skip to main content
10.1145/2513190.2517828acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
panel

Data warehousing and OLAP over big data: current challenges and future research directions

Published:28 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we highlight open problems and actual research trends in the field of Data Warehousing and OLAP over Big Data, an emerging term in Data Warehousing and OLAP research. We also derive several novel research directions arising in this field, and put emphasis on possible contributions to be achieved by future research efforts.

References

  1. Cuzzocrea, A., Song, I.-Y., and Davis, K. C. Analytics over Large-Scale Multidimensional Data: The Big Data Revolution! Proc. of ACM DOLAP, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Gray, J., Chaudhuri, S., Bosworth, A., Layman, A., Reichart, D., Venkatrao, M., Pellow, F., and Pirahesh, H. Data Cube: A Relational Aggregation Operator Generalizing Group-by, Cross-Tab, and Sub Totals. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 1(1), 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Harinarayan, V., Rajaraman, A., and Ullman, J. D. Implementing Data Cubes Efficiently. Proc. of SIGMOD Conference, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chen, C., Yan, X., Zhu, F., Han, J., and Yu, P. S. Graph OLAP: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for Graph Data Analysis. Knowledge and Information Systems 21(1), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jensen, M. R., Møller, T. H., and Pedersen, T. B. Specifying OLAP Cubes on XML Data. Proc. of SSDBM, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Zhao, P., Li, X., Xin, D., and Han, J. Graph Cube: On Warehousing And OLAP Multidimensional Networks. Proc. of ACM SIGMOD, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Yuan, Y., Lin, X., Liu, Q., Wang, W., Yu, J. X., and Zhang, Q. Efficient Computation of the Skyline Cube. Proc. of VLDB, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dehne, F. K. H. A., Eavis,T., and Rau-Chaplin, A. The cgmCUBE Project: Optimizing Parallel Data Cube Generation for ROLAP. Distributed and Parallel Databases 19(1), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sitaridi, E. A., and Ross, K. A. Ameliorating Memory Contention of OLAP Operators on GPU Processors. Proc. of ACM DaMoN, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Sarawagi, S., Agrawal, R., and Megiddo, N. Discovery-Driven Exploration of OLAP Data Cubes. Proc. of EDBT, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Abouzeid, A., Bajda-Pawlikowski, K., Abadi, D. J., Rasin, A., and Silberschatz, A. HadoopDB: An Architectural Hybrid of MapReduce and DBMS Technologies for Analytical Workloads. PVLDB 2(1), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Agrawal, D., Das, D., and El Abbadi, A. Big Data and Cloud Computing: Current State and Future Opportunities. Proc. of EDBT, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Cuzzocrea, A., and Bertino, E. Privacy Preserving OLAP over Distributed XML Data: A Theoretically-Sound Secure-Multiparty-Computation Approach. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 77(6), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Cattell, R. Scalable SQL and NoSQL Data Stores. SIGMOD Record 39(4), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Cuzzocrea, A., and Saccà, D. Balancing Accuracy and Privacy of OLAP Aggregations on Data Cubes. Proc. of DOLAP, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Bellatreche, L., Cuzzocrea, A., and Benkrid, S. Effectively and Efficiently Designing and Querying Parallel Relational Data Warehouses on Heterogeneous Database Clusters: The F&A Approach. Journal of Database Management 23(4), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Cohen, J., Dolan, B., Dunlap, M., Hellerstein, J. M., and Welton, C. MAD Skills: New Analysis Practices for Big Data. PVLDB 2(2), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Dean, J., and Ghemawat, S. MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters. Communications of the ACM 51(1), 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Khouri, S., Bellatreche, L., and Berkani, N. MODETL: A Complete MODeling and ETL Method for Designing Data Warehouses from Semantic Databases. Proc. of COMAD, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Khouri, S., and Bellatreche, L. DWOBS: Data Warehouse Design from Ontology-Based Sources. Proc. of DASFAA, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Herodotou, H., Lim, H., Luo, G., Borisov, N., Dong, L., Cetin, F. B., and Babu, S. Starfish: A Self-Tuning System for Big Data Analytics. Proc. of CIDIR, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jiang, D., Ooi, B.C., Shi, L., and Wu, S. The Performance of MapReduce: An In-depth Study. PVLDB 3(1), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Thusoo, A. Sarma, J.S., Jain, N., Shao, Z., Chakka, P. Zhang, N., Antony, S., Liu, H., and Murthy, R. Hive - A Petabyte Scale Data Warehouse Using Hadoop. Proc. of ICDE, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Bizer, C., Boncz, P. A., Brodie, M. L., and Erling, O. The Meaningful Use of Big Data: Four Perspectives - Four Challenges. SIGMOD Record 40(4), 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Chen, Y., Alspaugh, S., and Katz, R. H. Interactive Analytical Processing in Big Data Systems: A Cross-Industry Study of MapReduce Workloads. PVLDB 5(12), 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Cuzzocrea, A., Saccà, D., and Serafino, P. Semantics-Aware Advanced OLAP Visualization of Multidimensional Data Cubes. International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining 3(4), 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Cuzzocrea, A., Saccà, D., and Serafino, P. A Hierarchy-Driven Compression Technique for Advanced OLAP Visualization of Multidimensional Data Cubes. Proc. of DaWaK, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Cuzzocrea, A. Retrieving Accurate Estimates to OLAP Queries over Uncertain and Imprecise Multidimensional Data Streams. Proc. of SSDBM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Cuzzocrea, A., and Chakravarthy, S. Event-based Lossy Compression for Effective and Efficient OLAP over Data Streams. Data and Knowledge Engineering 69(7), 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Cuzzocrea, A. Providing Probabilistically-Bounded Approximate Answers to Non-Holistic Aggregate Range Queries in OLAP. Proc. of ACM DOLAP, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Data warehousing and OLAP over big data: current challenges and future research directions

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        DOLAP '13: Proceedings of the sixteenth international workshop on Data warehousing and OLAP
        October 2013
        110 pages
        ISBN:9781450324120
        DOI:10.1145/2513190

        Copyright © 2013 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 October 2013

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • panel

        Acceptance Rates

        DOLAP '13 Paper Acceptance Rate13of26submissions,50%Overall Acceptance Rate29of79submissions,37%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader