skip to main content
10.1145/2535372.2535391acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesconextConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Capturing mobile experience in the wild: a tale of two apps

Published:09 December 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a long term and large scale study of the experience of mobile users through two popular but contrasting applications in the wild. To conduct this study, we implemented a measurement framework and library, called Insight, which has been deployed on these two applications that are available through Apple's App Store and Google's Android Market. One of them, Parallel Kingdom (PK), is a popular massively multiplayer online role-playing game (MMORPG) which has over a million unique users distributed more than 120 countries. The other application, StudyBlue (SB), is an educational application with over 160,000 unique users. Our study spans most of the life of the PK game (more than 3 years) while our deployment with SB has been running for over a year now. We use Insight to collect diverse information about network behavior, application usage and footprints, platform statistics, user actions, and various factors affecting application revenues.

References

  1. Amazon ec2 pricing. http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Appbrain. http://www.appbrain.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Appclix. http://www.mobilytics.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Flurry. http://www.flurry.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kissmetrics. http://www.kissmetrics.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Localytics. http://www.localytics.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Network Test. http://networktest.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Studyblue. http://www.studyblue.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Agarwal, R. Mahajan, A. Zheng, and V. Bahl. Diagnosing mobile applications in the wild. In Hotnets'10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Böhmer, B. Hecht, J. Schöning, A. Krüger, and G. Bauer. Falling asleep with Angry Birds, Facebook and Kindle: a large scale study on mobile application usage. MobileHCI '11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. C. Chambers, W. chang Feng, S. Sahu, D. Saha, and D. Brandt. Characterizing online games. IEEE TON'10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Engadget. Netflix reveals android app tests that keep it running on 'around 1000' devices daily. http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/15/netflix-android-app-testing-process/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. H. Falaki, R. Mahajan, S. Kandula, D. Lymberopoulos, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. Diversity in smartphone usage. In MobiSys '10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. P. FAQ. Cellular data primer. http://www.pocketpcfaq.com/faqs/cellularprimer.htm/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. Huang et. al. Anatomizing Application Performance Differences on Smartphones. In MobiSys, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. L. Leiva, M. Böhmer, S. Gehring, and A. Krüger. Back to the app: the costs of mobile application interruptions. MobileHCI '12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Manweiler, S. Agarwal, M. Zhang, R. Roy Choudhury, and P. Bahl. Switchboard: a matchmaking system for multiplayer mobile games. MobiSys '11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. N. Balasubramanian et al. Energy Consumption in Mobile Phones: A Measurement Study and Implications for Network Applications. In IMC '09. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. Patro, S. Rayanchu, M. Griepentrog, Y. Ma, and S. Banerjee. The anatomy of a large mobile massively multiplayer online game. MobileGames '12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. PerBlue. Parallel kingdom. http://www.parallelkingdom.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. A. Rahmati, C. Tossell, C. Shepard, P. Kortum, and L. Zhong. Exploring iPhone usage: the influence of socioeconomic differences on smartphone adoption, usage and usability. MobileHCI '12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. L. Ravindranath, J. Padhye, S. Agarwal, R. Mahajan, I. Obermiller, and S. Shayandeh. AppInsight: mobile app performance monitoring in the wild. OSDI'12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. C. Shin, J.-H. Hong, and A. K. Dey. Understanding and prediction of mobile application usage for smart phones. UbiComp '12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. J. Sommers and P. Barford. Comparing metro-area cellular and wifi performance: extended abstract. SIGMETRICS '12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. T. K. Wee and R. K. Balan. Adaptive display power management for oled displays. MobileGames '12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Q. Xu, J. Erman, A. Gerber, Z. Mao, J. Pang, and S. Venkataraman. Identifying diverse usage behaviors of smartphone apps. IMC '11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Z. Zhuang, K.-H. Kim, and J. P. Singh. Improving energy efficiency of location sensing on smartphones. MobiSys '10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Capturing mobile experience in the wild: a tale of two apps

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CoNEXT '13: Proceedings of the ninth ACM conference on Emerging networking experiments and technologies
            December 2013
            454 pages
            ISBN:9781450321013
            DOI:10.1145/2535372

            Copyright © 2013 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 9 December 2013

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            CoNEXT '13 Paper Acceptance Rate44of226submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate198of789submissions,25%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader