skip to main content
10.1145/2557977.2558088acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicuimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

DRAS.264: a dynamic retry adaptation scheme to improve transmission of H.264 HD video over 802.11 peer-to-peer networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 January 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Wireless High Definition Video Transmission (WHDVT) over 802.11-based networks enjoys widespread deployment among today's multimedia solutions. Examples include Intel's WiDiand Apple's Airplay, to name a few. In these systems, peer-to-peer networks are established over which H.264-encoded video is transported wirelessly to be decoded and played back at the receiving node. Built-in reliability at the IEEE 802.11 Medium Access Control (MAC) layer retransmits lost packets up to a default number of retries. Excessive delay induced by such retransmissions can violate the tight playout deadlines for HD content. Furthermore, lower priority packets may be delivered at the expense of delaying other packets of higher visual impact on the displayed video. To mitigate this problem, this paper proposes Dynamic Retry Adaptation Scheme (DRAS.264) tailored to today's compression standard of choice--the H.264/AVC codec. DRAS.264 parses H.264 bitstreams on-the-fly to dynamically adjust retransmission limits at the MAC layer. Simulation results show significant PSNR improvements (over 10 dBs) for stretches of received video under DRAS.264 over the default MAC layer operation.

References

  1. http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/intel-wireless-display.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. http://www.apple.com/airplay/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. http://www.videolan.org/developers/x264.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. IEEE Std 802.11#8482;-2007, IEEE Standard for Information Technology-Telecommunications and information exchange between systems-Local and metropolitan area networks-Specific requirements, June 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C.-M. Chen, C.-W. Lin, and Y.-C. Chen. Cross-Layer Packet Retry Limit Adaptation for Video Transport Over Wireless LANs. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 20(11):1448--1461, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Greengrass, J. Evans, and A. Begen. Not All Packets Are Equal, Part 2: The Impact of Network Packet Loss on Video Quality. IEEE Internet Computing, 13(2):74--82, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Gross, J. Klaue, H. Karl, and A. Wolisz. Cross-layer optimization of OFDM transmission systems for mpeg-4 video streaming. Computer Communications, 27(11):1044--1055, 2004. Applications and Services in Wireless Networks. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Hannuksela and T. Wiegand. H.264/AVC in Wireless Environments. Circuits and Systems, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. C. Lee, M. Kim, S. Hyun, S. Lee, B. Lee, and K. Lee. OEFMON: An open evaluation framework for multimedia over networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(9):153--161, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Q. Li and M. van der Schaar. Providing adaptive QoS to layered video over wireless local area networks through real-time retry limit adaptation. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 6(2):278--290, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Lu and P. Steenkiste. A time-based adaptive retry strategy for video streaming in 802.11 WLANs. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. I. E. Richardson. The H.264 Advanced Video Compression Standard, Second Edition. Wiley, Mar. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Scalable Network Technologies, Inc. QualNet 5.0.2 User's Guide, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P. Seeling and M. Reisslein. Video Transport Evaluation With H.264 Video Traces. Communications Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE, PP(99):1--24, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. van der Schaar, D. Turaga, and R. Wong. Classification-Based System For Cross-Layer Optimized Wireless Video Transmission. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 8(5):1082--1095, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. van der Schaar and D. S. Turaga. Cross-Layer Packetization and Retransmission Strategies for Delay-Sensitive Wireless Multimedia Transmission. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 9(1):185--197, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Y.-K. Wang, R. Even, T. Kristensen, and R. Jesup. RTP Payload Format for H.264 Video. RFC 6184 (Proposed Standard), May 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Zhao, B. Lee, T.-W. Lee, C.-G. Kim, J.-K. Shin, and J. Cho. Flexible dual tcp/udp streaming for h.264 hd video over wlans. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, ICUIMC '13, pages 34:1--34:9, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. DRAS.264: a dynamic retry adaptation scheme to improve transmission of H.264 HD video over 802.11 peer-to-peer networks

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  ICUIMC '14: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication
                  January 2014
                  757 pages
                  ISBN:9781450326445
                  DOI:10.1145/2557977

                  Copyright © 2014 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 9 January 2014

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • research-article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  ICUIMC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate116of407submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate251of941submissions,27%

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader