skip to main content
10.1145/2559206.2581213acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

A methodological inquiry into predictors of consumer satisfaction

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Several theories of consumer satisfaction, e.g., Contrast [6]; Expectation Disconfirmation [13], report that satisfaction is predicted by the discrepancy between pre-purchase expectations, and actual product performance. Whereas, satisfaction can be indexed using emotion-based measures [13] - Product performance, on the other hand, has been evaluated using a variety of indices (e.g., direct evaluation, brand norm). In the current investigation, we were interested in evaluating product performance using a less conventional methodological approach in order to explore specific product attributes and their predictive influence on satisfaction in the communications market. Customers completed an online survey regarding their experience with the iPad, and then provided emotion-based satisfaction ratings, as well as open- and closed-ended performance feedback. Several converging analyses reveal that negative product feedback predicted lower satisfaction scores, and furthermore, only the product attributes of reliability and navigation negatively predicted satisfaction.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Anderson, R.E. Consumer dissatisfaction: The effect of disconfirmed expectancy on perceived product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (1973), 38--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bettman, J.R. Memory factors in consumer choice: A review. Journal of Marketing, 43 (1979), 37--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Cardozo, R.N., 1965. An experimental study of consumer effort, expectation, and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 2 (1965), 244--249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlsmith, J., & Aronson, E. Some hedonic consequences of the confirmation and disconfirmation of expectancies. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 66, 2 (1963), 151.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Cronin Jr., J., & Taylor, S. A. Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension. Journal of Marketing, 56, 3 (1992), 55--68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Engel, J. F. Kollat, D. T., & Blackwell, R. D. Consumer Behavior (second ed.). 1973. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Festinger, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. 1957. New York: Harper & Row.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fornell, C. A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience. Journal of Marketing, (1992), 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fornell, C., Johnson, M.D., Anderson, E.W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. The American customer satisfaction index: Description, findings, and implications. Journal of Marketing, 60 (1996), 7--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Hovland, C. I., Harvey, O. J., & Sherif, M. Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 55, 2 (1957), 244--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Howard, J.A. Consumer behavior in marketing strategy. 1989. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Howard, J.A. and J.N. Sheth. The Theory of Buying Behavior. 1969. New York: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Oliver, R. L. A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 4 (1980), 460--469.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Oliver, R. L. Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. 2010. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Olshavsky, R.N. & Miller, J.A. Consumer expectations, product performance, and perceived product quality. Journal of Marketing, 9 (1972), 19--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Olson, T.C. & Dover, P. Effects of expectation creation and disconfirmation on belief elements of cognitive structure. In B.B. Anderson (Ed.). Advances in Consumer Research, Volume III. 1976. Chicago, IL: Association for Consumer Research. pp. 168--175.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Selnes, F. An examination of the effect of product performance on brand reputation, satisfaction and loyalty. European Journal of Marketing, 27, 9 (1993), 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Weaver, D., & Brickman, P. Expectancy, feedback, and disconfirmation as independent factors in outcome satisfaction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 30, 3 (1974), 420--428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. West, K. Ten factors that affect customer satisfaction. www.nbrii.com. Retrieved, January 2, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A methodological inquiry into predictors of consumer satisfaction

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI EA '14: CHI '14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2014
        2620 pages
        ISBN:9781450324748
        DOI:10.1145/2559206

        Copyright © 2014 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 April 2014

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI EA '14 Paper Acceptance Rate1,000of3,200submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader