skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557055acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Always somewhere, never there: using critical design to understand database interactions

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Structured databases achieve effective searching and sorting by enacting sharply delineated category boundaries around their contents. While this enables precise retrieval, it also distorts identities that exist between category lines. A choice between Single and Married, for example, blurs distinctions within the Single group: single, perhaps, merely because same-sex marriage is not legal in one's locality. Sociologists Susan Leigh Star and Geoffrey Bowker describe such residual states as inevitable byproducts of information systems. To minimize residuality, traditional practice for descriptive metadata seeks to demarcate clear and objective classes. In this study, we use critical design to question this position by creating information collections that foreground the residual, instead of diminishing it. We then interrogate our design experiments with solicited critical responses from invited experts and student designers. Inspired by the anthropologist Tim Ingold, we argue that our experiments illuminate a form of interacting with databases characterized by notions of wayfaring, or inhabiting a space, as opposed to notions of transport, or reaching a known destination. We suggest that the form of coherence that shapes a wayfaring database is enacted through its flow, or fluid integration between structure and content.

References

  1. Anzaldua, G. (2012). Borderlands/La Frontera: the new mestiza. (4th ed.). San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Telier. (Binder, T., et al.) (2011). Design Things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bardzell. J. (2011). Interaction criticism. Interacting With Computers, 23, 604--621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bardzell, J. and Bardzell, S. (2013). What is critical about critical design? Proc. ACM CHI 2013, 3297--3306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bardzell, S., et al. (2012). Critical design and critical theory: The challenge of designing for provocation. Proc. ACM DIS 2012, 288--297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Dalsgaard, P., and Dindler, C. (2009). Peepholes as a means of engagement in interaction design. Proc. Nordes 2009: Engaging Artifacts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunne, A. (2006). Hertzian tales. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gaver, W., Beaver, J., and Benford, S. (2003). Ambiguity as a resource for design. Proc. ACM CHI 2003, 233--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Geisler. G. Open Video Digital Library Toolkit. (Available at http://www.open-video-toolkit.org/)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ingold, T. (2007). Lines. London: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lowgren, J. and Stolterman, E. (2004). Thoughtful interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ratto, M. (2011). Critical making. The Information Society, 27(4), 252--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Sengers, P. Boehner, K., David, S., and Kaye, J. (2005). Reflective design. Proc. AARHUS 2005, 49--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sengers, P. and Gaver, W. (2006). Staying open to interpretation. Proc. ACM DIS 2006, 99--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Star, S.L., and Bowker, G. (2007). Enacting silence: residual categories as a challenge for ethics, information systems, and communication. Ethics and Information Technology, 9, 273--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Wilson, P. (1978). Two kinds of power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Always somewhere, never there: using critical design to understand database interactions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      4206 pages
      ISBN:9781450324731
      DOI:10.1145/2556288

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate465of2,043submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader