skip to main content
10.1145/2517978.2517992acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdh-caseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Classical antiquity and semantic content management on linked open data

Published:10 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

This article treats a digital humanities work in Classical Antiquity. The goal is to develop a Web information system for such a domain and, at the same time, to publish data according to Linked Open Data principles.

We have used the Bibliotheca Iuris Antiqui (BIA) system, a vertical framework in the Ancient Roman Law domain.

The BIA system incorporates three archives: Fontes (full-text Roman Law sources), Opera (bibliographic records) and Thesaurus (Ancient Law conceptual vocabulary). Connections within the information contained in the archives are highlighted by semantic links found in Opera records, whose role is to connect other archives as well (Thesaurus and Fontes).

The BIA system, which has been published so far in CD-ROM and in proprietary format only, has been migrated to the online integrated system BIA-Net, representing the data according to the W3C standards. Hopefully, BIA-Net will also be analyzed by broader and multidisciplinary scientific communities.

We intended to preserve the existing front-end and services of the BIA system, making data in XML format according to the DC, TEI and SKOS vocabularies. In particular, this article details the transformation of Thesaurus content and structure in Semantic Web standards using metadata in SKOS/RDF.

Each concept of the reference domain is designed as part of the BIA-Net system and, at the same time, it is a self-descripted stand alone element, with its URI, in order to allow the definition of an Ontology in the Ancient Law domain.

References

  1. Agnoloni, T., Marinai, E., Peruginelli, G., Sagri, M. T. and Tiscornia, D. 2013. Annotation schema for legal doctrine: a case study on DoGI database. JLIS. it. 4, 1, 227--249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Arcaria, F., Sciuto, P. and Zangara, I. 2012. Da BIA e BD-Rom a BIA-Net: l'integrazione in rete degli archivi dei diritti dell'antichità. In Diritto romano e scienze antichistiche nell'era digitale. Giappichelli, 147--168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Badeva-Bright, M. 2009. Re-thinking "Open" in free and open access to law. In Law via the Internet -- Free access, quality of information, Effectiveness of rights. European Press Academic Publishing, 261--270.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Berners-Lee, T. 2009. Linked Data Design Issues. W3C. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ciula, A., Spence, P. and Vieira, J. M. 2008. Expressing complex associations in medieval historical documents: the Henry III Fine Rolls Project. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 23, 3, 311--325.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gangemi, A. 2012. Tecnologie semantiche per le scienze umane: thesauri, ontologie e linked data. In Diritto romano e scienze antichistiche nell'era digitale. Giappichelli, 189--200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Gangemi, A. and Gliozzo, A. M. 2007. Ontologie. In Bianchini F., Gliozzo A. M. and Matteuzzi M. (Eds.), Instrumentum Vocale: intelligenza artificiale e linguaggio. Bologna Bononia University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gangemi, A., Sagri, M. T. and Tiscornia, D. 2003. Metadata for Content Description in Legal Information. In Proceedings of ICAIL2003 Workshop on Legal Ontologies & Web based legal information management. Edimburgh. http://www.lri.jur.uva.nl/~winkels/LegOnt2003/Gangemi.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Giunti, M., Sergioli, G. and Vivanet G. 2013. L'ontologia BIA-Net: una base per la ricerca di informazioni secondo rapporti di rilevanza nella Bibliotheca Iuris Antiqui. Under review. http://www.webalice.it/marcogiunti/download/papers/AIUCD2012paper_giunti_sergioli_vivanet_web.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Jordanous, A., Hedges, M., Lawrence, K. F. and Tupman, C. 2012. Exploring Manuscripts: Sharing Ancient Wisdoms across the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (Craiova, Romania, June 13--15, 2012).WIMS'12. ACM, New York, N Y, Article N. 44. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2254129.2254184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Katz, A. 2009. Science Future and the Law - Intelligent Agents and Internet Commerce in Ancient Rome. Computers and Law, 20, 1, 35--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mazzola, M. A. 1997. Thesaurus iuris antiqui. Uno strumento per la ricerca bibliografica sui diritti dell'Antichità. Informatica e Diritto, 1, 215--230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Miles, A. 2005. Quick Guide to Publishing a Thesaurus on the Semantic Web. W3C Working Draft. http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-swbp-thesaurus-pubguide-20050517.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Palazzolo N. 1995. Un Thesaurus per la ricerca sui diritti dell'antichità. Esperienze e problemi. In Informatica e diritto, 2, 267--278 {= in Palazzolo N., 2008. IVS e TEXNH, Dal diritto romano all'informatica giuridica, II. Giappichelli, 335--346}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Palazzolo, N. and Maggio, L. 2001. Elementi di informatica romanistica. L. E. Torre snc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Peruginelli, G. 2009. Reflecting on cross-language retrieval of legal information as an essential component of open access. In Law via the Internet -- Free access, quality of information, Effectiveness of rights. European Press Academic Publishing, 477--484.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sartor, G. 2009. Legal concepts as inferential nodes and ontological categories. Artificial intelligence and law, 17, 3, 217--251. DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-009-9079-7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Spampinato, D. 2012. La codifica delle fonti giuridiche romane in TEI / XML e dei dati bibliografici in DC / XML e il progetto BIA-Net. In Minima Epigraphica et Papyrologica, Vol. XII-XV, n. 14--17, L'Erma di Bretschneider, 293--326.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Spampinato, D. 2012. L'uso degli standard XML per la gestione in rete dei documenti giuridici romani. In Diritto romano e scienze antichistiche nell'era digitale. Giappichelli, 169--188.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Classical antiquity and semantic content management on linked open data

                  Recommendations

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in
                  • Published in

                    cover image ACM Other conferences
                    DH-CASE '13: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Collaborative Annotations in Shared Environment: metadata, vocabularies and techniques in the Digital Humanities
                    September 2013
                    113 pages
                    ISBN:9781450321990
                    DOI:10.1145/2517978

                    Copyright © 2013 ACM

                    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                    Publisher

                    Association for Computing Machinery

                    New York, NY, United States

                    Publication History

                    • Published: 10 September 2013

                    Permissions

                    Request permissions about this article.

                    Request Permissions

                    Check for updates

                    Qualifiers

                    • research-article

                    Acceptance Rates

                    DH-CASE '13 Paper Acceptance Rate18of30submissions,60%Overall Acceptance Rate18of30submissions,60%
                  • Article Metrics

                    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
                    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

                    Other Metrics

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader