two cohorts: the MOOC intake (n=38) and the intake that started their studies during the fall (n=68). The results indicate that student achievement is at least as good on the MOOC intake when compared to the normal intake. An additional benefit is that the students admitted via MOOC are less likely to drop out from their studies during their first year.
- M. E. Caspersen, K. D. Larsen, and J. Bennedsen. Mental models and programming aptitude. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, volume 39, pages 206--210. ACM, 2007. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- A. Collins, J. Brown, and A. Holum. Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3):6--46, 1991.Google Scholar
- A. Collins, J. Brown, and S. Newman. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In Knowing learning and instruction Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, volume Knowing, l of Psychology of Education and Instruction Series, pages 453--494. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1989.Google Scholar
- T. Crick and S. Sentance. Computing at school: stimulating computing education in the UK. In Proceedings of the 11th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, Koli Calling '11, pages 122--123, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Daniel. Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. 2012. http://www.academicpartnerships.com/docs/default-document-library/moocs.pdf.Google Scholar
- K. Devlin. The future of textbook publishing is us, 2012. http://devlinsangle.blogspot.fi/2012/08/the-future-of-textbook-publishing-is-us.html.Google Scholar
- S. Downes. What is a connectivist MOOC. 2012. http://www.connectivistmoocs.org/what-is-a-connectivist-mooc/.Google Scholar
- G. E. Evans and M. G. Simkin. What best predicts computer proficiency? Commun. ACM, 32(11):1322--1327, Nov. 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Franke, J. Century, M. Lach, C. Wilson, M. Guzdial, G. Chapman, and O. Astrachan. Expanding access to k-12 computer science education: research on the landscape of computer science professional development. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, SIGCSE '13, pages 541--542, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Kinnunen, R. McCartney, L. Murphy, and L. Thomas. Through the eyes of instructors: a phenomenographic investigation of student success. In Proceedings of the third international workshop on Computing education research, ICER '07, pages 61--72, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Kurhila and A. Vihavainen. Management, structures and tools to scale up personal advising in large programming courses. In Proceedings of the 2011 conference on Information technology education, SIGITE '11, pages 3--8. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. McAuley, B. Stewart, G. Siemens, and D. Cormier. The MOOC model for digital practice. 2010. http://davecormier.com/edblog/wp-content/uploads/MOOC_Final.pdf.Google Scholar
- MOOCs@Edinburgh Group. MOOCs @ Edinburgh 2013: Report nr. 1, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6683.Google Scholar
- G. Siemens. What is the theory that underpins our MOOCs? 2012. http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/06/03/what-is-the-theory-that-underpins-our-moocs/.Google Scholar
- Simon, S. Fincher, A. Robins, B. Baker, I. Box, Q. Cutts, M. de Raadt, P. Haden, J. Hamer, M. Hamilton, R. Lister, M. Petre, K. Sutton, D. Tolhurst, and J. Tutty. Predictors of success in a first programming course. In Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Conference on Computing Education - Volume 52, ACE '06, pages 189--196, Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, 2006. Australian Computer Society, Inc. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Vihavainen, M. Luukkainen, and J. Kurhila. Multi-faceted support for MOOC in programming. In Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Information technology education, SIGITE '12, pages 171--176. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Vihavainen, M. Paksula, and M. Luukkainen. Extreme apprenticeship method in teaching programming for beginners. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, SIGCSE '11, pages 93--98. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Vihavainen, T. Vikberg, M. Luukkainen, and M. Pärtel. Scaffolding students' learning using Test My Code. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, ITiCSE '13, pages 117--122, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Wilcox, S. Winn, and M. Fyvie-Gauld. 'It was nothing to do with the university, it was just the people': the role of social support in the first-year experience of higher education. Studies in higher education, 30(6):707--722, 2005.Google Scholar
- C. Wilson, L. A. Sudol, C. Stephenson, and M. Stehlik. Running on empty: The failure to teach k-12 computer science in the digital age. Association for Computing Machinery. 2010.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- MOOC as semester-long entrance exam
Recommendations
A Purposeful MOOC to Alleviate Insufficient CS Education in Finnish Schools
Special Issue II on Computer Science Education in K-12 SchoolsThe Finnish national school curriculum, effective from 2004, does not include any topics related to Computer Science (CS). To alleviate the problem that school students are not able to study CS-related topics, the Department of Computer Science at the ...
Using Learning Analytics to Promote Student Engagement and Achievement in Blended Learning: An Empirical Study
ICEBT '18: Proceedings of the 2018 2nd International Conference on E-Education, E-Business and E-TechnologyThe emergence of blended learning has huge impact on traditional learning. Blended learning has its own unique characteristics combining the advantages of traditional learning and online learning. However, some problems of blended learning have also ...
Perception of MOOC Pedagogical Tools and Learners' Learning Styles in MOOC Blended Teaching: a Case Study
ICEBT '19: Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on E-Education, E-Business and E-TechnologyRapid development has been achieved since the emergence of MOOC in 2008, but there are still many defects in the popularization of MOOC. Developing blended teaching by utilizing is considered to be one of effective means to overcome these shortcomings. ...
Comments