skip to main content
10.1145/2559206.2579414acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing ballot interfaces for voters with vision disabilities

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Current accessible audio voting requires additional button controls to select candidates and scroll through the ballot, which result in significantly longer completion time for casting a ballot compared to sighted voters. Instead of adding accessibility to the finished product, this study has designed two ballot interfaces using a universal design approach. In this paper, I present the design of a ballot interface using universal design approach, formative user study, refined ballot features, and on-going future work.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Bonner, M., Brudvik, J., Abowd, G., & Edwards, W. K. No-Look Notes: Accessible Eyes-Free Multi-touch Text Entry. Pervasive Computing, IEEE, 6030 (2010), 409--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Chaudry, B. M., Connelly, K. H., Siek, K. A., & Welch, J. L. Mobile interface design for low-literacy populations. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGHIT International Health Informatics Symposium, Miami, Florida, USA, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Connell BR, Jones M, Mace R, Mueller J, Mullick A, Ostroff E, et al. The Principles of Universal Design. 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gilbert J, McMillian Y, Rouse K, Williams P, Rogers G, McClendon J, et al. Universal access in e-voting for the blind. Universal Access in the Information Society. 9(4) (2010), 357--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Guerreiro, T., Lagoa, P., Nicolau, H., Gonalves, D., & Jorge, J. A. From Tapping to Touching: Making Touch Screens Accessible to Blind Users. Multimedia, IEEE, 15(4) (2008), 48--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jin, Z., Plocher, T., & Kiff, L. Touch Screen User Interfaces for Older Adults: Button Size and Spacing. Universal Acess in Human Computer Interaction. Coping with Diversity. C. Stephanidis, Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 4554 (2007) , 933--941. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kane, Shaun K., Bigham, Jeffrey P., & Wobbrock, Jacob O. Slide rule: making mobile touch screens accessible to blind people using multi-touch interaction techniques. ASSESTS'10, Orlando, FL, USA, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Lee, S., Xiong, X., Yilin, L., & Sanford, J. EZ ballot with multimodal inputs and outputs. ASSESTS'12, Bourlder, Colorado, USA, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Leporini, Barbara, Buzzi, Maria Claudia, & Buzzi, Marina. Interacting with mobile devices via VoiceOver: usability and accessibility issues. Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. McGookin, David, Brewster, Stephen, & Jiang, WeiWei. Investigating touchscreen accessibility for people with visual impairments. Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: building bridges (2008), 298--307. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Oliveira, J., Guerreiro, T., Nicolau, H., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. Blind people and mobile touch-based text-entry: acknowledging the need for different flavors. ASSESTS'11, Dundee, Scotland, UK, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Parikh, T., Ghosh, K., & Chavan, A. Design studies for a financial management system for micro-credit groups in rural india. Proceedings of the Universal usability, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Piner, G., & Byrne, M. Accessible polling places for the visually impaired: a compilation of survey results. Proceedings of the Electronic voting technology/workshop on trustworthy elections, San Francisco, CA, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Runyan, Noel. Improving Access to Voting. A Report on the Technology for Accessible Voting Systems, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Vanderheiden, G. C. Using extended and enhanced usability (EEU) to provide access to mainstream electronic voting machines. Information Technology and Disabilities (2004), X(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Designing ballot interfaces for voters with vision disabilities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '14: CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2014
      2620 pages
      ISBN:9781450324748
      DOI:10.1145/2559206

      Copyright © 2014 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 April 2014

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI EA '14 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of3,200submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader