skip to main content
10.1145/2556195.2556204acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswsdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

On discovering non-obvious recommendations: using unexpectedness and neighborhood selection methods in collaborative filtering systems

Published: 24 February 2014 Publication History

Abstract

This paper proposes a number of studies in order to move the field of recommender systems beyond the traditional paradigm and the classical perspective of rating prediction accuracy. We contribute to existing helpful but less explored recommendation strategies and propose new approaches targeting to more useful recommendations for both users and businesses. Working toward this direction, we discuss the studies we have conducted so far and present our future research plans. The overall goal of this research program is to expand our focus from even more accurate rating predictions toward a more holistic experience for the users, by providing them with non-obvious but high quality recommendations and avoiding the over-specialization and concentration bias problems. In particular, we propose a new probabilistic neighborhood-based method as an improvement of the standard $k$-nearest neighbors approach, alleviating some of the most common problems of collaborative filtering recommender systems, based on classical metrics of dispersion and diversity as well as some newly proposed metrics. Furthermore, we propose a concept of unexpectedness in recommender systems and operationalize it by suggesting various mechanisms for specifying the expectations of the users and proposing a recommendation method for providing the users with unexpected but high quality personalized recommendations that fairly match their interests. Besides, in order to generate utility-based recommendations for Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) that better serve the educational needs of students, we study the satisfaction of users with online courses vis-a-vis student retention. Finally, we summarize the conclusions of the conducted studies, discuss the limitations of our work and also outline the managerial implications of the proposed stream of research.

References

[1]
Z. Abbassi, S. Amer-Yahia, L. V. Lakshmanan, S. Vassilvitskii, and C. Yu. Getting recommender systems to think outside the box. In RecSys '09, pages 285--288. ACM, 2009.
[2]
P. Adamopoulos. Beyond Rating Prediction Accuracy: On New Perspectives in Recommender Systems. In RecSys '13, pages 459--462. ACM, 2013.
[3]
P. Adamopoulos. What Makes a Great MOOC? An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Student Retention in Online Courses. In ICIS '13. AIS, 2013.
[4]
P. Adamopoulos and A. Tuzhilin. On Unexpectedness in Recommender Systems: Or How to Expect the Unexpected. In DiveRS 2011 - ACM RecSys 2011 Workshop on Novelty and Diversity in Recommender Systems, RecSys '11. ACM, 2011.
[5]
P. Adamopoulos and A. Tuzhilin. On Unexpectedness in Recommender Systems: Or How to Better Expect the Unexpected. Working Paper: CBA-13-03, New York University, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31832.
[6]
P. Adamopoulos and A. Tuzhilin. Probabilistic Neighborhood Selection in Collaborative Filtering Systems. Working Paper: CBA-13-04, New York University, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/2451/31988.
[7]
P. Adamopoulos and A. Tuzhilin. Recommendation Opportunities: Improving Item Prediction Using Weighted Percentile Methods in Collaborative Filtering Systems. In RecSys '13, pages 351--354. ACM, 2013.
[8]
G. Adomavicius and Y. Kwon. Improving aggregate recommendation diversity using ranking-based techniques. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 24(5):896--911, 2012.
[9]
G. Adomavicius and A. Tuzhilin. Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng., 17(6):734--749, 2005.
[10]
J. Y. Bakos. Reducing buyer search costs: implications for electronic marketplaces. Manage. Sci., 43(12):1676--1692, 1997.
[11]
M. Balabanović and Y. Shoham. Fab: content-based, collaborative recommendation. Communications of the ACM, 40(3):66--72, 1997.
[12]
W. J. Baumol and E. A. Ide. Variety in retailing. Management Science, 3(1):pp. 93--101, 1956.
[13]
R. M. Bell, J. Bennett, Y. Koren, and C. Volinsky. The million dollar programming prize. IEEE Spectr., 46(5):28--33, 2009.
[14]
D. Billsus and M. J. Pazzani. User modeling for adaptive news access. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 10(2--3):147--180, 2000.
[15]
E. Brynjolfsson, Y. J. Hu, and M. D. Smith. Consumer surplus in the digital economy: Estimating the value of increased product variety at online booksellers. Manage. Sci., 49(11):1580--1596, 2003.
[16]
P. Cremonesi, F. Garzotto, S. Negro, A. V. Papadopoulos, and R. Turrin. Looking for "good" recommendations: a comparative evaluation of recommender systems. In INTERACT '11, 2011.
[17]
D. Fleder and K. Hosanagar. Blockbuster culture's next rise or fall: The impact of recommender systems on sales diversity. Manage. Sci., 55(5):697--712, 2009.
[18]
M. Gorgoglione, U. Panniello, and A. Tuzhilin. The effect of context-aware recommendations on customer purchasing behavior and trust. In RecSys '11, pages 85--92. ACM, 2011.
[19]
D. Jannach, L. Lerche, F. Gedikli, and G. Bonnin. What recommenders recommend--an analysis of accuracy, popularity, and sales diversity effects. In UMAP '13, pages 25--37. Springer, 2013.
[20]
D. Jannach, M. Zanker, A. Felfernig, and G. Friedrich. Recommender systems: an introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
[21]
B. Kahn, D. Lehmann, and W. S. M. Dept. Modeling choice among assortments. Working paper (Wharton School. Marketing Dept.). Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Marketing Department, 1991.
[22]
J. A. Konstan, B. N. Miller, D. Maltz, J. L. Herlocker, L. R. Gordon, and J. Riedl. Grouplens: applying collaborative filtering to usenet news. Comm. of the ACM, 40(3), 1997.
[23]
J. A. Konstan and J. T. Riedl. Recommender systems: from algorithms to user experience. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 22:101--123, 2012.
[24]
Y. Koren, R. Bell, and C. Volinsky. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer, 42(8), 2009.
[25]
J. Masthoff. Group recommender systems: Combining individual models. In Recommender Systems Handbook, pages 677--702. Springer, 2011.
[26]
S. M. McNee, J. Riedl, and J. A. Konstan. Being accurate is not enough: how accuracy metrics have hurt recommender systems. In CHI '06, pages 1097--1101. ACM, 2006.
[27]
M. O'Connor, D. Cosley, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Polylens: a recommender system for groups of users. In ECSCW '01. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.
[28]
N. Tintarev and J. Masthoff. Designing and evaluating explanations for recommender systems. In Recommender Systems Handbook, pages 479--510. Springer, 2011.
[29]
C.-K. Wong and M. C. Easton. An efficient method for weighted sampling without replacement. SIAM Journal on Computing, 9(1):111--113, 1980.
[30]
K.-H. Yoo, U. Gretzel, and M. Zanker. Persuasive Recommender Systems: Conceptual Background and Implications. Springer, 2013.
[31]
T. Zhou, Z. Kuscsik, J.-G. Liu, M. Medo, J. R. Wakeling, and Y.-C. Zhang. Solving the apparent diversity-accuracy dilemma of recommender systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(10):4511--4515, 2010.
[32]
C.-N. Ziegler, S. M. McNee, J. A. Konstan, and G. Lausen. Improving recommendation lists through topic diversification. In WWW '05, pages 22--32. ACM, 2005.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. On discovering non-obvious recommendations: using unexpectedness and neighborhood selection methods in collaborative filtering systems

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Conferences
          WSDM '14: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining
          February 2014
          712 pages
          ISBN:9781450323512
          DOI:10.1145/2556195
          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Sponsors

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 24 February 2014

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. algorithm design
          2. recommender systems
          3. unexpectedness

          Qualifiers

          • Short-paper

          Conference

          WSDM 2014

          Acceptance Rates

          WSDM '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 64 of 355 submissions, 18%;
          Overall Acceptance Rate 498 of 2,863 submissions, 17%

          Upcoming Conference

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
          Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2023)Recommender Systems in CybersecurityKnowledge and Information Systems10.1007/s10115-023-01906-665:12(5523-5559)Online publication date: 5-Jun-2023
          • (2021)Demand-Aware Career Path RecommendationsManagement Science10.1287/mnsc.2020.372767:7(4362-4383)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021
          • (2021)Leveraging Multi-Faceted User Preferences for Improving Click-Through Rate PredictionsProceedings of the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3460231.3473899(864-868)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2021
          • (2021)To Your Surprise: Identifying Serendipitous CollaboratorsIEEE Transactions on Big Data10.1109/TBDATA.2019.29215677:3(574-589)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2021
          • (2020)End-to-End Neural Matching for Semantic Location Prediction of TweetsACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/341514939:1(1-35)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2020
          • (2020)Graph-based Regularization on Embedding Layers for RecommendationACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/341406739:1(1-27)Online publication date: 5-Sep-2020
          • (2020)Latent Unexpected RecommendationsACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology10.1145/340485511:6(1-25)Online publication date: 15-Sep-2020
          • (2020)PURS: Personalized Unexpected Recommender System for Improving User SatisfactionProceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems10.1145/3383313.3412238(279-288)Online publication date: 22-Sep-2020
          • (2019)Design and Development of a Custom System of Technology Surveillance and Competitive Intelligence in SMEsProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.177151(1231-1236)Online publication date: 2019
          • (2019)An intelligent approach for the design and development of a personalized system of knowledge representationProcedia Computer Science10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.176151(1225-1230)Online publication date: 2019
          • Show More Cited By

          View Options

          Login options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          Figures

          Tables

          Media

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media