skip to main content
10.1145/2516540.2516574acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Haptic in-seat feedback for lane departure warning

Published:28 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

A Lane Departure Warning (LDW) system for trucks was developed and evaluated in an iterative design process. As the auditory warning signals used by the majority of LDW systems are disliked by drivers, most effort was put in the design of haptic warning signals. The iterative design process resulted in two different haptic warning signals displayed through vibration motors in the seat: a "blinking" signal for Medium Criticality departures and a continuously vibrating signal for High Criticality departures. In addition, the iterative design process also resulted in small modifications in the auditory warning signals. The effectiveness and user acceptance of the haptic and auditory warning signals were evaluated in an experiment with a driving simulator with 20 participants and in a road test with a truck with 5 participants. It was found that the haptic warning signals were as effective as the auditory warning signals in dealing with lane departures, both in normal driving situations and in a driving + secondary task situation. In addition, the participants clearly preferred the haptic signals over the auditory warning signals.

References

  1. Beruscha, F., Augsburg, K., Manstetten, D. 2011. Haptic warning signals at the steering wheel: A literature survey regarding lane departure warning systems, Haptics-e, the electronic journal of haptic research, Vol 4, No. 5, 28-Mar-2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chang, W., Hwang W., Gu Ji Y., 2011. Haptic Seat Interfaces for Driver Information and Warning Systems, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27:12 (2011), 1119--1132Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Deroo, M., Hoc, J. M., Mars, F. 2013. Effect of strength and direction of haptic cueing on steering control during near lane departure. Transportation Research Part F 16 (2013) 92--103Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Deroo M, Hoc J. M., Mars F. 2012. Influence of risk expectation on haptically cued corrective manoeuvres during near lane departure. Ergonomics. 2012 Apr;55(4):465--75Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ji, Y. G., Lee, K. I., & Hwang, W. 2011. Haptic perceptions in the vehicle seat. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 21 (2011), 305--325 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Morioka, M., & Griffin, M. J. 2008. Absolute thresholds for the perception of fore-and-aft, lateral, and vertical vibration at the hand, the seat, and the foot. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 314, 357--370Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Navarro, J., Mars, F., and Hoc, J. M., 2007. Lateral control assistance for car drivers: a comparison of motor priming and warning systems. Human Factors, 49 (5), 950--960Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Pohl, J. and Ekmark, J., 2012. Development of a Haptic Intervention System for Unintended Lane Departure, SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0282, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Roßmeier M., Grabsch H. P., Rimini-Döring M., 2005. Blind flight: Do auditory lane departure warnings attract attention or actually guide action? Proceedings of ICAD 05-Eleventh Meeting of the International Conference on Auditory Display, Limerick, Ireland, July 6--9, 2005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sayer, T. B., Sayer, J. R., & Devonshire, J. M. H. 2005. Assessment of a driver interface for lateral drift and curve speed warning systems: Mixed results for auditory and haptic warnings. Proceedings of Driving Assessment, 218--224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Stanley, L. M. 2006. Haptic and auditory cues for lane departure warnings. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting vol. 50 no. 22 (October 2006) 2405--2408Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Suzuki, K., Jansson, H. 2003 An analysis of driver's steering behaviour during auditory or haptic warnings for the designing of lane departure warning system, JSAE Review, Volume 24, Issue 1, January 2003, Pages 65--70Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Viskivis, C., Smith, T. L., Pitcher, M. and Smith, R. 2008. Study on Lane Departure Warning and Lane Change Assistance Systems. Transport Research Laboratory: Project Report PPR 374. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/automotive/files/projects/report_ldwlca_en.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Haptic in-seat feedback for lane departure warning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      AutomotiveUI '13: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
      October 2013
      281 pages
      ISBN:9781450324786
      DOI:10.1145/2516540

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 October 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      AutomotiveUI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate41of67submissions,61%Overall Acceptance Rate248of566submissions,44%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader