skip to main content
10.1145/2542242.2542252acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschinzConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing a NUI Workstation for Courier Dispatcher Command and Control Task Management

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 November 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Natural User Interface technology greatly changes the way we interact with computer systems, but does it perform as well as their traditional counterparts under pressure? By comparing a selection of user interface devices that provide a range of natural interaction systems, we explore how well the interface devices will perform in a command and control environment such as for a courier dispatcher. A Fitts' pointing experiment was used to make the comparisons and we found that a Multi-touch system performed the best in pointing and selection tasks, followed by mouse, Track-pad and lastly the Leap Motion hand tracking and gesture controller. It was noted that in order for any of the devices to operate at their optimum, then the graphical user interface and the hardware interface needs to be tightly bound together in order to optimize user task performance.

References

  1. What is user-centered design? URL:http://www.upassoc.org/usability_resources/about_usability/what_is_ucd.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Task-centered user interface design. URL:http://hcibib.org/tcuid/chap-1.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. V.D. Hopkin. Situational awareness in air traffic control. In Situational awareness in complex systems: Proceedings of a CAHFA conference, pages 171--178. DTIC Document, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ann Blandford and B.L. William Wong. Situation awareness in emergency medical dispatch. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(4):421 452, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Caroline E Zsambok and Gary Ed Klein. Naturalistic decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. B.L.W. Wong and AE Blandford. Analysing ambulance dispatcher decision making: Trialing emergent themes analysis. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. P.W. County and V. Prince William. Improving structural fire dispatching and communications. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Anton Koros, Pamela S Rocco, Gulshan Panjwani, Victor Ingurgio, and Jean-Francois D'Arcy. Complexity in air traffic control towers: A field study. Part 1. complexity factors. Technical report, DTIC Document, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mica R Endsley and Mark W Smolensky. Situation awareness in air traffic control: The picture. Human factors in air traffic control, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Christopher D Wickens. The future of air traffic control: Human operators and automation. National Academies Press, 1998.64Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. BL Wong. The integrated decision model in emergency dispatch management and its implications for design. Australian journal of information systems, 2(7):95--107, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. D. Furniss and A. Blandford. Understanding emergency medical dispatch in terms of distributed cognition: a case study. Ergonomics, 49(12-13):1174--1203, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jon Crowcroft. The privacy and safety impact of technology choices for command, communications and control of the public highway. SIGCOMM Comput. Commun.Rev., 36(1):53--58, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Blackbay Enterprises. Mobile data delivers benefit to workers and customers alike. URL "http://www.blackbay.com/knowledge-centre/whitepapers".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. A. Garca-Ortiz, S. M. Amin, and J. R. Wootton. Intelligent transportation systems enabling technologies. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 22(47):11--81, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ingmar Rauschert, Pyush Agrawal, Rajeev Sharma, Sven Fuhrmann, Isaac Brewer, and Alan MacEachren. Designing a human-centered, multimodal gis interface to support emergency management, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Stannus, D. Rolf, A. Lucieer, and W. Chinthammit. Gestural navigation in google earth. In Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, pages 269--272. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Andreas Dunser D Mark Billinghurst, and Gabriela Mancero. Evaluating visual search performance with a multi layer display, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jared Hayes, Antoni Moore, and B. L. William Wong. Information layering to de-clutter displays for emergency ambulance dispatch, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. H. Benko and S. Feiner. Multi-monitor mouse. In CHI'05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 1208--1211. ACM, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Norman Villaroman, Dale Rowe, and Bret Swan. Teaching natural user interaction using openni and the microsoft kinect sensor. In Proceedings of the 2011 conference on Information technology education, SIGITE '11, pages 227--232, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kenton OHara, Richard Harper, Helena Mentis, Abigail Sellen, and Alex Tay-lor. On the naturalness of touchless: putting the interaction back into nui. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (ToCHI), Special issue on embodied interaction. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Sebastian Boring, Marko Jurmu, and Andreas Butz. Scroll, tilt or move it: using mobile phones to continuously control pointers on large public displays. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7, OZCHI '09, pages 161--168, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. T. Leyvand, C. Meekhof, Yi-Chen Wei, Jian Sun, and Baining Guo. Kinect identity: Technology and experience. Computer, 44(4):94--96, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. C. Gutwin A. Cockburn, D. Ahlstrom. Understanding performance in touch selections: Tap. drag and radial pointing drag with finger, stylus and mouse. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70:15, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Improving usability with fitts law. URL http://sixrevisions.com/usabilityaccessibility/improving-usability-with-fitts-law/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Paul M Fitts. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. 1954.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Paul M Fitts. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(3):262--269, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Designing a NUI Workstation for Courier Dispatcher Command and Control Task Management

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CHINZ '13: Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM SIGCHI_NZ conference on Computer-Human Interaction
        March 2015
        85 pages
        ISBN:9781450326407
        DOI:10.1145/2542242

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 15 November 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate8of23submissions,35%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader