Cited By
View all- He NYao SYoshie O(2014)Emotional speech classification in consensus building2014 10th International Conference on Communications (COMM)10.1109/ICComm.2014.6866670(1-4)Online publication date: May-2014
Conversation Analysis Based on Interpersonal Relationship in Consensus Building
Authors: 
Ning He, Osamu YoshieAuthors Info & Claims
Ning He, Osamu YoshieAuthors Info & ClaimsPages 26 - 33
Abstract
Building consensus is a process in which participants start with various opinions and reach an agreement as far as possible. During a discussion, participants exhibit different stances such as agree or disagree at other's utterances. In this paper, a stance analysis of participants by combining BBS tree structure and participant relation graph is proposed. The stance change is measured by an approach of information theory. Finally, simulations are provided to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed method.
References
[1]
Lyness A L, Raimond J A. 1992. Electronic communication to promote consensus-building skills: an innovative teaching strategy. The Journal of nursing education, 31(7): 331.
[2]
Cline R J W. 1990. Detecting groupthink: Methods for observing the illusion of unanimity. Communication Quarterly, 1990, 38(2): 112--126.
[3]
Cabrerizo F J, Pérez I J, Herrera-Viedma E. 2010. Managing the consensus in group decision making in an unbalanced fuzzy linguistic context with incomplete information. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2010, 23(2): 169--181.
[4]
McGann, Anthony J. 2006. The Logic of Democracy: Reconciling, Equality, Deliberation, and Minority Protection, University of Michigan Press.
[5]
Olfati-Saber R, Murray R M. 2004. Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions, 2004, 49(9): 1520--1533.
[6]
Chen L, Frolik J. 2011. Self-aware distributed consensus building for sensor networks. ISRN Communications and Networking, 2011: 34.
[7]
Chen L, Frolik J. 2012. Active consensus over sensor networks via selective communication. Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), 2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on. IEEE,: 389--397.
[8]
He N, Oda Y, Otani C, et al. 2012. Consensus building analysis using entropy in BBS tree. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services. ACM, 2012: 315--318.
[9]
Murakami A, Raymond R. 2010. Support or oppose?: classifying positions in online debates from reply activities and opinion expressions. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2010: 869--875.
[10]
Shigemasu K and Ueno M. 1993A new item response model with parameters reflecting state of knowledge. Behaviormetrika, 1993: 20(2): pp.161--169.
[11]
Galley M, McKeown K, Hirschberg J, et al. 2004. Identifying agreement and disagreement in conversational speech: Use of bayesian networks to model pragmatic dependencies. Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2004: 669.
Index Terms
- Conversation Analysis Based on Interpersonal Relationship in Consensus Building
Recommendations
A two-step approach to building bilateral consensus between agents based on relationship learning theory
Researchers are increasingly focusing on the agent based approach to transaction support in ubiquitous commerce. These agents work autonomously to maximize utility on the user's behalf. In the case of a cooperative game, rather than a win-lose zero-sum ...
A Study on Consensus Building Mechanism Based on Kansei ~Consideration of Experimental Tasks that Cause Conflicts~
Human-Computer Interaction. Theoretical Approaches and Design MethodsAbstractWe are engaged in a variety of consensus-building activities in our daily lives. In order to build consensus, it is necessary to reach a single conclusion unanimously. Therefore, if there are conflicting opinions, they need to be resolved. To deal ...
A New Approach to Better Consensus Building and Agreement Implementation for Trustworthy AI Systems
Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2021 WorkshopsAbstractWe propose a system that focuses on consensus building and agreement implementation as the basis for establishing AI trustworthiness. Our approach is new, and we have called it consensus building with an assurance case: it is based on applying ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
December 2013
753 pages
ISBN:9781450321136
DOI:10.1145/2539150
- Conference Chairs:
- Edger Weippl,
- Maria Indrawan-Santiago,
- Matthias Steinbauer,
- Gabriele Kotsis,
- Ismail Khalil
Copyright © 2013 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
In-Cooperation
- @WAS: International Organization of Information Integration and Web-based Applications and Services
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 02 December 2013
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Conference
IIWAS '13
IIWAS '13: The 15th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services
December 2 - 4, 2013
Vienna, Austria
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- View Citations1Total Citations
- 121Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)8
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
Cited By
View all- He NYao SYoshie O(2014)Emotional speech classification in consensus building2014 10th International Conference on Communications (COMM)10.1109/ICComm.2014.6866670(1-4)Online publication date: May-2014
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in