Colin M. Gray
ABSTRACT
There has been increasing interest in the adoption of UX within corporate environments, and what competencies translate into effective UX design. This paper addresses the space between pedagogy and UX practice through the lens of competence, with the goal of understanding how students are initiated into the practice community, how their perception of competence shifts over time, and what factors influence this shift. A 12-week longitudinal data collection, including surveys and interviews, documents this shift, with participants beginning internships and full-time positions in UX. Students and early professionals were asked to assess their level of competence and factors that influenced competence. A co-construction of identity between the designer and their environment is proposed, with a variety of factors relating to tool and representational knowledge, complexity, and corporate culture influencing perceptions of competence in UX over time. Opportunities for future research, particularly in building an understanding of competency in UX based on this preliminary framing of early UX practice are addressed.
- Arvola, M. and Artman, H. Studio life: The construction of digital design competence. Digital Kompetanse 3, 2 (2008), 78--96.Google Scholar
- Bærentsen, K.B. and Slavensky, H. A contribution to the Design Process. Comm. of the ACM 42, 5 (1999), 72--77. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Blokhuis, F.T.L. Evidence-based design of workplace learning. University of Twente, 2006.Google Scholar
- Bødker, S., Ehn, P., Sjögren, D. and Sundblad, Y. Cooperative design perspectives on 20 years with the Scandinavian IT Design Model?. Proc. NordiCHI, (2000), 22--24.Google Scholar
- Brandt, C.B., Cennamo, K., Douglas, S., Vernon, M., McGrath, M. and Reimer, Y. A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, (2011).Google Scholar
- Buur, J. and Bødker, S. From usability lab to "design collaboratorium": reframing usability practice. Proc. DIS, ACM (2000), 297--307. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cross, N. Expertise in design: an overview. Design Studies 25, 5 (2004), 427--441.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dorst, K. Design research: a revolution-waiting-tohappen. Design Studies 29, 1 (2008), 4--11.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dreyfus, S.E. Formal models vs. human situational understanding: Inherent limitations on the modeling of business expertise (ORC 81--3). Berkeley: Operations Research Center, University of California, (1981).Google Scholar
- Friedland, L., Innes, J., Longoria, R., Hom, W., Henry, P. and Anderson, R. Outsourcing & offshoring: impact on the user experience. Proc. CHI, ACM (2005), 11701171. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gobert, D., Howlett, V., Snyder, C., Tamler, H., Tullis, T.S. and Wilson, C. What the best usability specialists are made of. Proc. CHI, ACM (2002), 706--707. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gray, C.M. Informal peer critique and the negotiation of habitus in a design studio. DRS // CUMULUS, (2013), 702--714.Google Scholar
- Holmlid, S. and Arvola, M. 2007. Developing a thematic design curriculum as a Bologna master. International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (2007), 13--14.Google Scholar
- Horváth, I. Design competence development in an academic virtual enterprise. Proc. IDETC/CIE, (2006), 1013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hundhausen, C. D., Narayanan, N. H., and Crosby, M. E. Exploring studio-based instructional models for computing education. Proc. SIGCSE, 2008, 392--396 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Knight, P. and Page, A. The assessment of wicked competences: Report to the Practice-based Professional Learning Centre. 2007.Google Scholar
- Koutsabasis, P. and Vosinakis, S. Rethinking HCI Education for Design: Problem-Based Learning and Virtual Worlds at an HCI Design Studio. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 28, 8 (2012), 485--499.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lawson, B. Schemata, gambits and precedent: some factors in design expertise. Design Studies 25, 5 (2004), 443--457.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morelli, N. Globalised Markets and Localised Needs. Educating Designers for a Global Context, (2006).Google Scholar
- Nelson, H.G. and Stolterman, E. The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. MIT Press, Cambridge, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nieminen, M.P., Runonen, M., Nieminen, M. and Tyllinen, M. Designer experience: exploring ways to design in experience. Proc. CHI, ACM (2011), 2449--2452. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Olsson, E. What active users and designers contribute in the design process. Interacting with computers 16, 2 (2004), 377--401.Google Scholar
- Polanyi, M. The tacit dimension. Anchor Books, Garden City, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
- Reimer, Y.J. and Douglas, S.A. Teaching HCI design with the studio approach. Computer Science Education 13, 3 (2003), 191--205.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rychen, D.S. and Salganik, L.H. A holistic model of competence. In Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society. Hogrefe & Huber, Göttingen, Germany, 2003, 41--62.Google Scholar
- Schön, D.A. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
- Siegel, M.A. and Stolterman, E. Metamorphosis: Transforming Non-designers into Designers. In Proc. DRS. Sheffield, UK, 2008, 378:1--13.Google Scholar
- Stolterman, E. and Pierce, J. Design tools in practice: studying the designer-tool relationship in interaction design. Proc. DIS, (2012), 25--28. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Szóstek, A. A look into some practices behind Microsoft UX management. Proc. CHI, ACM (2012), 605--618. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thompson, C.F., Anderson, R.I., Au, I., Ratzlaff, C. and Zada, N. Managing user experience: managing change. Proc. CHI, ACM (2010), 3143--3146. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Trier, U.P. Defining educational goals: A window to the future. In D.S. Rychen and L.H. Salganik, editor., Defining and selecting key competencies. Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, WA, 2001, 241--246.Google Scholar
- Vickers, S.G. Judgment. In The Vickers Papers. Harper & Row, London, 1984, 230--245.Google Scholar
- Weinert, F.E. Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D.S. Rychen and L.A. Salganik, editor, Defining and selecting key competencies. Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle, WA, 2001, 45--66Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Evolution of design competence in UX practice
Recommendations
The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX Design
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsInterest in critical scholarship that engages with the complexity of user experience (UX) practice is rapidly expanding, yet the vocabulary for describing and assessing criticality in practice is currently lacking. In this paper, we outline and explore ...
A Practice-Led Account of the Conceptual Evolution of UX Knowledge
CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe contours of user experience (UX) design practice have been shaped by a diverse array of practitioners and disciplines, resulting in a diffuse and decentralized body of UX-specific disciplinary knowledge. The rapidly shifting space that UX knowledge ...
Flow of Competence in UX Design Practice
CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsUX and design culture are beginning to dominate corporate priorities, but despite the current hype there is often a disconnect between the organizational efficiencies desired by executives and the knowledge of how UX can or should address these issues. ...
Comments