skip to main content
10.1145/2540930.2540962acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tangible and body-related interaction techniques for a singing voice synthesis installation

Published:16 February 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an interactive media installation that aims at providing users with the experience to sing like an opera singer from the 19th century. We designed a set of tangible and body-related interaction and feedback techniques and developed a singing voice synthesizer system that is controlled by the user's mouth shapes and gestures. This musical interface allows users to perform an aria without real singing. We adapted techniques from 3D body tracking, face recognition, singing voice synthesis, 3D rendering and tangible interaction to integrate them into an interactive musical interface.

References

  1. D. Butler, S. Izadi, O. Hilliges, D. Molyneaux, S. Hodges, and D. Kim. Shake'n'sense: Reducing interference for overlapping structured light depth cameras. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '12, pages 1933--1936, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. Cano, A. Loscos, J. Bonada, M. D. Boer, and X. Serra. Voice morphing system for impersonating in karaoke applications. In In Proceedings of the ICMC, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Cheng and P. Huang. Real-time mouth tracking and 3d reconstruction. In Image and Signal Processing (CISP), 2010 3rd International Congress on, volume 4, pages 1524--1528, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. N. D'Alessandro, C. d'Alessandro, S. L. Beux, and B. Doval. Real-time calm synthesizer: New approaches in hands-controlled voice synthesis. In NIME, pages 266--271. IRCAM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. G. C. de Silva, T. Smyth, and M. J. Lyons. A novel face-tracking mouth controller and its application to interacting with bioacoustic models. In Y. Nagashima and M. J. Lyons, editors, NIME, pages 169--172. Shizuoka University of Art and Culture, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. G. Fant. Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. Mouton De Gruyter, 1960.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Feitsch, M. Strobel, and C. Geiger. Caruso - singen wie ein tenor. In Mensch & Computer Workshopband, pages 531--534, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. Feitsch, M. Strobel, and C. Geiger. Singing like a tenor without a real voice. In Advances in Computer Entertainment, pages 258--269. Springer, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Geiger, H. Reckter, D. Paschke, F. Schulz, and C. Poepel. Towards Participatory Design and Evaluation of Theremin-based Musical Interfaces. In Proc. of the Int. Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, pages 303--306, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Goto, T. Nakano, S. Kajita, Y. Matsusaka, S. Nakaoka, and K. Yokoi. Voca-listener and voca-watcher: Imitating a human singer by using signal processing. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2012 IEEE International Conference on, pages 5393--5396, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. R. Linggard. Electronic Synthesis of Speech. Cambridge University Press, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. J. Lyons, M. Haehnel, and N. Tetsutani. Designing, playing, and performing with a vision-based mouth interface. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, NIME '03, pages 116--121, Singapore, Singapore, 2003. National University of Singapore. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. G. Odowichuk, S. Trail, P. Driessen, W. Nie, and W. Page. Sensor fusion: Towards a fully expressive 3d music control interface. In Communications, Computers and Signal Processing (PacRim), 2011 IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on, pages 836--841, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. G. E. Peterson and H. L. Barney. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24(2):175--184, 1952.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. X. Rodet. Synthesis and processing of the singing voice. In In Proc. 1st IEEE Benelux Workshop on Model based Processing and Coding of Audio (MPCA-2002, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. T. Yonezawa, N. Suzuki, K. Mase, and K. Kogure. Handysinger: Expressive singing voice morphing using personified hand-puppet interface. In Proc. of the Int. Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, NIME '05, pages 121--126, Singapore, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Tangible and body-related interaction techniques for a singing voice synthesis installation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      TEI '14: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction
      February 2014
      401 pages
      ISBN:9781450326353
      DOI:10.1145/2540930

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 February 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      TEI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate46of172submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader