skip to main content
10.1145/2559636.2563713acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Human embodiment creates problems for robot learning by demonstration using a control panel

Published:03 March 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, problems in instructing an industrial robot by means of a control panel are investigated. In order for the robot to learn as much and as fast as possible from demonstration, the demonstration by the teacher needs to be as precise as possible. Usability studies constitute a useful methodology to investigate in which situations users provide the robot with exact trajectories and, if not, why they face difficulties. Results show that movements involving only the lowest joint of the robot arm are straight-forward and very exact. In contrast, fine movements that involve joints of the upper arm cause considerable problems. The analysis shows that users have to employ separate actions instead of focusing on the target and therefore need to consciously plan the action since they cannot match the robot's movements with those of their own embodiment.

References

  1. Collins, K., Palmer, A. J. & K. Rathmill (1984). The development of a European benchmark for the comparison of assembly robot programming systems. In 1st Robot. Euro. Conf., Brussels.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Fischer et al. (in prep.) Comparing different control modes for robot learning from demonstration.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Goodwin, K. (2009). Understanding Potential Users and Customers. In: Designing for the digital age: How to create human-centered products and services. Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Savarimuthu, T. R., Liljekrans, D., Ellekilde, L.-P., Ude, A., Nemez, B. & Krueger, N. (2013). Analysis of human Peg-in-Hole Executions in a Robotic Embodiment using uncertain Grasps. In 9th International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control, RoMoCo.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. User Manual 1.6 (2012), Robot UR10 with CB2 Euromap 67, Universal Robots, Odense, Denmark.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Human embodiment creates problems for robot learning by demonstration using a control panel

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '14: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction
      March 2014
      538 pages
      ISBN:9781450326582
      DOI:10.1145/2559636

      Copyright © 2014 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 March 2014

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      HRI '14 Paper Acceptance Rate32of132submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader