skip to main content
10.1145/2531602.2531667acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescscwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The perception of others: inferring reputation from social media in the enterprise

Published: 15 February 2014 Publication History

Abstract

The emergence of social media allows people to interact with others all over the world. During interaction, people leave many traces behind that can reveal things about themselves, or about how they perceive others: having many followers may indicate that one is an influencer; forum answers that gain high ranking, are likely to testify for expertise; people who gain high ranking in eCommerce sites are likely to be trustworthy. In this paper, we examine whether public online traces can be used for inferring the reputation of a person as perceived by others in relation to trustworthiness, influence, expertise, and impact. We describe a study performed on indicators of reputation that employees leave in a rich organizational social media platform. We compare different indicators, and report the results of an extensive user study with over 500 participants who provided their perception of thousands of others through a set of hypothetical scenarios.

References

[1]
Alnemr, R. & Meinel, C. From reputation models and systems to reputation ontologies. Proc. IFIPTM'11, 99--116.
[2]
Bian, J., Liu, Y., Zhou, D., Agichtein, E., & Zha, H. Learning to recognize reliable users and content in social media with coupled mutual reinforcement. Proc. WWW'09, 51--60.
[3]
Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F. & Gummadi, K.P. Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. Proc. ICWSM'10, 10--17
[4]
Chang, E., Hussain, F.K. & Dillon, T.: Reputation ontology for reputation systems. OTM Workshops. LNCS, 4278, 2006, 1724--1733.
[5]
Chen, B.C., Guo J., Tseng, B., & Yang, J. User reputation in a comment rating environment. Proc. KDD'11, 159--167.
[6]
Dencheva, S., Prause, C.R., & Prinz, W. 2011. Dynamic Self-moderation in a Corporate Wiki to Improve Participation and Contribution Quality. Proc. ECSCW'11, 24--28.
[7]
DiMicco, J.M., Millen, D.R., Geyer, W., Dugan, C., Brownholtz, B. & Muller, M. Motivations for social networking at work. Proc. CSCW'08, 711--720
[8]
DuBois, T., Golbeck, J., and Srinivasan, A. Predicting Trust and Distrust in Social Networks. Proc. IEEE 3rd SocialCom'11, 418--424
[9]
Guy, I., Jacovi, M., Shahar, E., Meshulam, N., Soroka, V., Farrel. S. Harvesting with SONAR -- The Value of Aggregating Social Network Information. CHI'08: 1017--1026
[10]
Guy, I., Jacovi, M., Meshulam, N., Ronen, I., Shahr, E. Public vs. private: comparing public social network information with email. CSCW 2008: 393--402
[11]
1Guy, I., Jacovi, M., Perer, A., Ronen, I., Uziel, E. Same places, Same Things, Same People : mining user similarity on social media. CSCW'10: 41--50
[12]
Hennis, T. Monitoring contributions online: a reputation system to model expertise in online communities. Proc. UMAP'11, 422--425
[13]
Hasan, H. & Pfaff, C.C. The Wiki: an environment to revolutionise employees' interaction with corporate knowledge. Proc OZCHI'06, 377--380
[14]
Hong, L., Yang, Z., & Davison, B.D. Incorporating Participant Reputation in Community-Driven Question Answering Systems. Proc. CSE'09, 475--480.
[15]
Jackson, A., Yates, J. & Orlikowski, W. Corporate Blogging: Building community through persistent digital talk. Proc HICSS'07, 80
[16]
Jacovi, M., Guy, I., Ronen, I., Perer, A., Uziel, E., & Maslenko, M. 2011. Digital Traces of Interest: Deriving Interest Relationships from Social Media Interactions. Proc ECSCW'11, 21--40
[17]
Jarvelin, K. & Kakalainen, J. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 20, 4, 2002, 422--446.
[18]
Kardara, M., Papadakis, G., Papaoikonomou, T., Tserpes, K., & Varvarigou, T. Influence Patterns in Topic Communities of Social Media. Proc. WIMS'12.
[19]
Kiefhaber, R., Hammer, S., Savs, B., Schmitt, J., Roth, M., Kluge, F., Andre, E., & Ungerer, T. The Neighbor-Trust Metric to Measure Reputation in Organic Computing Systems. Proc. SASOW'11. 41--46.
[20]
Kollock, P. The production of trust in online markets. Advances in Group Processes, vol. 16, 1999.
[21]
2Kuter, U., & Golbeck, J. SUNNY: a new algorithm for trust inference in social networks using probabilistic confidence models. Proc. AAAI'07, 1377--1382
[22]
2Manning, C., Raghavan, P., & Schtze, H. 2008. Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press.
[23]
Maresch, O.M. Reputationsbasierte Trust Metriken im Kontext des Semantic Web. Master's thesis, Technische Universit at Berlin, 2005.
[24]
Martín-Vicente, M.I., Gil-Solla, A., Ramos-Cabrer, M., Blanco-Fernández, Y. & López-Nores, M. Semantic inference of user's reputation and expertise to improve collaborative recommendations. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 9, 2012, 8248--8258
[25]
Millen, D.R., Feinberg, J. & Kerr, B. Dogear: Social bookmarking in the enterprise. Proc CHI'06, 111--120.
[26]
McDonald, D.W. & Ackerman, M.S., Expertise Recommender: A Flexible Recommendation System and Architecture. Proc. CSCW'00, 231--240.
[27]
McNally, K., O'Mahony, M.P., Smyth, B., Coyle, M., & Briggs, P. Towards a reputation-based model of social web search. Proc. IUI'10. 179--188.
[28]
Nock, S.L. The Costs of Privacy: Surveillance and Reputation in America. Aldine, New York (1993)
[29]
Resnick, P., Kuwabara, K., Zeckhauser, R. & Friedman. E. 2000. Reputation systems. Com. ACM 43, 12, 2000, 45--48.
[30]
Romero, D.M., Galuba, W., Asur, S. & Huberman, B.A.Influence and Passivity in Social Media. Proc. WWW'11.
[31]
3Steinfield, C., DiMicco, J.M., Ellison, N.B. & Lampe, C. Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization. Proc. C&T'09, 245--254
[32]
3Sun, J. & Tang, J. A survey of models and algorithms for social influence analysis. Charu C. Aggarwal, editor, Social Network Data Analytics, chapter 7, 2011, 177--214.
[33]
3Tausczik, Y.R. & Pennebaker, J.W. Predicting the perceived quality of online mathematics contributions from users' reputations. Proc. CHI'11, 1885--1888.
[34]
Weng, J., Lim, E., Jiang, J. & He, Q. 2010. TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. Proc. WSDM'10, 261--270
[35]
Zhang, J., Ackerman, M., & Adamic, L. Expertise networks in online communities: structure and algorithms. Proc. WWW'07.
[36]
Zhu, H., Huberman, B. & Luon, Y. 2012. To switch or not to switch: understanding social influence in online choices. Proc. CHI'12.
[37]
3Ziegler, C.N. & Lausen G. Spreading Activation Models for Trust Propagation. Proc. IEEE International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce, and e-Service, 2004.
[38]
3Authors left out for blind review. Most liked, fewest friends: Patterns of Enterprise Social Media Use. Paper in submission.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)The online language of work-personal conflictScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-023-48193-313:1Online publication date: 29-Nov-2023
  • (2022)How Social Media, FoMO, and Isolation Influence Our Perceptions of Others Who “Break the Rules”Social Media + Society10.1177/205630512211038418:2Online publication date: 14-Jun-2022
  • (2021)A Social Media Study on Demographic Differences in Perceived Job SatisfactionProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34492415:CSCW1(1-29)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. The perception of others: inferring reputation from social media in the enterprise

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CSCW '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing
    February 2014
    1600 pages
    ISBN:9781450325400
    DOI:10.1145/2531602
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 February 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. enterprise
    2. expertise
    3. influence
    4. reputation
    5. social media
    6. trust
    7. workplace

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CSCW'14
    Sponsor:
    CSCW'14: Computer Supported Cooperative Work
    February 15 - 19, 2014
    Maryland, Baltimore, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    CSCW '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 134 of 497 submissions, 27%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

    Upcoming Conference

    CSCW '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)33
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)The online language of work-personal conflictScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-023-48193-313:1Online publication date: 29-Nov-2023
    • (2022)How Social Media, FoMO, and Isolation Influence Our Perceptions of Others Who “Break the Rules”Social Media + Society10.1177/205630512211038418:2Online publication date: 14-Jun-2022
    • (2021)A Social Media Study on Demographic Differences in Perceived Job SatisfactionProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/34492415:CSCW1(1-29)Online publication date: 22-Apr-2021
    • (2021)Reciprocal Recommender Systems: Analysis of state-of-art literature, challenges and opportunities towards social recommendationInformation Fusion10.1016/j.inffus.2020.12.00169(103-127)Online publication date: May-2021
    • (2019)Perceptions of Food Hypersensitivity Expertise on Social Media: Qualitative StudyInteractive Journal of Medical Research10.2196/108128:2(e10812)Online publication date: 28-Jun-2019
    • (2019)LibRAProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/33592393:CSCW(1-30)Online publication date: 7-Nov-2019
    • (2018)Connecting sellers and buyers on the world's largest inventoryProceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3240323.3241733(490-491)Online publication date: 27-Sep-2018
    • (2018)Personal Recommendations for Raising Social Eminence in an EnterpriseProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces10.1145/3172944.3172956(629-639)Online publication date: 5-Mar-2018
    • (2018)People Recommendation on Social MediaSocial Information Access10.1007/978-3-319-90092-6_15(570-623)Online publication date: 3-May-2018
    • (2017)Spread of Employee Engagement in a Large Organizational NetworkProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/31347161:CSCW(1-20)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2017
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media