skip to main content
10.1145/2556288.2557234acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Expanding touch input vocabulary by using consecutive distant taps

Published: 26 April 2014 Publication History

Abstract

In recent years, touch screens have emerged and matured as the main input interface for mobile and tablet computers calling for extended touch input possibilities. In this paper, we explore the use of consecutive distant taps to expand the touch screen input vocabulary. We analyzed time intervals and distances between consecutive taps during common applications on a tablet and verified that consecutive distant taps can be used conflict-free with existing touch gestures. We designed the two interaction techniques Ta-tap and Ta-Ta-tap that utilize consecutive distant taps. Ta-tap uses two consecutive distant taps to invoke alternative touch operations for multi-touch emulation, whereas Ta-Ta-tap uses a series of consecutive distant taps to define a spatial gesture. We verified the feasibility of both interaction techniques through a series of experiments and a user study. The high recognition rate of Ta-tap and Ta-Ta-tap gestures, the few conflicts with existing gestures, and the positive feedback from the participants assert the potential of consecutive distant taps as a new design space to enrich touch screen interactions.

Supplementary Material

suppl.mov (pn1473-file3.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Adams, A. and Cox, A. L. Questionnaires, in-depth interviews and focus groups. In P. Cairns and A. L. Cox, eds., Research Methods for Human Computer Interaction. Cambridge University Press (2008), 17--34.
[2]
Benko, H., Wilson, A., and Baudisch, P. Precise selection techniques for multi-touch screens. In proc. CHI '06, ACM (2006), 1263--1272.
[3]
Bonnet, D., Appert, C., and Beaudouin-Lafon, M. Extending the Vocabulary of Touch Events with ThumbRock. In proc. GI '13, ACM (2013).
[4]
Boring, S., Ledo, D., Chen, X., Marquardt, N., Tang, A., and Greenberg, S. The Fat Thumb: Using the Thumb's Contact Size for Single-Handed Mobile Interaction. In proc. MobileHCI '12, ACM (2012), 39--48.
[5]
Davidson, P. L. and Han, J. Y. Extending 2D object arrangement with pressure-sensitive layering cues. In proc. UIST '08, ACM (2008), 87--90.
[6]
Findlater, L., Wobbrock, J. O. and Wigdor, D. Typing on flat glass: examining ten-finger expert typing patterns on touch surfaces. In proc. CHI '11, ACM (2011), 2453--2462.
[7]
Forlines, C., Wigdor, D., Shen, C., and Balakrishnan, R. Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays. In proc. CHI '07, ACM (2007), 647--656.
[8]
Goel, M., Wobbrock, J. O., and Patel, S. N. GripSense: Using Built-In Sensors to Detect Hand Posture and Pressure on Commodity Mobile Phones. In proc. UIST '12, ACM (2012), 545--554.
[9]
Gustafson, S., Holz, C., and Baudisch, P. Imaginary Phone: learning imaginary interfaces by transferring spatial memory from a familiar device. In proc. UIST '11, ACM (2011), 283--292.
[10]
Harrison, C. and Hudson, S. Using Shear as a Supplemental Two-Dimensional Input Channel for Rich Touchscreen Interaction. In proc. CHI '12, ACM (2012), 3149--3152.
[11]
Harrison, C., Schwarz, J. and Hudson, S. E. TapSense: enhancing finger interaction on touch surfaces. In proc. UIST '11, ACM (2011), 627--634.
[12]
Heo, S. and Lee, G. Force gestures: augmenting touch screen gestures with normal and tangential forces. In proc. UIST '11, ACM (2011), 621--626.
[13]
Heo, S. and Lee, G. ForceTap: extending the input vocabulary of mobile touch screens by adding tap gestures. In proc. MobileHCI '11, ACM (2011), 113--122.
[14]
Heo, S. and Lee, G. Indirect shear force estimation for multi-point shear force operations. In proc. CHI '13, ACM (2013), 281--284.
[15]
Hinckley, K. and Song, H. Sensor synaesthesia: touch in motion, and motion in touch. In proc. CHI '11, ACM (2011), 801--810.
[16]
Karat, J., McDonald, J. E., and Anderson, M. A comparison of menu selection techniques: touch panel, mouse and keyboard. International Journal of ManMachine Studies 25, 1 (1986), 73--88.
[17]
Kin, K., Agrawala, M., and DeRose, T. Determining the benefits of direct-touch, bimanual, and multifinger input on a multitouch workstation. In proc. GI '09, Canadian Information Processing Society (2009), 119--124.
[18]
Microsoft MSDN, http://msdn.microsoft.com/enus/library/windows/desktop/bb760404(v=vs.85).aspx
[19]
Miyaki, T. and Rekimoto, J. GraspZoom: zooming and scrolling control model for single-handed mobile interaction. In proc. MobileHCI '09, ACM (2009), 11:1--11:4.
[20]
Müller, H., Gove, J., and Webb, J. Understanding Tablet Use: A Multi-Method Exploration. In proc. MobileHCI '12, ACM (2012), 1--10.
[21]
Myers, C. S. and Rabiner, L. R. A comparative study of several dynamic time-warping algorithms for connected word recognition. The Bell System Technical J. 60, 7 (1981), 1389--1409.
[22]
Research In Motion™, SurePress™ Technology. http://us.blackberry.com/specifications/communication/surepress-touch-screen.html
[23]
Roth, V. and Turner, T., Bezel swipe: conflict-free scrolling and multiple selection on mobile touch screen devices. In proc. CHI '09, ACM (2009), 1523--1526.
[24]
Roudaut, A., Lecolinet, E., and Guiard, Y. MicroRolls: expanding touch-screen input vocabulary by distinguishing rolls vs. slides of the thumb. In proc. CHI '09, ACM (2009), 927--936.
[25]
Rubine, D. Specifying gestures by example. In proc. SIGGRAPH '91, ACM (1991), 329--337.
[26]
Sears, A. and Shneiderman, B. High precision touchscreens: design strategies and comparisons with a mouse. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 34, 4 (1991), 593--613.
[27]
Serrano, M., Lecolinet, E., and Guiard, Y. Bezel-Tap gestures: quick activation of commands from sleep mode on tablets. In proc. CHI '13, ACM (2013), 3027--3036.
[28]
Wagner, J., Huot, S., and Mackay, W. BiTouch and BiPad: designing bimanual interaction for hand-held tablets. In proc. CHI '12, ACM (2012), 2317--2326.
[29]
Wang, F., and Ren, X. Empirical evaluation for finger input properties in multi-touch interaction. In proc. CHI '09, ACM (2009), 1063--1072.
[30]
Wang, F., Cao, X., Ren, X., and Irani, P. Detecting and leveraging finger orientation for interaction with directtouch surfaces, In proc. UIST '09, ACM (2009), 23--32.
[31]
Wobbrock, J., Wilson, A., and Li, Y. Gestures without libraries, toolkits or training: a $1 recognizer for user interface prototypes. In Proc. UIST '07, ACM (2007), 159--168.
[32]
Zhao, S., Maneesh, A., and Hinckley, K. Zone and polygon menus: using relative position to increase the breadth of multi-stroke marking menus, In Proc. CHI '06, ACM (2006), 1077--1086.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Interactive Mediation Techniques for Error-Aware Gesture Input SystemsProceedings of the 50th Graphics Interface Conference10.1145/3670947.3670964(1-12)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2024)User Performance in Consecutive Temporal Pointing: An Exploratory StudyProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642904(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)Behavioral Differences between Tap and Swipe: Observations on Time, Error, Touch-point Distribution, and Trajectory for Tap-and-swipe Enabled TargetsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642272(1-12)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Expanding touch input vocabulary by using consecutive distant taps

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2014
    4206 pages
    ISBN:9781450324731
    DOI:10.1145/2556288
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 26 April 2014

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. command shortcut
    2. consecutive distant taps
    3. ta-ta-tap
    4. ta-tap
    5. touch screen

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '14
    Sponsor:
    CHI '14: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2014
    Ontario, Toronto, Canada

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 465 of 2,043 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)28
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Interactive Mediation Techniques for Error-Aware Gesture Input SystemsProceedings of the 50th Graphics Interface Conference10.1145/3670947.3670964(1-12)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
    • (2024)User Performance in Consecutive Temporal Pointing: An Exploratory StudyProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642904(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Behavioral Differences between Tap and Swipe: Observations on Time, Error, Touch-point Distribution, and Trajectory for Tap-and-swipe Enabled TargetsProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642272(1-12)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2023)Single-tap Latency Reduction with Single- or Double- tap PredictionProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042717:MHCI(1-26)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
    • (2023)Exploring Visual Signifier Characteristics to Improve the Perception of Affordances of In-Place Touch InputsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042577:MHCI(1-32)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
    • (2021)False Positives vs. False NegativesThe 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology10.1145/3472749.3474735(54-68)Online publication date: 10-Oct-2021
    • (2020)ScraTouchProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies10.1145/34118314:3(1-19)Online publication date: 4-Sep-2020
    • (2020)PredicTaps: Latency Reduction Technique for Single-taps Based on Recognition for Single-tap or Double-tapExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3334480.3382933(1-9)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2020
    • (2020)ScraTouchExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3334480.3382858(1-10)Online publication date: 25-Apr-2020
    • (2019)Expanding One-Handed Touch Input Vocabulary Using Index Finger on and Above Back-of-DeviceProceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction10.1145/3369457.3369537(585-589)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2019
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media