Attention and human errors in multitask performance
Pages 156 - 159
Abstract
This study examines prospective memory errors in programmer multitasking emphasizing how attention affects performance. It demonstrates that strategically, specific instruction has the benefit of reducing the occurrence of habit intrusion error. It emphasized on how attention affects performance among a group of computer science and engineering students (N=60). The study reports a taxonomical analysis of prospective memory errors. An experimental paradigm was developed to perform a taxonomical analysis of prospective memory errors. There was a significant effect of attention on omission error. Analysis of various errors contributing to overall prospective memory performance failure revealed that omission error comprised of 70.49%, target multi-response error comprised of 16.39%, invalid response error comprised of 11.48%, and habit intrusion error (even though intended to be eliminated) comprised of 1.64%.
References
[1]
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. Prospective memory: An Overview and Synthesis of an Emerging Field. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2007.
[2]
Blavier, A., Rouy, E., Nyssen, A.-S., & De Keyser, V. Prospective issues for error detection. Ergonomics 48, 7 (2005), 758--781.
[3]
Dismukes, R. K., Loukopoulos, L. D., & Jobe, K. K. The challenges of managing concurrent and deferred tasks. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, (2001). Retrieved February 25, 2009, from http://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/publications/KD_LL_KJ_ISAP01.pdf
[4]
Reason, J. T. Absent-mindedness and cognitive control. In J. E. Harris & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Everyday Memory: Actions and Absent-mindedness. Academic Press, London, UK, 1984.
[5]
Kahneman, D. Attention and Effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1973.
[6]
Enns, J. T. The Development of Attention: Research and Theory. Elsevier, NY, USA, 1990.
[7]
Graf, P. Prospective memory retrieval revisited. In N. Ohta, C. M. MacLeod & B. Uttl (Eds.), Dynamic Cognitive Processes. Springer, Tokyo, Japan, 2005.
[8]
Smith, R. E., & Bayen, U. J. A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30, 4 (2004), 756--777.
[9]
Smith, R., E. The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29, 3 (2003), 347--361.
[10]
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. Spontaneous retrieval in prospective memory. In J. S. Nairne (Ed.), The Foundations of Remembering: Essays in Honor of Henry L. Roediger, III. Psychology Press, NY, USA, 2007.
[11]
McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology 14, 7 (2000), S127--S144.
[12]
Sanjram, P. K. & Khan, A. Attention, polychronicity, and expertise in prospective memory performance: Programmers' vulnerability to habit intrusion error in multitasking. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69, 6 (2011), 428--439.
[13]
Dismukes, K., & Nowinski, J. Prospective memory, concurrent task management, and pilot error. In D. W. A. Kramer, & A. Kirlik (Ed.), Attention: From Theory to Practice. Oxford University Press, NY, USA, 2007.
[14]
Overschelde, J. P. V., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1996) norms. Journal of Memory and Language 50, 3 (2004), 289--335.
[15]
Dismukes, R. K. Concurrent task management and prospective memory: Pilot error as a model for the vulnerability of experts. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, USA (2006). Retrieved February 24, 2008, from http://human-factors.arc.nasa.gov/flightcognition/Publications/Dismukes_HFES.pdf.
[16]
König, C. J., Bühner, M., & Mürling, G. Working memory, fluid intelligence, and attention are predictors of multitasking performance, but polychronicity and extraversion are not. Human Performance 18, 3 (2005) 243--266.
Index Terms
- Attention and human errors in multitask performance
Recommendations
Revising the Panko-Halverson taxonomy of spreadsheet errors
Error taxonomies are useful because different types of errors have different commission and detection rates and because error mitigation techniques often are only useful for some types of errors. In the early 1990s, Panko and Halverson developed a ...
If erring is human, is system use divine? Omission errors during post-adoptive system use
AbstractOur study contributes to the research on human error during IS use by studying the antecedents of the omission errors that occur during routine instances of computerized work. While attention lapses have been identified as the main ...
Highlights- We examine the antecedents of omission errors in IS use.
- IS use history has a ...
Error Recovery in Multitasking While Driving
CHI '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsHuman-technology interactions involving errors undermine acceptance and performance. The effect of errors and the ability to recover from them represent a particularly important consideration for design in safety-critical multitasking situations. ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
September 2013
420 pages
Copyright © 2013 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 24 September 2013
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
Conference
APCHI '13
Sponsor:
APCHI '13: 11th Asia Pacific Conference on Computer Human Interaction
September 24 - 27, 2013
Bangalore, India
Upcoming Conference
CHI 2025
- Sponsor:
- sigchi
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 262Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)12
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in