skip to main content
10.1145/2513506.2513525acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdppiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Glitch, please: datamoshing as a medium-specific application of digital material

Published:03 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Digital material, the computation and information that makes digital devices function, can be ethereal and difficult to conceptualize in terms of its material properties. In terms of experience design, this can make it difficult to tap into the expressive capabilities of this unique medium. We investigate the properties of computational material by looking at glitches, errors in functioning, through the lens of medium-specificity. As a specific type of glitch art, we look at datamoshing - a technique where the compression of digital video is altered for creative purposes. By examining the ways that the digital material is revealed by datamoshing, we seek insight into the unique expressive capabilities of digital devices.

References

  1. Bardzell, J. (2011) Interaction criticism: an introduction to the practice, Interacting with computers 23(6):604--621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Blanchette, J. F. (2011). A material history of bits. J Am Soc Inform Sci, 62(6): 1042--1057. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brown, W. and Kutty, M. (2012) Datamoshing and the emergence of digital complexity from digital chaos. Convergence 18(2): 165--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Buechley L, Mako Hill B (2010) LilyPad in the wild: how hardware's long tail is supporting new engineering and design communities. In Proc DIS'10, New York, ACM pp 199--207. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Burgess, J. (2007) Vernacular Creativity and New Media. Doctoral Dissertation. Queensland University of Technology, Queensland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll N (1985) Specificity of media in the arts. Journal of Aesthetic Education 19(4): 5--20Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Davis, T. (2011) Precise mishandling of the digital image structure. Design, User Experience, and Usability. Theory, Methods, Tools and Practice Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6769: pp 211--220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Doane M A (2007) The indexical and the concept of medium specificity. Differences 18(1): 397--408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Dourish P, Mazmanian M (2011) Media as material: information representation as material foundations for organizational practice. Third Internation Symposium on Process Organization Studies, Corfu, Greece pp 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Downey, J. O. N. A. S. (2002). Glitch art. Ninethletter. Retrieved May, 28, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fortin, C, DiPaola, S, Hennessy, K, Bizzochi, J. Neustaedtler, C (2013) Medium-specific properties of urban screens: Towards an ontological framework for digital public displays. Proc. C&C'13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Fuchsberger, V., Murer, M., & Tscheligi, M. (2013). Materials, materiality, and media. Proc. CHI'13 pp 2853--2862. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gross S., Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S. (2013) Structures, forms, and stuff: the materiality and medium of interaction. Personal and ubiquitous computing, (DOI) 10.1007/s00779-013-0689-4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gross S., Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S. (2013) Touch style: Creativity in tangible experience design. Proc. C&C'13 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gross, S., Pace, T., Bardzell, J. and Bardzell, S. (2013) Machinima production tools: a vernacular history of a creative medium. Proc. CHI'13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Heylighen, F., & Joslyn, C. (2001). Cybernetics and second order cybernetics.Encyclopedia of physical science & technology, 4, 155--170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hornecker E (2012) Beyond affordances: tangibles' hybrid nature. Proc. TEI'12, pp 175--182. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Huffman, D. A. (1952) A method for the construction of minimum-redundancy codes. Proc. IRE 40: pp. 1098--1101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ishii H, Ullmer B (1997) Tangible bits: towards seamless integration interfaces between people, atoms, and bits. Proc CHI'97, pp 234--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jung, H. and Stolterman, E. (2012) Digital form and materiality: propositions for a new approach to interaction design research. In Proc. NordiCHI'12, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lanier, J. (2010). You are not a gadget. Vintage. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2004). Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. Mit Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Menkman, R. (2011) Glitch studies manifesto. In Lovink, G. and Miles, R. S. (eds.) Video Vortex Reader II: Moving Images Beyond YouTube, Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam, pp. 336--347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller D (2009) Stuff. Polity, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Robles E, Wiberg M (2010) Texturing the "material turn" in interaction design. In Proc TEI'10, New York, ACM pp 137--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Rosner D, Ryokai K (2009) Reflections on craft: probing the creative process of everyday knitters. Proc C&C'09, pp 195--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Schön, D A (1987) Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Schultz-Figueroa, B (2011) Glitch/Glitsh: (More Power) Lucky Break and the position of modern technology. Culture Machine 12: 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Vallgårda A, Redstöm J (2007) Computational composites. In Proc CHI'07, New York, ACM pp 513--522. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Verostko, R, (2012) The Algorists. Online available at http://www.verostko.com/algorist.html Accessed July 23, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    DPPI '13: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces
    September 2013
    263 pages
    ISBN:9781450321921
    DOI:10.1145/2513506

    Copyright © 2013 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 3 September 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    DPPI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate27of53submissions,51%Overall Acceptance Rate27of53submissions,51%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader