ABSTRACT
Many tasks call for efficient user interaction under time delay-controlling space instruments, piloting remote aircraft and operating search and rescue robots. In this paper we identify an underexplored design opportunity for building robotic teleoperation user interfaces following an evaluation of operator performance during a time-delayed robotic arm block-stacking task in twenty-two participants. More delay resulted in greater operator hesitation and a decreased ratio of active to inactive input. This ratio can serve as a useful proxy for measuring an operator's ability to anticipate the outcome of their control inputs before receiving delayed visual feedback. High anticipatory input ratio (AIR) scores indicate times when robot operators enter commands before waiting for visual feedback. Low AIR scores highlight when operators must wait for visual feedback before continuing. We used this measurement to help us identify particular sub-tasks where operators would likely benefit from additional support.
- Imaida, Takashi, et al. "Ground-space bilateral teleoperation of ETS-VII robot arm by direct bilateral coupling under 7-s time delay condition." Robotics and Automation, IEEE Transactions on 20.3 (2004)Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wilcox, Brian H. "Robotic vehicles for planetary exploration." Applied Intelligence 2.2 (1992): 181--193.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Norman, Donald A. "Design rules based on analyses of human error." Communications of the ACM 26.4 (1983): 254--258. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sorensen, Khalid L., Joshua B. Spiers, and William E. Singhose. "Operational effects of crane interface devices." Industrial Electronics and Applications, 2007. ICIEA 2007. 2nd IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 2007.Google Scholar
- International Organization for Standardization, 2011, ISO 7752/2--2011/Addendum 1 Lifting Appliances, Controls, Layout and Characteristics. Part 2: Basic Arrangement and Requirements for Mobile Cranes.Google Scholar
- Sheridan, Thomas B. "Space teleoperation through time delay: review and prognosis." Robotics and Automation, IEEE Transactions on 9.5 (1993): 592--606.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bejczy, Antal K., et al. "Role of computer graphics in space telerobotics: Preview and predictive displays." Fibers' 91, Boston, MA. SPIE, 1991.Google Scholar
- Veltman, Hans, and Arjen Oving. Augmenting camera images for operators of unmanned aerial vehicles. No. RTO-MP-088. HUMAN FACTORS RESEARCH INST TNO SOESTERBERG (NETHERLANDS), 2003.Google Scholar
- Thurling, Andrew J. Improving UAV handling qualities using time delay compensation. No. AFIT/GAB/ENY/00M-01. AIR FORCE INST OF TECH WRIGHT-PATTERSONAFB OH, 2000.Google Scholar
- de Vries, S. C. UAVs and control delays. No. TNODV3--2005-A054. TNO DEFENCE SECURITY AND SAFETY SOESTERBERG (NETHERLANDS), 2005.Google Scholar
- O'HARA, KENTON P., and Stephen J. Payne. "Planning and the user interface: The effects of lockout time and error recovery cost." International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 50.1 (1999): 41--59. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lane, J. Corde, Craig R. Carignan, and David L. Akin. "Advanced operator interface design for complex space telerobots." Autonomous robots 11.1 (2001): 49--58. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dix, Alan J. "The Myth of the Infinitely Fast Machine." BCS HCI. 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steinfeld, Aaron, et al. "Common metrics for humanrobot interaction." Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steinfeld, Aaron. "Interface lessons for fully and semiautonomous mobile robots." Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA'04. 2004 IEEE International Conference on. Vol. 3. IEEE, 2004.Google Scholar
- Niemeyer, Günter, and Jean-Jacques E. Slotine. "Telemanipulation with time delays." The International Journal of Robotics Research 23.9 (2004): 873--890.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Held, Richard, and Nathaniel Durlach. "Telepresence, time delay and adaptation." Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (1991): 232--246. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chen, Jessie YC, Ellen C. Haas, and Michael J. Barnes. "Human performance issues and user interface design for teleoperated robots." Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C: Applications and Reviews, IEEE Transactions on 37.6 (2007): 1231--1245. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kaber, David B., et al. "Effects of visual interface design, and control mode and latency on performance, telepresence and workload in a teleoperation task." Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Vol. 44. No. 5. SAGE Publications, 2000Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Measuring operator anticipatory inputs in response to time-delay for teleoperated human-robot interfaces
Recommendations
Ethologically inspired human-robot interaction interfaces
HCCE '12: Proceedings of the 2012 Joint International Conference on Human-Centered Computer EnvironmentsThis paper presents human-robot interaction interfaces based on ethological studies. An ethological test procedure was modeled with the application of a fuzzy rule interpolation based fuzzy automaton. This fuzzy automaton was loaded with rules formed ...
Whole-Body Motion Generation Integrating Operator's Intention and Robot's Autonomy in Controlling Humanoid Robots
This paper introduces a framework for whole-body motion generation integrating operator's control and robot's autonomous functions during online control of humanoid robots. Humanoid robots are biped machines that usually possess multiple degrees of ...
A mobile robot with autonomous climbing and descending of stairs
Mobile robots are used to operate in urban environments, for surveillance, reconnaissance, and inspection, as well as for military operations and in hazardous environments. Some are intended for exploration of only natural terrains, but others also for ...
Comments