skip to main content
10.1145/2540930.2540950acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing interactive technology for skateboarding

Published:16 February 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Interactive technology is increasingly used to support physical activities. However, there is limited knowledge about how interactive technology should be designed to support trick-focused experiences such as skateboarding. We developed Copy Paste Skate, a novel multimodal feedback system, and studied its use by 21 avid skateboarders to explore the design of interactive technology for skateboarding. Based on observations and interviews we articulate two key design dimensions that highlight how designing for skateboarding means supporting execution quality of tricks as well as supporting the trick originality. We also present 4 design strategies to help designers support both dimensions in one integrated design. Our work extends designers' knowledge about how to design interactive technology for skateboarding, ultimately extending our understanding of how interactive technology can support people being physically active.

References

  1. Anlauff, A., Weitnauer, E., Lehnhardt, A., Schirmer, S., Zehe, S., and Tonekaboni, K. A method for outdoor skateboarding video games. ACE'10, (2010), 40--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bimber, O. and Raskar, R. Spatial Augmented Reality: Merging Real and Virtual Worlds. A K Peters, Ltd., Wellesly, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Borden, I. Skateboarding, Space and the City: Architecture and the Body. Berg, New York, USA, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Broker, J. P., and Crawley, J. D. Advanced Sport Technologies: Enhancing Olympic Performance. 19 ISBS, (2001), 323--327.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Buttkicker. thebuttkicker.com/lfe-kit.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Eness. The Making of a Light Session. vimeo.com/18525296.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Fan, C., Forlizzi, J., and Dey, A. K. A Spark Of Activity: Exploring Informative Art As Visualization For Physical Activity. UbiComp'12, (2012), 2--5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Langlotz, T., Zingerle, M., Grasset, R., and Kaufmann, H. AR Record & Replay: Situated Compositing of Video Content in Mobile Augmented Reality. OZCHI'12, (2012), 318--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Marc, B., Kilian, F., and Tr, G. SwimMaster: A Wearable Assistant for Swimmer. UbiComp'09, (2009), 215--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Michalko, M. Thinkertoys: A Handbook of Creative-Thinking Techniques. Ten Speed Press, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Németh, J. Conflict, Exclusion, Relocation: Skateboarding and Public Space. Journal of Urban Design 3, 11 (2006), 311--327.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Nike. Nike+. nikeplus.nike.com/plus/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Nolan, N. The ins and outs of skateboarding and transgression in public space in Newcastle, Australia. Australian Geographer 34, 3 (2003), 311--327.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Otoplasma. Skate Sonic. otoplasma.com/skatesonic.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Pijnappel, S. and Mueller, F. 4 Design Themes for Skateboarding. CHI'13, ACM Press (2013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Reynell, E. and Thinyane, H. Hardware and software for skateboard trick visualisation on a mobile phone. SAICSIT'12, (2012), 253--261. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rigby, S. and Ryan, R. Glued to Games: How Video Games Draw Us in and Hold Us Spellbound. Praeger Publishers, Westport, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Seifert, T. and Hedderson, C. Intrinsic Motivation and Flow in Skateboarding: An Ethnographic Study. Journal of Happiness Studies 11, 3 (2009), 277--292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sheridan, J. G., Bayliss, A., Bryan-kinns, N., and Mary, Q. iPoi: acceleration as a medium for digital live art. UbiComp '06, (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Skataviz. design-io.com/projects/Skataviz/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Stienstra, J., Overbeeke, K., and Wensveen, S. Embodying Complexity Through Movement Sonification: Case Study on Empowering the Speed-skater. CHI'11, ACM Press (2011), 39--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Tholander, J. and Johansson, C. Design qualities for Whole Body Interaction -- Learning from Golf, Skateboarding and BodyBugging. NordiCHI 2010, ACM Press (2010), 493--502. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Wikipedia. Tony Hawk's Pro Skater. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Hawk's_Pro_Skater.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Designing interactive technology for skateboarding

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      TEI '14: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction
      February 2014
      401 pages
      ISBN:9781450326353
      DOI:10.1145/2540930

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 February 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      TEI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate46of172submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader