ABSTRACT
Structured databases achieve effective searching and sorting by enacting sharply delineated category boundaries around their contents. While this enables precise retrieval, it also distorts identities that exist between category lines. A choice between Single and Married, for example, blurs distinctions within the Single group: single, perhaps, merely because same-sex marriage is not legal in one's locality. Sociologists Susan Leigh Star and Geoffrey Bowker describe such residual states as inevitable byproducts of information systems. To minimize residuality, traditional practice for descriptive metadata seeks to demarcate clear and objective classes. In this study, we use critical design to question this position by creating information collections that foreground the residual, instead of diminishing it. We then interrogate our design experiments with solicited critical responses from invited experts and student designers. Inspired by the anthropologist Tim Ingold, we argue that our experiments illuminate a form of interacting with databases characterized by notions of wayfaring, or inhabiting a space, as opposed to notions of transport, or reaching a known destination. We suggest that the form of coherence that shapes a wayfaring database is enacted through its flow, or fluid integration between structure and content.
- Anzaldua, G. (2012). Borderlands/La Frontera: the new mestiza. (4th ed.). San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.Google Scholar
- A. Telier. (Binder, T., et al.) (2011). Design Things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Bardzell. J. (2011). Interaction criticism. Interacting With Computers, 23, 604--621. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bardzell, J. and Bardzell, S. (2013). What is critical about critical design? Proc. ACM CHI 2013, 3297--3306. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bardzell, S., et al. (2012). Critical design and critical theory: The challenge of designing for provocation. Proc. ACM DIS 2012, 288--297. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dalsgaard, P., and Dindler, C. (2009). Peepholes as a means of engagement in interaction design. Proc. Nordes 2009: Engaging Artifacts.Google Scholar
- Dunne, A. (2006). Hertzian tales. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Gaver, W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S. (2003). Ambiguity as a resource for design. Proc. ACM CHI 2003, 233--240. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Geisler. G. Open Video Digital Library Toolkit. (Available at http://www.open-video-toolkit.org/)Google Scholar
- Ingold, T. (2007). Lines. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lowgren, J. and Stolterman, E. (2004). Thoughtful interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ratto, M. (2011). Critical making. The Information Society, 27(4), 252--260. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sengers, P. Boehner, K., David, S., and Kaye, J. (2005). Reflective design. Proc. AARHUS 2005, 49--58. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sengers, P. and Gaver, W. (2006). Staying open to interpretation. Proc. ACM DIS 2006, 99--108. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Star, S.L., and Bowker, G. (2007). Enacting silence: residual categories as a challenge for ethics, information systems, and communication. Ethics and Information Technology, 9, 273--280. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wilson, P. (1978). Two kinds of power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Always somewhere, never there: using critical design to understand database interactions
Recommendations
A Design Perspective on Data
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsEmpirical studies invariably show that data generation is situationally contingent and interpretively flexible, even when data is collected automatically. This essay situates data generation within a design perspective, demonstrating how data creation ...
Interaction criticism: a proposal and framework for a new discipline of hci
CHI EA '08: CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThough interaction designers critique interfaces as a regular part of their research and practice, the field of HCI lacks a proper discipline of interaction criticism. By interaction criticism we mean rigorous, evidence-based interpretive analysis that ...
Do You Have to Pee?: A Design Space for Intimate and Somatic Data
DIS '19: Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceThe management of bodily excretion is an everyday biological function necessary for our physiological and psychological well-being. In this paper, I investigate interaction design opportunities for and implications of leveraging intimate and somatic ...
Comments