skip to main content
10.1145/2565585.2565598acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshotmobileConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The mote is dead: long live the discarded smartphone!

Published:26 February 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

As the rapid pace of smartphone improvements drives consumer appetites for the latest and greatest devices, the hidden cost is millions of tons of e-waste containing hazardous chemicals that are difficult to dispose of safely. Studies show that smartphone users are replacing their devices every 18 months, almost three times faster than desktop computers [1, 3], producing millions of discarded smartphones each year that end up lying in desk drawers, buried in landfills, or shipped to third-world countries where they are burned to extract precious metals, a process that damages both the health of those involved and the environment.

Fortunately, the capabilities of discarded smartphones make them ideal for reuse. Instead of ending up in a landfill, a discarded smartphone could be integrated into a home security system or transformed into a health care device for the elderly. In this paper, we evaluate using discarded smartphones to replace traditional sensor network "motes". Compared with motes, discarded devices have many advantages: price, performance, connectivity, interfaces, and ease of programming. While the main question is whether their energy consumption is low enough to enable harvesting solutions to allow continuous operation, we present preliminary results indicating that this may be possible.

References

  1. bit-tech. Most computers replaced after 4.5 years. http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2011/05/12/most-computers-replaced-after-4-5-years/1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Digikey. Comparing Low-Power Wireless Technologies. http://www.digikey.com/us/en/techzone/wireless/resources/articles/comparing-low-power-wireless.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Digital Technology: The Tech Portal. Trends in Smartphone Turnover. http://www.technology-digital.com/gadgets/-by-tim-kridel.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrenetxea, G., Ingelrest, F., Schaefer, G., and Vetterli, M. The hitchhiker's guide to successful wireless sensor network deployments. In Proc. ACM SenSys (2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Coalition, E. T. Responsible Recycling vs Global Dumping. http://www.electronicstakeback.com/global-e-waste-dumping/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunkels, A., Gronvall, B., and Voigt, T. Contiki: A Lightweight and Flexible Operating System for Tiny Networked Sensors. In Proc. First IEEE Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors (EmNetS) (Tampa, FL, November 2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Goldman, D. Your dead iPhone is a gold mine---literally. http://money.cnn.com/2011/10/13/technology/iphone_trade_in/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hill, J., Szewczyk, R., Woo, A., Hollar, S., Culler, D. E., and Pister, K. S. J. System architecture directions for networked sensors. In Proc. the 9th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (Boston, MA, USA, Nov. 2000), pp. 93--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Klues, K., Handziski, V., Lu, C., Wolisz, A., Culler, D., Gay, D., and Levis, P. Integrating concurrency control and energy management in device drivers. In Proc. the 12st Annual SOSP (2007), ACM, pp. 251--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kuo, Y.-S., Verma, S., Schmid, T., and Dutta, P. Hijacking power and bandwidth from the mobile phone's audio interface. In Proceedings of the First ACM Symposium on Computing for Development (New York, NY, USA, 2010), ACM DEV '10, ACM, pp. 24:1--24:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Pakzad, S. N., Kim, S., Fenves, G. L., Glaser, S. D., Culler, D. E., and Demmel, J. W. Multi-purpose wireless accelerometers for civil infrastructure monitoring. In Proc. 5th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring (IWSHM 2005) (Stanford, CA, September 2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sprint. Sprint Electronics Stewardship Policy. http://www.sprint.com/responsibility/ouroperations/docs/ElectronicsStewardshipPolicy.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sprint. Sprint M2M Solutions. http://m2m.sprint.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Szewczyk, R., Mainwaring, A., Polastre, J., and Culler, D. An analysis of a large scale habitat monitoring application. In Proc. ACM SenSys (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. United States Deparatment of Transportation. Number of U.S. Aircraft, Vehicles, Vessels, and Other Conveyances. http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_01_11.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Statistics on the Management of Used and End-of-Life Electronics. http://www.epa.gov/osw/conserve/materials/ecycling/manage.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. greenbiz.com. Newsweek's 2012 Green Rankings. http://www.greenbiz.com/blog/2012/10/20/newsweeks-2012-green-rankings-time-its-serious.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. www.raspberrypi.org. RasPi power usage measurements. http://www.raspberrypi.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=63&t=6050&start=50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Werner-Allen, G., Dawson-Haggerty, S., and Welsh, M. Lance: Optimizing high-resolution signal collection in wireless sensor networks. In Proc. ACM SenSys (Raleigh, NC, USA, 2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Werner-Allen, G., Lorincz, K., Johnson, J., Lees, J., and Welsh, M. Fidelity and yield in a volcano monitoring sensor network. In Proc. USENIX OSDI (Seattle, WA, 2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Yerva, L., Campbell, B., Bansal, A., Schmid, T., and Dutta, P. Grafting energy-harvesting leaves onto the sensornet tree. In Proc. ACM IPSN (New York, NY, USA, 2012), ACM, pp. 197--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The mote is dead: long live the discarded smartphone!

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            HotMobile '14: Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications
            February 2014
            134 pages
            ISBN:9781450327428
            DOI:10.1145/2565585

            Copyright © 2014 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 26 February 2014

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            HotMobile '14 Paper Acceptance Rate22of72submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate96of345submissions,28%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader