skip to main content
10.1145/2513506.2513527acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdppiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Digitally complemented zoomorphism: a theoretical foundation for human-animal interaction design

Published:03 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

From an interspecies perspective, we advocate for a theoretical foundation aimed at facilitating further research towards digitally mediated human-animal interaction. The proposed framework follows an approach we call 'digitally complemented zoomorphism' and recognizes 'play' as a free and voluntary activity that is shared by both animals and humans. As a result, three initial design guidelines will emerge. Our work is pursued in order to provide animals with stimulations which stem from a closer understanding of their perceptions and are not solely designed around human subjectivity.

References

  1. Alfrink, K., Van Peer, I., Lagerweij, H., Driessen, C., and Bracke, M. Playing with Pigs. Retrieved September 2, 2012 from http://www.playingwithpigs.nlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bekoff, M., and Allen, C. 1997. Intentional communication and social play: how and why animals negotiate and agree to play. In Bekoff, M., and Byers, J. A. 1998. Animal Play. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Burghardt, G. M. 2006. The genesis of animal play. Testing the limits. London: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Camstreams for Pets. Retrieved September 10, 2012 from http://www.camstreams.com/petanimalwebcams.aspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. De Mul, J. 2010. Cyberspace Odyssey: Towards a Virtual Ontology and Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. De Mul, J. 2013. Understanding nature. Dilthey, Plessner and biohermeneutics. In: G. D'Anna, H. Johach, and E. S. Nelson (eds.), Dilthey, Anthropologie, und Geschichte. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, Spring 2013. Preprint available at http://www.demul.nl/en/publications/select-publication-catagory/book-chapters/item/1523-understanding-nature-dilthey,-plessner-and-biohermeneuticsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dennett, D. C. Intentional systems. Journal of Philosophy, LXVIII 4 (1971), 87--106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Goodenough, A. E., Smith, A. L., Stubbs, H., Williams, R., and Hart, A. G. Observer variability in measuring animal biometrics and fluctuating asymmetry when using digital analysis of photographs. Ann. Zool. Fennici 49 (2012), 81--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Haraway, D. 2008. When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Huizinga, J. 1955. Homo ludens; a study of the play-element in culture. Boston: Beacon Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. ISeePet. Retrieved September 10, 2012 from http://www.ehomeupgrade.com/2004/04/24/iseepet-webcamfeeder/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, S. P., Cheok, A. D., and James, T. K. S. A. Mobile pet wearable computer and mixed reality system for human-poultry interaction through the internet. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10 (2006), 301--317. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mancini, C. Animal-computer interaction: A manifesto. ACM Interactions 18 (2011), 69--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mancini, C., Van Der Linden, J., Bryan, J., and Stuart, A. Exploring interspecies sensemaking: Dog tracking semiotics and multispecies ethnography. Proceedings ACM Ubicomp (2012), 143--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Newberry, R. C. Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44 (1995), 229--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Norman, D. A., and Drapper, S. W. 1986. User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Noz, F and An, J. Cat cat revolution: An interspecies gaming experience. Proc. Of the 29th International Conference, Human Factors in Computing Systems (2011), 2661--2664. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Paasovaara, S., Paldanius, M., Saarinen, P., Häkkilä, J., and Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. The secret life of my dog -- design and evaluation of paw tracker concept. Proc. Of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (2011), 231--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Paldanius, M., Kärkkäinen, T., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K., Juhlin, O., and Häkkilä, J. Communication technology for human-dog interaction: Exploration of dog owners' experiences and expectations. Proc. Of the 29th International Conference, Human Factors in Computing Systems (2011), 2641--2650. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Plessner, H. 2006 (1928). I gradi dell'organico e l'uomo. Introduzione all'antropologia filosofica. Torino (Italy): Bollati Boringhieri.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Rossing, W., Hogewerf, P. H., Ipema, A. H., Ketelaar-De Lauwere, C. C., and De Koning, C. J. A. M. Robotic milking in dairy farming. NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 45 (1997), 15--31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Schuler, D., and Namioka, A. 1993. (Eds). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Tagg The Pet Tracker. Retrieved September 10, 2012 from http://www.pettracker.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tyler, T., and Rossini, M. 2009. Animal encounters. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Väätäjä, H., Pesonen, E. K. Ethical issues and guidelines when conducting HCI studies with animals. CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2013), 2159--2168. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Weilenmann, A., and Juhlin, O. Understanding people and animals: The use of a positioning system in ordinary human canine interaction. Proc. Of the 29th International Conference, Human Factors in Computing Systems (2011), 2631--2640. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Wingrave, C. A., Rose, J., Langston, T., and LaViola, J. J. Early explorations of CAT: Canine amusement and training. Proc. Of the 28th of the International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2010), 2661--2670. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Digitally complemented zoomorphism: a theoretical foundation for human-animal interaction design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      DPPI '13: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces
      September 2013
      263 pages
      ISBN:9781450321921
      DOI:10.1145/2513506

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 September 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DPPI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate27of53submissions,51%Overall Acceptance Rate27of53submissions,51%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader