skip to main content
10.1145/2512840.2512860acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmswimConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On-the-fly VoIP call quality evaluation with improved E-model

Published:03 November 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an improvement to an existing VoIP call quality model in the context of mobile networks, that works on-the-fly and deals with uncertainty. Subjective call quality evaluation with real people is expensive and hard to setup. Network engineers would benefit from automated means to approximate these subjective measures, such as the ITU-T E-model, in the development and planning phases. We have improved this call quality model to allow on-the-fly measurement while dealing with uncertainty inherent to the model, included additional corrections, and implemented it as a ns-2 module. Accurate and on-the-fly evaluation also enables further analysis and optimization tasks, such as those performed in previous work. We compare our version against the original definition of the E-model and present further results from our simulations.

References

  1. ITU Recommendation P.800. Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality. Technical report, ITU, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. ITU Recommendation G.108. Application of the E-model: A planning guide. Technical report, ITU, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. ETSI TS 101 329--5. TIPHON Release 3; Technology Compliance Specification; Part 5: Quality of Service (QoS) measurement methodologies. Technical report, ETSI, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. ITU Recommendation P.862. Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ), an objective method for end-to-end speech quality assessment of narrowband telephone networks and speech codecs. Technical report, ITU, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. ITU Recommendation G.107. The E-model: a computational model for use in transmission planning. Technical report, ITU, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. M. Andreozzi, D. Migliorini, G. Stea, and C. Vallati. Ns2Voip, an enhanced module for VoIP simulations. In Proceedings of the 3rd International ICST Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques, SIMUTools '10, 2010 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. L. Carvalho, E. Mota, R. Aguiar, A. Lima, and J. de Souza. An E-model implementation for speech quality evaluation in VoIP systems. In Computers and Communications, 2005. ISCC 2005. Proceedings. 10th IEEE Symposium on, pages 933--938, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. Cicconetti, E. Mingozzi, and G. Stea. An integrated framework for enabling effective data collection and statistical analysis with ns-2. In WNS2 '06: Proceeding from the 2006 workshop on ns-2: the IP network simulator, page 11, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. D. Clark. Modeling the Effects of Burst Packet Loss and Recency on Subjective Voice Quality. In IPtel 2001 Workshop, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Conway. A passive method for monitoring voice-over-IP call quality with ITU-T objective speech quality measurement methods. In Communications, 2002. ICC 2002. IEEE International Conference on, volume 4, pages 2583--2586 vol.4, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. R. Cox and R. Perkins. Results of a Subjective Listening Test for G.711 with Frame Erasure Concealment. Technical report, May 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A. Markopoulou, F. Tobagi, and M. Karam. Assessment of VoIP quality over Internet backbones. In INFOCOM 2002. Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proceedings. IEEE, volume 1, pages 150--159 vol.1, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. P. Merino and A. Salmerón. Combining SPIN with ns-2 for protocol optimization. In 17th International SPIN Workshop on Model Checking of Software, SPIN 2010, volume 6349, pages 40--57. Springer, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. F. J. Rivas, A. Díaz, and P. Merino. Performance Study of Internet Traffic On High Speed Railways. In IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WOWMOM), 2013, June 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. L. Sun and E. Ifeachor. Voice quality prediction models and their application in VoIP networks. Multimedia, IEEE Transactions on, 8(4):809--820, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Takahashi, H. Yoshino, and N. Kitawaki. Perceptual QoS assessment technologies for VoIP. Communications Magazine, IEEE, 42(7):28--34, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On-the-fly VoIP call quality evaluation with improved E-model

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        PM2HW2N '13: Proceedings of the 8th ACM workshop on Performance monitoring and measurement of heterogeneous wireless and wired networks
        November 2013
        226 pages
        ISBN:9781450323710
        DOI:10.1145/2512840

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 November 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        PM2HW2N '13 Paper Acceptance Rate30of115submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate74of226submissions,33%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader