skip to main content
10.1145/2514601.2514605acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicailConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Managing legal interpretation in regulatory compliance

Published: 10 June 2013 Publication History

Abstract

Maintaining regulatory compliance is an increasing area of concern for business. Legal Knowledge Management systems that combine repositories of legislation with legal ontologies can support the work of in-house compliance managers. But there are challenges to overcome, of interpreting legal knowledge and mapping that knowledge onto business processes, and developing systems that can adequately handle the complexity with clarity and ease. In this paper we extend the Legal Knowledge Management system Eunomos to deal with alternative interpretations of norms connecting it with Business Process Management systems. Moreover, we propose a workflow involving the different roles in a company, which takes legal interpretation into account in mapping norms and processes, using Eunomos as a support.

References

[1]
Gianmaria Ajani, Guido Boella, Leonardo Lesmo, Marco Martin, Alessandro Mazzei, Daniele P. Radicioni, and Piercarlo Rossi. Multilevel legal ontologies. In Enrico Francesconi, Simonetta Montemagni, Wim Peters, and Daniela Tiscornia, editors, Semantic Processing of Legal Texts, pages 136--154. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010.
[2]
Ahmed Awad, Gero Decker, and Mathias Weske. Efficient compliance checking using bpmn-q and temporal logic. In Marlon Dumas, Manfred Reichert, and Ming-Chien Shan, editors, Business Process Management, volume 5240 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 326--341. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008.
[3]
Imran Sarwar Bajwa, Mark G. Lee, and Behzad Bordbar. SBVR business rules generation from natural language specification. In Artificial Intelligence for Busienss Agility: Papers from the AAAI Spring Symposium Series, pages 541--545, 2011.
[4]
Guido Boella, Llio Humphreys, Marco Martin, Piercarlo Rossi, and Leendert van der Torre. Eunomos, a legal document management system based on legislative xml and ontologies. In Legal Applications of Human Language Technology (AHLTL) at ICAIL'11, 2011.
[5]
Guido Boella, Llio Humphreys, Marco Martin, Piercarlo Rossi, Andrea Violato, and Leendert van der Torre. Eunomos, a legal document and knowledge management system for regulatory compliance. In Information Systems: Crossroads for Organization, Management, Accounting and Engineering (ITAIS11), pages 571--578. Springer, 2012.
[6]
Brigitte Burgemeestre, Joris Hulstijn, and Yao-Hua Tan. Rule-based versus principle-based regulatory compliance. In G. Governatori, editor, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (JURIX 2009), pages 37--46. IOS Press, 2009.
[7]
Brigitte Burgemeestre, Joris Hulstijn, and Yao-Hua Tan. Value-based argumentation for justifying compliance. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 19(2-3):149--186, 2011.
[8]
Luigi Di Caro, K. Selçuk Candan, and Maria Luisa Sapino. Navigating within news collections using tag-flakes. J. Vis. Lang. Comput., 22(2):120--139, 2011.
[9]
COSO. Enterprise risk management - integrated framework. Technical report, Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, 2004.
[10]
Ken Doughty. The three lines of defence related to risk governance. ISACA Journal, 5, 2011.
[11]
Ronald Dworkin. Taking Rights Seriously. Duckworth, London, 1977.
[12]
Marwane El Kharbili, Qin Ma, Pierre Kelsen, and Elke Pulvermueller. Corel: Policy-based and model-driven regulatory compliance management. In Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), 2011 15th IEEE International, pages 247--256. IEEE, 2011.
[13]
Welmoed Fokkema and Joris Hulstijn. Process compliance in public information chains. In Proceedings of The Tenth Conference on Electronic Government (EGOV 2011), 2011.
[14]
Stijn Goedertier, Raf Haesen, and Jan Vanthienen. Rule-based business process modelling and enactment. International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management, 3(3):194--207, 2009.
[15]
Yiwei Gong and Marijn Janssen. From policy implementation to business process management: Principles for creating flexibility and agility. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1):S61S71, 2012.
[16]
Guido Governatori and Shazia Sadiq. The journey to business process compliance, pages 426--445. IGI Global, 2009.
[17]
Jana Koehler. The process-rule continuum: Can BPMN & SBVR cope with the challenge? In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing (CEC'2011). IEEE, 2011.
[18]
Ruopeng Lu, Shazia Sadiq, and Guido Governatori. Measurement of compliance distance in business work practice. Information Systems Management, 25(4):344--355, 2009.
[19]
Michael Power. Organized Uncertainty: Designing a World of Risk Management. Oxford University Press, 2007.
[20]
Henry Prakken and Giovanni Sartor. A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4(3-4):331--368, 1996.
[21]
Piercarlo Rossi and Christian Vogel. Terms and concepts; towards a syllabus for european private law. European Review of Private Law (ERPL), 12(2):293--300, 2004.
[22]
Anne Rozinat and Wil M. P. van der Aalst. Conformance checking of processes based on monitoring real behavior. Inf. Syst., 33(1):64--95, 2008.
[23]
David Schumm, editor. Compliance-driven Models, Languages, and Architectures for Services (COMPAS): Achievements and Lessons Learned. 2011.
[24]
Jeroen van Grondelle, Ronald Heller, Emiel van Haandel, and Tim Verburg. Involving business users in formal modeling using natural language pattern sentences. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Knowledge engineering and management by the masses, EKAW'10, pages 31--43, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. Springer-Verlag.
[25]
Douglas Walton. Argumentation theory: A very short introduction. In Iyad Rahwan and Guillermo Simari, editors, Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pages 1--24. Springer, Berlin, 2009.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)On Developing an Artifact-Based Approach to Regulatory Requirements Engineering2024 IEEE 32nd International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)10.1109/REW61692.2024.00041(262-271)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
  • (2020)Compliance Requirements in Large-Scale Software Development: An Industrial Case StudyProduct-Focused Software Process Improvement10.1007/978-3-030-64148-1_24(385-401)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2020
  • (2019)A practical process mining approach for compliance managementJournal of Financial Regulation and Compliance10.1108/JFRC-12-2018-016327:4(464-478)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
ICAIL '13: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
June 2013
277 pages
ISBN:9781450320801
DOI:10.1145/2514601
  • Conference Chair:
  • Enrico Francesconi,
  • Program Chair:
  • Bart Verheij
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

  • ITTIG-CNR: Istituto di Teoria e Tecniche dell'Informazione Giuridica - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
  • IAAIL: Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 June 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ICAIL '13
Sponsor:
  • ITTIG-CNR
  • IAAIL

Acceptance Rates

ICAIL '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 17 of 53 submissions, 32%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 169 submissions, 41%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)61
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)On Developing an Artifact-Based Approach to Regulatory Requirements Engineering2024 IEEE 32nd International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)10.1109/REW61692.2024.00041(262-271)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2024
  • (2020)Compliance Requirements in Large-Scale Software Development: An Industrial Case StudyProduct-Focused Software Process Improvement10.1007/978-3-030-64148-1_24(385-401)Online publication date: 21-Nov-2020
  • (2019)A practical process mining approach for compliance managementJournal of Financial Regulation and Compliance10.1108/JFRC-12-2018-016327:4(464-478)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2019
  • (2018)Regulatory compliance of business processesAI & Society10.1007/s00146-014-0536-930:3(393-402)Online publication date: 26-Dec-2018
  • (2018)Using Business Process Compliance Approaches for Compliance Management with Regard to Digitization: Evidence from a Systematic Literature ReviewBusiness Process Management10.1007/978-3-319-98648-7_24(409-425)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2018
  • (2018)Compliance Management in Business ProcessesDigital Business10.1007/978-3-319-93940-7_3(53-91)Online publication date: 27-Jul-2018
  • (2017)Compliance patternsProceedings of the 16th edition of the International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law10.1145/3086512.3086526(139-148)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2017
  • (2017)Abductive Reasoning on Compliance MonitoringFoundations of Intelligent Systems10.1007/978-3-319-60438-1_1(3-16)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2017
  • (2016)Towards adaptive complianceProceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems10.1145/2897053.2897070(108-114)Online publication date: 14-May-2016
  • (2016)Argumentation-Based Legal Requirements Engineering: The Role of Legal Interpretation in Requirements Acquisition2016 IEEE 24th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)10.1109/REW.2016.048(249-258)Online publication date: Sep-2016
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media