skip to main content
10.1145/2559636.2559669acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

May i talk about other shops here?: modeling territory and invasion in front of shops

Published: 03 March 2014 Publication History

Abstract

This paper models the concept of the "territory" of shops. First, we interviewed three shopkeepers and found that they perceived the space near their shop as their territory and that they interpreted some types of behaviors as invasive. Second, we confirmed that potential visitors share this notion of territory. We also confirmed that the size of the territory depends on the characteristics of a shop's facade. While there is little territory in front of walls, there is more territory in front of shelves and entrances. Our robot traversed around two real shopping malls that included 50 shops and took 3-D scans of their environment shapes. Each shop's facade was analyzed and the shop territory was computed. The computation results match people's perception. The recognition rate accuracy reached 93.5% for the territory areas. User evaluations in a virtual shop environment confirmed that a robot with a territory model behaves better than one without it.

Supplementary Material

suppl.mov (hrifp187.mov)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Borrmann, D., Elseberg, J., Lingemann, K. and Nuchter, A., 2011, The 3D Hough Transform for Plane Detection in Point Clouds - A Review and A new Accumulator Design, Journal 3D Research, vol. 2,
[2]
Brower, S. N., 1980, Territory in urban settings, Culture and Environment. Human behavior and environment, vol. 4, pp. 179--207.
[3]
Chang, C.-C. and Lin, C.-J., 2001, LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines, ed.
[4]
Edney, J. J., 1974, Human Territoriality, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 81, pp. 959--975.
[5]
Gross, H.-M., Boehme, H.-J., Schroeter, C., Mueller, S., Koenig, A., Martin, C., Merten, M. and Bley, A., 2008, ShopBot: progress in developing an interactive mobile shopping assistant for everyday use, IEEE Int. Conf. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC2008), pp. 3471--3478.
[6]
Haber, G. M., 1980, Territorial Invasion in the Classroom Invadee Response, Environment and Behavior, vol. 12, pp. 17--31.
[7]
Hall, E. T., 1966, The Hidden Dimension, Doubleday.
[8]
Iwamura, Y., Shiomi, M., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H. and Hagita, N., 2011, Do Elderly People Prefer a Conversational Humanoid as a Shopping Assistant Partner in Supermarkets?, ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI2011), pp. 449--456.
[9]
Jansen-Osmann, P. and Berendt, B., 2005, What makes a route appear longer? An experimental perspective on features, route segmentation, and distance knowledge, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 58A, pp. 1390--1414.
[10]
Kitade, T., Satake, S., Kanda, T. and Imai, M., 2013, Understanding suitable locations for waiting, in Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, ed: IEEE Press, pp. 57--64.
[11]
Mallot, H. A., Gillner, S., van Veen, H. A. and Bülthoff, H. H., 1998, Behavioral experiments in spatial cognition using virtual reality, in Spatial cognition, ed: Springer, pp. 447--467.
[12]
Michalowski, M. P., Sabanovic, S. and Simmons, R., 2006, A Spatial Model of Engagement for a Social Robot, IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, pp. 762--767.
[13]
Mozos, Ó. M., Triebel, R., Jensfelt, P., Rottmann, A. and Burgard, W., 2007, Supervised semantic labeling of places using information extracted from sensor data, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 55, pp. 391--402.
[14]
Riecke, B. E., Bodenheimer, B., McNamara, T. P., Williams, B., Peng, P. and Feuereissen, D., 2010, Do we need to walk for effective virtual reality navigation? physical rotations alone may suffice, in Spatial Cognition VII, Springer, pp. 234--247.
[15]
Ruback, R. B., 1987, Deserted (and Nondeserted) Aisles: Territorial Intrusion Can Produce Persistence, Not Flight, Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 50, pp. 270--276.
[16]
Ruback, R. B. and Juieng, D., 1997, Territorial Defense in Parking Lots: Retaliation Against Walting Drivers, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 27, pp. 821--834.
[17]
Sebba, R. and Churchman, A., 1983, Territories and Territoriality in the Home, Environment and Behavior, vol. 15, pp. 191--210.
[18]
Siegwart, R., Arras, K. O., Bouabdallah, S., Burnier, D., Froidevaux, G., Greppin, X., Jensen, B., Lorotte, A., Mayor, L., Meisser, M., Philippsen, R., Piguet, R., Ramel, G., Terrien, G. and Tomatis, N., 2003, Robox at Expo.02: A Large Scale Installation of Personal Robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 42, pp. 203--222.
[19]
Sisbot, E. A., Marin-Urias, L. F., Alami, R. and Simeon, T., 2007, A human aware mobile robot motion planner, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 23, pp. 874--883.
[20]
Thrun, S., Burgard, W. and Fox, D., 2005, Probabilistic Robotics (Intelligent Robotics and Autonomous Agents), The MIT Press.
[21]
Topp, E. A. and Christensen, H. I., 2006, Topological Modelling for Human Augmented Mapping, IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS2006), pp. 2257--2263.
[22]
Torta, E., Cuijpers, R. H., Juola, J. F. and Van Der Pol, D., 2012, Modeling and testing proxemic behavior for humanoid robots, International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, vol. 9,
[23]
Trautman, P. and Krause, A., 2010, Unfreezing the Robot: Navigation in Dense, Interacting Crowds, IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS2010), pp. 797--803.
[24]
Walters, M. L., Dautenhahn, K., Boekhorst, R. t., Koay, K. L., Kaouri, C., Woods, S., Nehaniv, C., Lee, D. and Werry, I., 2005, The influence of subjects' personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment, IEEE Int. Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN2005), pp. 347--352.
[25]
Weiss, A., Igelsböck, J., Tscheligi, M., Bauer, A., Kühnlenz, K., Wollherr, D. and Buss, M., 2010, Robots Asking for Directions: The Willingness of Passers-by to Support Robots, ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI2010), pp. 23--30.
[26]
Yamaoka, F., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H. and Hagita, N., 2009, Developing a Model of Robot Behavior to Identify and Appropriately Respond to Implicit Attention-Shifting, ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI2009), pp. 133--140.
[27]
Yeap, W. K., 1988, Towards a computational theory of cognitive maps, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, pp. 297--360.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Investigation of Low-Moral Actions by Malicious Anonymous Operators of Avatar RobotsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/369646614:1(1-34)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2024
  • (2021)Communication Strategy for Efficient Guidance Providing : Domain-structure Awareness, Performance Trade-offs, and Value of Future Observations2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561880(3133-3139)Online publication date: 30-May-2021
  • (2020)Understanding a public environment via continuous robot observationsRobotics and Autonomous Systems10.1016/j.robot.2020.103443(103443)Online publication date: Jan-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
HRI '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction
March 2014
538 pages
ISBN:9781450326582
DOI:10.1145/2559636
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 03 March 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. concept of territory
  2. human-robot interaction
  3. social robots

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

HRI'14
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

HRI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 32 of 132 submissions, 24%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 268 of 1,124 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Investigation of Low-Moral Actions by Malicious Anonymous Operators of Avatar RobotsACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction10.1145/369646614:1(1-34)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2024
  • (2021)Communication Strategy for Efficient Guidance Providing : Domain-structure Awareness, Performance Trade-offs, and Value of Future Observations2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)10.1109/ICRA48506.2021.9561880(3133-3139)Online publication date: 30-May-2021
  • (2020)Understanding a public environment via continuous robot observationsRobotics and Autonomous Systems10.1016/j.robot.2020.103443(103443)Online publication date: Jan-2020
  • (2018)Computational Human-Robot InteractionFoundations and Trends in Robotics10.1561/23000000494:2-3(105-223)Online publication date: 13-Dec-2018
  • (2017)Enabling Harmonized Human-Robot Interaction in a Public SpaceHuman-Harmonized Information Technology, Volume 210.1007/978-4-431-56535-2_4(115-137)Online publication date: 21-Apr-2017

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media