skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557031acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A comparative study about children's and adults' perception of targeted web search engines

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe an eye-tracking study where we compare children's and adults' search behavior and perception of search interface elements on search engine results pages (SERPs) during an informational and a navigational search with Google and a search engine for children. Our first results indicate that children employ an exhaustive scanning strategy combined with cued visual jumps. Then they navigate to the next result page and only then modify their query. Adults only scan the first three results, following the F-shaped strategy, and immediately reformulate the query. Children pay less attention to textual summaries and more to thumbnails than adults do. Children take notice of a navigational menu with categories while adults do not.

References

  1. Bilal, D., and Kirby, J. Differences and similarities in information seeking: children and adults as Web users. Information Processing & Management 38, 5 (2002), 649--670. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Broder, A. A taxonomy of web search. SIGIR Forum 36, 2 (Sept. 2002), 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dinet, J., Bastien, J. M. C., and Kitajima, M. What, where and how are young people looking for in a search engine results page? impact of typographical cues and prior domain knowledge. In Conf. IHM '10, ACM (2010), 105--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Druin, A., Foss, E., Hutchinson, H., Golub, E., and Hatley, L. Children's roles using keyword search interfaces at home. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2010), 413--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gossen, T., Hempel, J., and Nürnberger, A. Find it if you can: usability case study of search engines for young users. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17, 8 (2013), 1593--1603. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gossen, T., Low, T., and Nürnberger, A. What are the real differences of children's and adults' web search. In Proc. of the 34th int. SIGIR conf. on Research and development in Information Retrieval, ACM (2011), 1115--1116. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jochmann-Mannak, H., Huibers, T., Lentz, L., and Sanders, T. Children searching information on the Internet: Performance on children's interfaces compared to Google. Towards Accessible Search Systems Workshop of the Int. SIGIR Conf. (July 2010), 27--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kammerer, Y., and Bohnacker, M. Children's web search with google: the effectiveness of natural language queries. In Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on Interaction Design and Children, ACM (2012), 184--187. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest. KIM-Studie 2010. Kinder+ Medien. Computer+ Internet. Stuttgart (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Nielsen, J., and Pernice, K. Eyetracking web usability. New Riders, London, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., and Inhelder, B. The psychology of the child, vol. 5001. Basic Books (AZ), 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rele, R. S., and Duchowski, A. T. Using eye tracking to evaluate alternative search results interfaces. Proc. of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 49, 15 (2005), 1459--1463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A comparative study about children's and adults' perception of targeted web search engines

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2014
        4206 pages
        ISBN:9781450324731
        DOI:10.1145/2556288

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 April 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader