research-article

Cursing in English on twitter

Authors:

Krishnaprasad Thirunarayan,

Amit P. ShethAuthors Info & Claims

CSCW '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing

Pages 415 - 425

https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531734

Published: 15 February 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Cursing is not uncommon during conversations in the physical world: 0.5% to 0.7% of all the words we speak are curse words, given that 1% of all the words are first-person plural pronouns (e.g., we, us, our). On social media, people can instantly chat with friends without face-to-face interaction, usually in a more public fashion and broadly disseminated through highly connected social network. Will these distinctive features of social media lead to a change in people's cursing behavior? In this paper, we examine the characteristics of cursing activity on a popular social media platform - Twitter, involving the analysis of about 51 million tweets and about 14 million users. In particular, we explore a set of questions that have been recognized as crucial for understanding cursing in offline communications by prior studies, including the ubiquity, utility, and contextual dependencies of cursing.

References

[1]

Almuhimedi, H., Wilson, S., Liu, B., Sadeh, N., and Acquisti, A. Tweets are forever: a large-scale quantitative analysis of deleted tweets. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, ACM (2013), 897--908.

Digital Library

[2]

Bak, J. Y., Kim, S., and Oh, A. Self-disclosure and relationship strength in twitter conversations. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers-Volume 2, Association for Computational Linguistics (2012), 60--64.

Digital Library

[3]

Cameron, P. Frequency and kinds of words in various social settings, or what the hell's going on? The Pacific Sociological Review 12, 2 (1969), 101--104.

[4]

Jay, T. Cursing in America: A Psycholinguistic Study of Dirty Language in the Courts, in the Movies, in the Schoolyards, and on the Streets. John Benjamins Publishing Co, 1992.

[5]

Jay, T. Why we curse: A neuro-psycho-social theory of speech. John Benjamins Publishing, 2000.

[6]

Jay, T. The utility and ubiquity of taboo words. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4, 2 (2009), 153--161.

[7]

Jay, T., et al. Do offensive words harm people? Psych. Pub. Pol. and L. 15 (2009), 81--315.

[8]

Jay, T., and Janschewitz, K. The pragmatics of swearing. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 4, 2 (2008), 267--288.

[9]

Jay, T. B. Sex roles and dirty word usage: a review of the literature and a reply to haas. Psychological Bulletin 88, 3 (1980), 614--621.

[10]

Kamvar, S. D., and Harris, J. We feel fine and searching the emotional web. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, ACM (2011), 117--126.

Digital Library

[11]

McEnery, T. Swearing in English: Bad language, purity and power from 1586 to the present, vol. 1. Psychology Press, 2006.

[12]

Mehl, M. R., Pennebaker, J. W., et al. The sounds of social life: A psychometric analysis of students' daily social environments and natural conversations. Journal of personality and social psychology 84, 4 (2003), 857--870.

[13]

Morris, M. R., Counts, S., Roseway, A., Hoff, A., and Schwarz, J. Tweeting is believing?: understanding microblog credibility perceptions. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM (2012), 441--450.

Digital Library

[14]

Nasution, R. F., and Rosa, R. N. Swearwords found in chat room yahoo messenger (page: 84--93). E-Journal English Language and Literature 1, 1 (2012).

[15]

Pilotti, M., Almand, J., Mahamane, S., and Martinez, M. Taboo words in expressive language: Do sex and primary language matter? American International Journal of Contemporary Research 2, 2 (2012), 17--26.

[16]

Sood, S., Antin, J., and Churchill, E. Profanity use in online communities. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2012), 1481--1490.

Digital Library

[17]

Stephens, R., Atkins, J., and Kingston, A. Swearing as a response to pain. Neuroreport 20, 12 (2009), 1056--1060.

[18]

Subrahmanyam, K., Smahel, D., Greenfield, P., et al. Connecting developmental constructions to the internet: Identity presentation and sexual exploration in online teen chat rooms. Developmental psychology 42, 3 (2006), 395.

[19]

Thelwall, M. Fk yea i swear: Cursing and gender in a corpus of myspace pages. Corpora 3, 1 (2008), 83--107.

[20]

Banbuilder - PHP curse word function and word list for application developers, moderators, etc., March 2013. http://banbuilder.com/.

[21]

BannedWordList.com - a resource for web administrators, March 2013. http://www.bannedwordlist.com/.

[22]

Habitat for Profanity, July 2010. http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/ reports/2010ProfanityStudy/study.pdf.

[23]

List of Bad Words, March 2013. http://www.noswearing.com/dictionary/.

[24]

How American teens navigate the new world of 'digital citizenship', November 2011. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Teens-and-social-media/Summary/Findings.aspx.

[25]

Pew Internet: Social Networking (full detail), Febrary 2013. http://pewinternet.org/Commentary/2012/March/ Pew-Internet-Social-Networking-full-detail. aspx.

[26]

Profanity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, March 2013. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profanity.

[27]

Watch your mouth! Americans see profanity getting worse, poll finds, March 2006. http://www.nbcnews.com/id/12063093/from/RS.4/?GT1=7938#.UaKaG2cSpZo.

[28]

Bad words list, March 2013. http://urbanoalvarez.es/blog/2008/04/04/bad-words-list/.

[29]

Wang, W., Chen, L., Thirunarayan, K., and Sheth, A. P. Harnessing twitter big data for automatic emotion identification. In Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT), 2012 International Conference on and 2012 International Confernece on Social Computing (SocialCom), IEEE (2012), 587--592.

Digital Library

[30]

Xiang, G., Fan, B., Wang, L., Hong, J., and Rose, C. Detecting offensive tweets via topical feature discovery over a large scale twitter corpus. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, ACM (2012), 1980--1984.

Digital Library

[31]

Xu, J.-M., Zhu, X., and Bellmore, A. Fast learning for sentiment analysis on bullying. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Issues of Sentiment Discovery and Opinion Mining, ACM (2012), 10.

Digital Library

Cited By

Worthen MLeverso JHess CHedgpeth G(2025)“Dude, you’re a Bitch!” Gang Members’ Internet Banging Masculinity via Bitch DiscourseDeviant Behavior10.1080/01639625.2025.2464182(1-16)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2025.2464182
Sulpizio SGünther FBadan LBasclain BBrysbaert MChan YCiaccio LDudschig CDuñabeitia JFasoli FFerrand LFilipović Đurđević DGuerra EHollis GJob RJornkokgoud KKahraman HKgolo-Lotshwao NKinoshita SKos JLee LLee NMackenzie IManojlović MManouilidou CMartinic Mdel Carmen Méndez MMišić KChiangmai NNikolaev AOganyan MRusconi PSamo GTse CWestbury CWongupparaj PYap MMarelli M(2024)Taboo language across the globe: A multi-lab studyBehavior Research Methods10.3758/s13428-024-02376-656:4(3794-3813)Online publication date: 9-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02376-6
Felmlee DFrancisco SHardy M(2024)Networks of Negativity: Gaining Attention Through CyberbullyingInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health10.3390/ijerph2112169921:12(1699)Online publication date: 20-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21121699
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Cursing in English on twitter
1. Applied computing
  1. Law, social and behavioral sciences

Recommendations

Measuring influence on Twitter
i-KNOW '11: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies

There are currently over 175 million Twitter accounts worldwide, making Twitter one of the most popular and most observed Social Media platform. But Twitter is not so much a social network where the exchange of personal information is facilitated -- in ...
Celebrity's self-disclosure on Twitter and parasocial relationships

This study investigated how celebrities' self-disclosure on personal social media accounts, particularly Twitter, affects fans' perceptions. An online survey was utilized among a sample of 429 celebrity followers on Twitter. Results demonstrated that ...
In Twitter we trust(ed): How perceptions of Twitter's helpfulness influence news post credibility perceptions and news engagement
Abstract
This study examines the impacts of news veracity, source credibility, collective social endorsement, and perceptions of Twitter's utility on perceived credibility of and engagement with social media news posts. We conducted a 2 (Veracity: real ...
Highlights
- News veracity and source credibility influence assessments of post credibility.
- Social endorsement does not affect post credibility perceptions or behavioral intent.
- Twitter believers more likely perceive posts as credible and ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CSCW '14: Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing

February 2014

1600 pages

ISBN:9781450325400

DOI:10.1145/2531602

General Chairs:
Susan Fussell
Cornell University
,
Wayne Lutters
University of Maryland, Baltimore County
,
Program Chairs:
Meredith Ringel Morris
Microsoft Research
,
Madhu Reddy
Penn State University

Copyright © 2014 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 February 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

CSCW'14

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CSCW'14: Computer Supported Cooperative Work

February 15 - 19, 2014

Maryland, Baltimore, USA

Acceptance Rates

CSCW '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 134 of 497 submissions, 27%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 2,235 of 8,521 submissions, 26%

Upcoming Conference

CSCW '25

Sponsor:
sigchi

Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

October 18 - 22, 2025

Bergen , Norway

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

85
Total Citations
View Citations
1,235
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)102
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21

Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Worthen MLeverso JHess CHedgpeth G(2025)“Dude, you’re a Bitch!” Gang Members’ Internet Banging Masculinity via Bitch DiscourseDeviant Behavior10.1080/01639625.2025.2464182(1-16)Online publication date: 7-Feb-2025
https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2025.2464182
Sulpizio SGünther FBadan LBasclain BBrysbaert MChan YCiaccio LDudschig CDuñabeitia JFasoli FFerrand LFilipović Đurđević DGuerra EHollis GJob RJornkokgoud KKahraman HKgolo-Lotshwao NKinoshita SKos JLee LLee NMackenzie IManojlović MManouilidou CMartinic Mdel Carmen Méndez MMišić KChiangmai NNikolaev AOganyan MRusconi PSamo GTse CWestbury CWongupparaj PYap MMarelli M(2024)Taboo language across the globe: A multi-lab studyBehavior Research Methods10.3758/s13428-024-02376-656:4(3794-3813)Online publication date: 9-May-2024
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02376-6
Felmlee DFrancisco SHardy M(2024)Networks of Negativity: Gaining Attention Through CyberbullyingInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health10.3390/ijerph2112169921:12(1699)Online publication date: 20-Dec-2024
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21121699
Bendík L(2024)Šesť idiolektov, jeden seriál: komparatívna analýza prekladu vulgarizmov v seriáli YellowjacketsNOVÁ FILOLOGICKÁ REVUE10.24040/nfr.2024.16.1.140-16216:1(140-162)Online publication date: 18-Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.24040/nfr.2024.16.1.140-162
Flesch M(2024)‘Fuck’ and emoticonsGender and Language10.1558/genl.2573418:2(125-149)Online publication date: 23-Aug-2024
https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.25734
Lange P(2024)Ranting in emotional public spheres: Publicizing participatory challenges on YouTubeConvergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies10.1177/1354856524124604430:2(904-921)Online publication date: 16-Apr-2024
https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565241246044
Dorn RKezar LMorstatter FLerman K(2024)Harmful Speech Detection by Language Models Exhibits Gender-Queer Dialect BiasProceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization10.1145/3689904.3694704(1-12)Online publication date: 29-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689904.3694704
Taylor JSimpson ETran ABrubaker JFox SZhu H(2024)Cruising Queer HCI on the DL: A Literature Review of LGBTQ+ People in HCIProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642494(1-21)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642494
Sennary HAbozaid GHemeida AMikhaylov A(2024)RETRACTED ARTICLE: Detection of hate: speech tweets based convolutional neural network and machine learning algorithmsScientific Reports10.1038/s41598-024-76632-214:1Online publication date: 21-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76632-2
Stollznow K(2024)NotesBitch10.1017/9781009392358.008(169-188)Online publication date: 13-Jun-2024
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009392358.008
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten