skip to main content
10.1145/2568088.2576797acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicpeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Model-driven engineering in practice: integrated performance decision support for process-centric business impact analysis

Published: 22 March 2014 Publication History

Abstract

Modern businesses and business processes depend on an increasingly interconnected set of resources, which can be affected by external and internal factors at any time. Threats like natural disasters, terrorism, or even power blackouts potentially cause disruptions in an organisation's resource infrastructure which in turn negatively impacts the performance of dependent business processes. In order to assist business analysts dealing with this ever increasing complexity of interdependent business structures a model-driven workbench named Model-Driven Business Impact Analysis (MDBIA) has been developed with the purpose of predicting consequences on the business process level for an organisation in case of disruptions. An already existing Model-Driven Performance Engineering (MDPE) workbench, which originally provided process-centric performance decision support, has been adapted and extended to meet the additional requirements of business impact analysis. The fundamental concepts of the resulting MDBIA workbench, which include the introduction of the applied key models and transformation chain, are presented and evaluated in this paper.

References

[1]
Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service: The Economic Effects of 9/11: A Retrospective Assessment. http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL31617.pdf (2002)
[2]
van der Aalst, W., ter Hofstede, A., Weske, M.: Business Process Management, International Conference, BPM 2003, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, June 26--27, 2003, Proceedings, volume 2678 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer (2003)
[3]
Fritzsche, M., Picht, M., Gilani, W., Spence, I., Brown, J., Kilpatrick, P.: Extending BPM Environments of Your Choice with Performance Related Decision Support. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Business Process Management, pp. 97--112. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (2009)
[4]
Harris, S.:CISSP All-in-One Exam Guide, Fifth Edition. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY, USA (2010)
[5]
Janchivlamdan, R. Buchanan, T., Tierney, T., Davis, J.: Business Continuity Planning and Development. https://ectd.du.edu/source/uploads/11142668.pdf (2007)
[6]
British Standards Institute. BS25999, Code of Practice for Business Continuity Management. BSI (2006)
[7]
Smith, D.: Business Continuity Management: Good Practice Guidelines, pp. 0--18. BSI (2002)
[8]
Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G.: The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California (2003)
[9]
Fritzsche, M.: PhD Thesis: Performance related Decision Support for Process Modelling. School of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Queens University Belfast (2010)
[10]
Rozinat, A., Wynn, M., van der Aalst, W., Hofstede, A., Fidge, C.: Workflow Simulation for Operational Decision Support Using Design, Historic and State Information. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM'08). Springer-Verlag (2008)
[11]
Grassi, V., Mirandola, R., Sabetta, A.: From design to analysis models: a kernel language for performance and reliability analysis of component-based systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on Software and performance, pp. 25--36. ACM, New York (2005)
[12]
Petriu, D., Woodside, M.:An intermediate metamodel with scenarios and resources for generating performance models from UML designs. In: Software and Systems Modeling, Volume 6, Issue - 2, pp. 163--184 (2007)
[13]
Stranack, T., Cornish, C.: Business Continuity Management - Bridging the divide. In: Business, vol. 6, pp. 1--4 (2009)
[14]
Object Management Group. Business Process Modeling Notation Specification, Final Adopted Specification, Version 1.0. http://www.bpmn.org/Documents/BPMN\_1-0.pdf (2006)
[15]
Object Management Group Inc: Unified Modeling Language 2.0: Superstructure. http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.0/Superstructure/PDF. formal/05-07-04, 2005
[16]
Snabe, J., Rosenber, A., Molle, C., Scavillo, M.: Business Process Management: The SAP Roadmap (2008)
[17]
Metasonic AG. jPASS! - Subjektorientierte Prozessmodellierung. http://www.metasonic.de/ (2009)
[18]
XJ Technologies. AnyLogic -- multi-paradigm simulation software. http://www.xjtek.com/anylogic/ (2010)
[19]
Porzucek, T., Kluth, S., Copaciu, F., Zorn, W.: Modeling and Evaluation Framework for FMC-QE. In: Proceedings of the 2009 16th Annual IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer Based Systems, pp. 237--243. IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC, USA (2009)
[20]
IBM. Rational Software Architect.http://www-01.ibm.com/software/awdtools/swarchitect/ (2011)
[21]
Microsoft, Office Visio, http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/visio/ (2007)
[22]
Jensen, K., Kristensen, L. M.: Coloured Petri Nets - Modelling and Validation of Concurrent Systems, Springer (2009)
[23]
Eclipse Foundation: The Eclipse Foundation. http://www.eclipse.org/org/ (2013)
[24]
Budinsky, F., Brodsky S. A., Merks, E.: Eclipse Modeling Framework. Pearson Education (2003)
[25]
Jouault, F., Allilaire, F., Bézivin, J., Kurtev, I.: ATL: A model transformation tool. In journal Science of Computer Programming, vol. 72, pp. 31--39, Elsevier North-Holland (2008)
[26]
Allilaire, Bézivin, J., F., Jouault, F., Kurtev, I.: ATL: Eclipse Support for Model Transformation. In: Proc. of the Eclipse Technology eXchange Workshop (eTX) at ECOOP, (2006)

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICPE '14: Proceedings of the 5th ACM/SPEC international conference on Performance engineering
March 2014
310 pages
ISBN:9781450327336
DOI:10.1145/2568088
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 March 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. business impact analysis
  2. business process management
  3. model-driven engineering
  4. model-driven performance engineering

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ICPE'14
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

ICPE '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 21 of 78 submissions, 27%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 252 of 851 submissions, 30%

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 181
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media