skip to main content
10.1145/2534008.2534012acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescvmpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improved image segmentation using motion

Published:06 November 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Existing video segmentation methods struggle to work accurately on production images. In particular, methods that rely on colour analysis can suffer when object and background colour ranges are similar. We extend one state of the art method by incorporating motion information from video frames. When tested on a variety of production footage, our new method shows significantly improved results.

References

  1. Adobe. Adobe after effects, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Agarwala, M. Dontcheva, M. Agrawala, S. M. Drucker, A. Colburn, B. Curless, D. Salesin, and M. F. Cohen. Interactive digital photomontage. ACM Trans. Graph., 23(3): 294--302, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Agarwala, A. Hertzmann, D. Salesin, and S. M. Seitz. Keyframe-based tracking for rotoscoping and animation. ACM Trans. Graph., 23(3): 584--591, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. Arbelaez, M. Maire, C. C. Fowlkes, and J. Malik. From contours to regions: An empirical evaluation. In 2009 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2009), 20--25 June 2009, Miami, Florida, USA, pages 2294--2301. IEEE, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. X. Bai and G. Sapiro. A geodesic framework for fast interactive image and video segmentation and matting. In IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2007, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, October 14--20, 2007, pages 1--8. IEEE, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. X. Bai, J. Wang, and G. Sapiro. Dynamic color flow: A motion-adaptive color model for object segmentation in video. In K. Daniilidis, P. Maragos, and N. Paragios, editors, Computer Vision - ECCV 2010 - 11th European Conference on Computer Vision, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, September 5--11, 2010, Proceedings, Part V, volume 6315 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 617--630. Springer, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. X. Bai, J. Wang, D. Simons, and G. Sapiro. Video snapcut: robust video object cutout using localized classifiers. ACM Trans. Graph., 28(3), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Y. Boykov and M.-P. Jolly. Interactive graph cuts for optimal boundary and region segmentation of objects in n-d images. In ICCV, pages 105--112, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. I. Budvytis, V. Badrinarayanan, and R. Cipolla. Mot-mixture of trees probabilistic graphical model for video segmentation. In BMVC, pages 1--11, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. D. Corrigan, S. Robinson, and A. Kokaram. Video Matting Using Motion Extended GrabCut. In IET European Conference on Visual Media Production (CVMP), London, UK, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Criminisi, T. Sharp, and A. Blake. Geos: Geodesic image segmentation. In D. A. Forsyth, P. H. S. Torr, and A. Zisserman, editors, Computer Vision - ECCV 2008, 10th European Conference on Computer Vision, Marseille, France, October 12--18, 2008, Proceedings, Part I, volume 5302 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 99--112. Springer, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Criminisi, T. Sharp, C. Rother, and P. Pérez. Geodesic image and video editing. ACM Trans. Graph., 29(5): 134, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Gleicher. Image snapping. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 95, Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, pages 183--190, aug 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. Kohli and P. H. S. Torr. Dynamic graph cuts for efficient inference in markov random fields. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 29(12): 2079--2088, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Kokaram, B. Collis, and S. Robinson. Automated rig removal with bayesian motion interpolation. Proceedings of the IEE Journal on Vision, Image and Signal Processing, 152: 407--414, Aug 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. A. Kokaram, B. Collis, and S. Robinson. Practical motion based video matting. In proceedings of the IEE European Conference on Visual Media Production (CVMP'05), pages 130--136, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. A. Levin, D. Lischinski, and Y. Weiss. A closed form solution to natural image matting. In 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2006), 17--22 June 2006, New York, NY, USA, pages 61--68. IEEE Computer Society, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. H. Li and C. Shen. Interactive color image segmentation with linear programming. Mach. Vis. Appl., 21(4): 403--412, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Y. Li, J. Sun, C.-K. Tang, and H.-Y. Shum. Lazy snapping. ACM Trans. Graph., 23(3): 303--308, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. E. N. Mortensen and W. A. Barrett. Intelligent scissors for image composition. In SIGGRAPH, pages 191--198, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Paris and F. Durand. A topological approach to hierarchical segmentation using mean shift. In 2007 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2007), 18--23 June 2007, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. IEEE Computer Society, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. B. L. Price, B. S. Morse, and S. Cohen. Livecut: Learning-based interactive video segmentation by evaluation of multiple propagated cues. In IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2009, Kyoto, Japan, September 27--October 4, 2009, pages 779--786. IEEE, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. C. Rother, V. Kolmogorov, and A. Blake. Grabcut: interactive foreground extraction using iterated graph cuts. ACM Trans. Graph., 23(3): 309--314, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. The Foundry. Furnacecore for nuke | vectorgenerator, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. The Foundry. Nuke and nukex | advancing the art of digital compositing, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. P. J. Toivanen. New geodosic distance transforms for grayscale images. Pattern Recognition Letters, 17(5): 437--450, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. J. Wang, P. Bhat, A. Colburn, M. Agrawala, and M. F. Cohen. Interactive video cutout. ACM Trans. Graph., 24(3): 585--594, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Improved image segmentation using motion

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                CVMP '13: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Visual Media Production
                November 2013
                166 pages
                ISBN:9781450325899
                DOI:10.1145/2534008

                Copyright © 2013 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 6 November 2013

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                CVMP '13 Paper Acceptance Rate18of28submissions,64%Overall Acceptance Rate40of67submissions,60%
              • Article Metrics

                • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
                • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

                Other Metrics

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader