skip to main content
10.1145/2541831.2541878acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Who's there?: experience-driven design of urban interaction using a tangible user interface

Published:02 December 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

During recent years public displays relying on new types of display technologies have made their way to the city scene. In this paper, we present a concept that combines tangible interfaces with such ubiquitous urban interaction. We set out to create a tangible connection between different cities and employed an experience-driven design process towards our concept called 'Who's There?'. We evaluated the concept by using a cardboard prototype with a group of fifteen users in a busy market square, where it generated considerable engagement and discussion with members of the public.

References

  1. Kostakos, V. and Ojala, T. 2013. Public Displays Invade Urban Spaces. Pervasive Computing, 12, 1, 8--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ojala, T., Kostakos, V., Kukka, H., Heikkinen, T., Linden, T., Jurmu, M., Hosio, S., Kruger, F., and Zanni, D. 2012. Multipurpose Interactive Public Displays in the Wild: Three Years Later. Computer, 45, 5, 42--49. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ullmer, B. and Ishii, H. 1997. The metaDESK: Models and Prototypes for Tangible User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. UIST '97. ACM, New York, NY, 223--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Terrenghi, L., Kranz, M., Holleis, P., and Schmidt. A. 2006. A Cube to Learn: A Tangible User Interface for the Design of a Learning Appliance. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 10, 2--3 (Jan. 2006), 153--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Burleson, M. and Selker, T. 2003. Canopy Climb: A Rope Interface. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Sketches & Applications. SIGGRAPH '03. ACM, New York, NY, 1--1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Lucero, A. and Arrasvuori, J. 2010. PLEX Cards: A Source of Inspiration When Designing for Playfulness. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Fun and Games. Fun and Games '10. ACM, New York, NY, 28--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Raijmakers, B., Gaver, W. W., and Bishay, J. 2006. Design Documentaries: Inspiring Design Research through Documentary Film. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. DIS'06. ACM, New York, NY, 229--238. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. 1989. Institutional Ecology, Translations and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907--39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 3, 387--420.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Who's there?: experience-driven design of urban interaction using a tangible user interface

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MUM '13: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
      December 2013
      333 pages
      ISBN:9781450326483
      DOI:10.1145/2541831

      Copyright © 2013 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 2 December 2013

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      MUM '13 Paper Acceptance Rate36of107submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate190of465submissions,41%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader