skip to main content
10.1145/2542284.2542299acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagessiggraph-asiaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Polka dot: the garden of water spirits

Published:19 November 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Physical and tangible representations of information have provided users with direct control of digital information. Representing information in both tangible and intangible forms enables users to control the underlying digital representation more intuitively using their hands [Ishii, et al. 2008]. Though these tangibles accept user's input [Piper, et al. 2002], they cannot provide bi-directional physical interactions since their physical properties are not controlled by the computers. Therefore, it is difficult to represent dynamic changes of such physical properties as motion, size, and color.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Ishii, H. Tangible Bits: beyond pixels, In Proc. of TEI 2008, xv-xxv. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Piper, B., Ratti, C., and Ishii, H. Illuminating clay: a 3-D tangible interface for landscape analysis, In Proc. of SIGGRAPH 2002, 355--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Underkoffler, J., Ishii, H. Urp: a luminous tangibles for urban planning and design, In Proc. of CHI 1999, 386--393. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Kobayashi, K., Hirano, M., Narita, A., and Ishii, H. A tangible interface for IP network simulation, In Proc. of CHI 2003, 800--801. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Patten, J., Ishii, H., Hines, J., and Pangaro, G. Sensetable: a wireless object tracking platform for tangible user interfaces. In Proc. of CHI 2001, 253--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Weiss, M., Schwarz, F., Jakubowski, S., Borchers, J. Madgets: actuating widgets on interactive tabletops, In Proc. of UIST 2010, 293--302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Patten, J., Ishii, H. Mechanical constraints as computational constraints in tabletop interfaces. In Proc. of CHI 2007, 809--818. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Iwata, H., Yano, H., Nakaizumi, F., and Kawamura, R. Project FEELEX: adding haptic surface to graphics. In Proc. of SIGGRAPH 2001, 469--476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Leithinger, D., Ishii, H. Relief: a scalable actuated shape display, In Proc. of TEI 2010, 221--222. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Leithinger, D., Lakatos, D., DeVincenzi, A., Blackshaw, M., and Ishii, H. Direct and gestural interaction with relief: a 2.5D shape display, In Proc. of UIST 2011, 541--548. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Wakita, A., Nakano, A., and Kobayashi, N. Programmable Blobs: a rheologic interface for organic shape design. In Proc. of TEI 2011, 273--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SA '13: SIGGRAPH Asia 2013 Emerging Technologies
    November 2013
    43 pages
    ISBN:9781450326322
    DOI:10.1145/2542284

    Copyright © 2013 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 19 November 2013

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate178of869submissions,20%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader