research-article

Context-oriented software engineering: a modularity vision

Authors:

Tomoyuki Aotani,

Hidehiko Masuhara,

Tetsuo TamaiAuthors Info & Claims

MODULARITY '14: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Modularity

Pages 85 - 98

https://doi.org/10.1145/2577080.2579816

Published: 22 April 2014 Publication History

Abstract

There are a number of constructs to implement context-dependent behavior, such as conditional branches using if statements, method dispatching in object-oriented programming (such as the state design pattern), dynamic deployment of aspects in aspect-oriented programming, and layers in context-oriented programming (COP). Uses of those constructs significantly affect the modularity of the obtained implementation. While there are a number of cases where COP improves modularity, it is not clear when we should use COP in general.

This paper presents a preliminary study on our software development methodology, the context-oriented software engineering (COSE), which is a use-case-driven software development methodology that guides us to a specification of context-dependent requirements and design. We provide a way to map the requirements and design formed by COSE to the implementation in our COP language ServalCJ. We applied COSE to two applications in order to assess its feasibility. We also identify key linguistic constructs that make COSE effective by examining existing COP languages. These feasibility studies and examination raise a number of interesting open issues. We finally show our future research roadmap to address those issues.

References

[1]

Gregory D. Abowd, Christopher G. Atkeson, Jason Hong, Sue Long, Rob Kooper, and Mike Pinkerton. Cyberguide: A mobile context-aware tour guide. Wireless Networks, 3(5):421--433, 1997.

Digital Library

[2]

Karim Ali and Ondrej Lhoták. Whole-program analysis without the whole program. In ECOOP'13, volume 7920 of LNCS, pages 378--400, 2013.

Digital Library

[3]

Raian Ali, Fabiano Dalpiaz, and Paolo Giorgini. Goal-based self-contextualization. In CAiSE 2009, pages 37--43, 2009.

[4]

Sven Apel and Christian Kästner. On overview of feature-oriented software development. Journal of Object Technology, 8(5):49--84, 2009.

[5]

Sven Apel, Thomas Leich, Marko Rosenmüller, and Gunter Saake. FeatureC: On the symbiosis of feature-oriented and aspect-oriented programming. In GPCE'05, pages 125--140, 2005.

Digital Library

[6]

Malte Appeltauer, Robert Hirschfeld, Michael Haupt, Jens Lincke, and Michael Perscheid. A comparison of context-oriented programming languages. In COP'09, pages 1--6, 2009.

Digital Library

[7]

Malte Appeltauer, Robert Hirschfeld, Michael Haupt, and Hidehiko Masuhara. ContextJ: Context-oriented programming with Java. Computer Software, 28(1):272--292, 2011.

[8]

Malte Appeltauer, Robert Hirschfeld, and Hidehiko Masuhara. Improving the development of context-dependent Java application with ContextJ. In COP'09, 2009.

Digital Library

[9]

Malte Appeltauer, Robert Hirschfeld, Hidehiko Masuhara, Michael Haupt, and Kazunori Kawauchi. Event-specific software composition in context-oriented programming. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Composition 2010 (SC'10), volume 6144 of LNCS, pages 50--65, 2010.

Digital Library

[10]

Ivia Aracic, Vaidas Gasiunas, Mira Mezini, and Klaus Ostermann. An overview of CaesarJ. In Transactions on Aspect-Oriented Software Development I, volume 3880 of LNCS, pages 135--173, 2006.

Digital Library

[11]

G. Bracha and W. Cook. Mixin-based inheritance. In OOPSLA 1990, pages 303--311, 1990.

Digital Library

[12]

Cinzia Cappiello, Marco Comuzzi, Enrico Mussi, and Barbara Pernici. Context-management for adaptive information systems. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 146:69--84, 2006.

Digital Library

[13]

Stefano Ceri, Florian Daniel, Federico M. Facca, and Maristella Matera. Model-driven engineering of active contet-awareness. World Wide Web, 10:387--413, 2007.

Digital Library

[14]

Pascal Costanza and Robert Hirschfeld. Language constructs for context-oriented programming -- an overview of ContextL. In Dynamic Language Symposium (DLS) '05, pages 1--10, 2005.

Digital Library

[15]

Anne Dardenne, Axel van Lamsweerde, and Stephen Fickas. Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Science of Computer Programming, 20:3--50, 1993.

Digital Library

[16]

Conal Elliott and Paul Hudak. Functional reactive animation. In ICFP'97, pages 263--273, 1997.

Digital Library

[17]

Carlo Ghezzi, Matteo Praella, and Guido Salvaneschi. Programming language support to context-aware adaptation--a case-study with Erlang. In SEAMS'10, pages 59--68, 2010.

Digital Library

[18]

Karen Henrichsen and Jadwiga Indulska. A software engineering framework for context-aware pervasive computing. In PERCOM'04, 2004.

Digital Library

[19]

Robert Hirschfeld, Pascal Costanza, and Michael Haupt. An introduction to context-oriented programming with ContextS. In GTTSE 2007, volume 5235 of LNCS, pages 396--407, 2008.

Digital Library

[20]

Robert Hirschfeld, Pascal Costanza, and Oscar Nierstrasz. Context-oriented programming. Journal of Object Technology, 7(3):125--151, 2008.

[21]

Ivar Jacobson, Magnus Christerson, Patrik Jonsson, and Gunnar Övergaard. Object-Oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case Driven Approach. Pearson Education, 1992.

[22]

Ivar Jacobson and Pan-Wei Ng. Aspect-Oriented Software Development with Use Cases. Pearson Education, 2005.

Digital Library

[23]

Tetsuo Kamina, Tomoyuki Aotani, and Hidehiko Masuhara. EventCJ: a context-oriented programming language with declarative event-based context transition. In AOSD '11, pages 253--264, 2011.

Digital Library

[24]

Tetsuo Kamina, Tomoyuki Aotani, and Hidehiko Masuhara. Introducing composite layers in EventCJ. IPSJ Transactions on Programming, 6(1):1--8, 2013.

[25]

Tetsuo Kamina, Tomoyuki Aotani, and Hidehiko Masuhara. Mapping context-dependent requirements to event-based context-oriented programs for modularity. In Workshop on Reactivity, Events and Modularity (REM 2013), 2013.

[26]

Tetsuo Kamina, Tomoyuki Aotani, and Hidehiko Masuhara. A unified context activation mechanism. In COP'13, 2013.

Digital Library

[27]

Kyo C. Kang, Sholom G. Cohen, James A. Hess, William E. Novak, and A. Spencer Peterson. Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study. Technical Report Carnegie Mellon University/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1990.

[28]

Roger Keays and Andry Rakotonirainy. Context-oriented programming. In MobiDE'03, pages 9--16, 2003.

Digital Library

[29]

Gregor Kiczales, Erik Hilsdale, Jim Hugunin, Mik Kersten, Jeffrey Palm, and William G. Grisword. An overview of AspectJ. In ECOOP'01, pages 327--353, 2001.

Digital Library

[30]

Christian Koppen and Maximilian Störzer. PCDiff: Attacking the fragile pointcut problem. In European Interactive Workshop on Aspects in Software, 2004.

[31]

Alexiei Lapouchnian and John Mylopoulous. Modeling domain variability in requirements engineering with contexts. In ER 2009, volume 5829 of LNCS, pages 115--130, 2009.

Digital Library

[32]

Sotirious Liaskos, Alexei Lapouchnian, Yijun Yu, Eric Yu, and John Mylopoulos. On goal-based variability acquisition and analysis. In RE'06, pages 79--88, 2006.

Digital Library

[33]

Lin Liu and Eric Yu. Designing information systems in social context: a goal and scenario modelling approach. Information Systems, 29(2):187--203, 2004.

Digital Library

[34]

Christian Prehofer. Feature-oriented programming: A fresh look at objects. In ECOOP'97, volume 1241 of LNCS, pages 419--443, 1997.

[35]

Awais Rashid, Peter Sawyer, Ana Moreira, and Joao Araujo. Early aspects: a model for aspect-oriented requirements engineering. In RE'02, pages 199--202, 2002.

Digital Library

[36]

Daniel Saliber, Anind K. Dey, and Gregory D. Abowd. The context toolkit: Aiding the development of context-enabled applications. In CHI'99, pages 434--441, 1999.

Digital Library

[37]

Mohammed Salifu, Bashar Nuseibeh, Lucia Rapanotti, and Thein Than Tun. Using problem descriptions to represent variability for context-aware applications. In VaMoS 2007, 2007.

[38]

Mohammed Salifu, Yujun Yu, and Bashar Nuseibeh. Specifying monitoring and switching problems in context. In RE'07, pages 211--220, 2007.

[39]

Guido Salvaneschi, Carlo Ghezzi, and Matteo Pradella. ContextErlang: Introducing context-oriented programming in the actor model. In AOSD'12, 2012.

Digital Library

[40]

Nathanael Schärli, Stéphane Ducasse, Oscar Nierstrasz, and Andrew P. Black. Traits: Composable units of behaviour. In ECOOP 2003, volume 2743 of LNCS, pages 248--274, 2003.

[41]

Alistair Sutcliffe, Stephen Fickas, and McKay Moore Sohlberg. PC-RE: a method for personal and contextual requirements engineering with some experience. Requirements Engineering, 11(3):157--173, 2006.

Digital Library

[42]

Fuminobu Takeyama and Shigeru Chiba. Implementing feature interactions with generic feature modules. In Software Composition 2013, volume 8088 of LNCS, pages 81--96, 2013.

Cited By

Caesar BValdezate ALadiges JCapilla RFay A(2024)A Process for Identifying and Modeling Relevant System Context for the Reconfiguration of Automated SystemsIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering10.1109/TASE.2023.329139421:3(3977-4002)Online publication date: Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2023.3291394
Liu ZTanigawa IWatanabe HHisazumi K(2020)PLAMProceedings of the 12th ACM International Workshop on Context-Oriented Programming and Advanced Modularity10.1145/3422584.3422766(1-8)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3422584.3422766
Capilla RBosch JHinchey M(2018)Cutting‐Edge Topics on Dynamic Software VariabilitySoftware Technology: 10 Years of Innovation in IEEE Computer10.1002/9781119174240.ch14(247-270)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2018
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119174240.ch14
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Context-oriented software engineering: a modularity vision
1. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Software development process management
      1. Software development methods

Recommendations

Context-oriented programming: A software engineering perspective

The implementation of context-aware systems can be supported through the adoption of techniques at the architectural level such as middlewares or component-oriented architectures. It can also be supported by suitable constructs at the programming ...
A framework for analyzing context-oriented programming languages
Abstract
Context-aware systems keep on emerging as an intrinsic part of everyday activities. To cope with such situations, programming languages are extended to support the notion of context. Although context-oriented programming languages exist for over ...
Highlights
- Conceptualizing context-oriented development.
- A framework for analyzing context-oriented programming languages.
- Analysis of three context-oriented programming languages: Subjective-C, ServalCJ, COBPjs.
- Findings: Context-...
Dynamic visualisation of features and contexts for context-oriented programmers
EICS '19: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems

Context-oriented programming languages allow programmers to develop context-aware systems that can adapt their behaviour dynamically upon changing contexts. Due to the highly dynamic nature of such systems and the many possible combinations of contexts ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

MODULARITY '14: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Modularity

April 2014

264 pages

ISBN:9781450327725

DOI:10.1145/2577080

Conference Chair:
Achille Peternier
University of Lugano, Switzerland
,
General Chair:
Walter Binder
University of Lugano, Switzerland
,
Program Chairs:
Erik Ernst
Aarhus University, Denmark
,
Robert Hirschfeld
Hasso-Plattner-Institut Potsdam, Germany

Copyright © 2014 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

AOSA: Aspect-Oriented Software Association

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 April 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

MODULARITY '14

Sponsor:

AOSA

MODULARITY '14: 13th International Conference on Modularity

April 22 - 26, 2014

Lugano, Switzerland

Acceptance Rates

MODULARITY '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 21 of 60 submissions, 35%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 41 of 139 submissions, 29%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

15
Total Citations
View Citations
296
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)7
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Caesar BValdezate ALadiges JCapilla RFay A(2024)A Process for Identifying and Modeling Relevant System Context for the Reconfiguration of Automated SystemsIEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering10.1109/TASE.2023.329139421:3(3977-4002)Online publication date: Jul-2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2023.3291394
Liu ZTanigawa IWatanabe HHisazumi K(2020)PLAMProceedings of the 12th ACM International Workshop on Context-Oriented Programming and Advanced Modularity10.1145/3422584.3422766(1-8)Online publication date: 21-Jul-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3422584.3422766
Capilla RBosch JHinchey M(2018)Cutting‐Edge Topics on Dynamic Software VariabilitySoftware Technology: 10 Years of Innovation in IEEE Computer10.1002/9781119174240.ch14(247-270)Online publication date: 3-Sep-2018
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119174240.ch14
Tamai TMei H(2016)Product-centered view vs process-centered viewProceedings of the 20th International Systems and Software Product Line Conference10.1145/2934466.2971318(18-21)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2934466.2971318
Raab MFuentes LBatory DCzarnecki K(2016)Improving system integration using a modular configuration specification languageCompanion Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Modularity10.1145/2892664.2892691(152-157)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2892664.2892691
Watanabe HTanigawa ISugaya MOgura NHisazumi KFuentes LBatory DCzarnecki K(2016)A layer-structure diagram and a layer-interaction diagram towards a context-oriented development methodology for embedded systemsCompanion Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Modularity10.1145/2892664.2892685(125-130)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2892664.2892685
Mens KCapilla RCardozo NDumas BFuentes LBatory DCzarnecki K(2016)A taxonomy of context-aware software variability approachesCompanion Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Modularity10.1145/2892664.2892684(119-124)Online publication date: 14-Mar-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2892664.2892684
Degano PFerrari GGalletta L(2016)A Two-Component Language for AdaptationIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2015.249694142:6(505-529)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TSE.2015.2496941
Capilla RValdezate ADiaz F(2016)A Runtime Variability Mechanism Based on Supertypes2016 IEEE 1st International Workshops on Foundations and Applications of Self* Systems (FAS*W)10.1109/FAS-W.2016.16(6-11)Online publication date: Sep-2016
https://doi.org/10.1109/FAS-W.2016.16
Kamina TAotani TMasuhara HTamai T(2016)Context-Oriented Software Development with Generalized Layer Activation MechanismTransactions on Modularity and Composition I10.1007/978-3-319-46969-0_1(3-40)Online publication date: 30-Sep-2016
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46969-0_1
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten