skip to main content
10.1145/2582112.2582117acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessocgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
tutorial

Improved bounds for the conflict-free chromatic art gallery problem

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In chromatic variants of the art gallery problem, simple polygons are guarded with point guards that are assigned one of k colors each. We say these guards cover the polygon. Here we consider the conflict-free chromatic art gallery problem, first studied by Bärtschi and Suri (Algorithmica 2013): A covering of the polygon is conflict-free if each point of the polygon is seen by some guard whose color appears exactly once among the guards visible to that point. We are interested in the smallest number k(n) of colors that ensure such a covering for every n-vertex polygon.

It is known that k(n) is O(log n) for orthogonal and for monotone polygons, and O(log2 n) for arbitrary simple polygons. Our main contribution in this paper is an improvement of the upper bound on k(n) to O(log n) for simple polygons.

The bound is achieved through a partitioning of the polygon into weak visibility subpolygons, which is known as a window partition. In a weak visibility polygon, there is a boundary edge e such that each point of the polygon is seen by some point on e. We show for the first time for this special class of polygons an upper bound of O(log n). For the subpolygons of the window partition we prove a novel concept of independence that allows to reuse colors in independent subpolygons. Combining these results leads to the upper bound of O(log n) for arbitrary simple polygons.

References

  1. D. Avis and G. T. Toussaint. An optimal algorithm for determining the visibility of a polygon from an edge. IEEE Trans. Comput., C-30(12):910--914, Dec 1981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Bärtschi and S. Suri. Conflict-free chromatic art gallery coverage. Algorithmica, 68(1):265--283, Jan 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. P. Bose, A. Lubiw, and J. I. Munro. Efficient visibility queries in simple polygons. Computational Geometry, 23(3):313--335, Nov 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. P. Cheilaris. Conflict-free coloring. PhD thesis, The City University of New York, Graduate Faculty in Computer Science, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P. Cheilaris, L. Gargano, A. A. Rescigno, and S. Smorodinsky. Strong conflict-free coloring for intervals. In K.-M. Chao, T.-s. Hsu, and D.-T. Lee, editors, Algorithms and Computation, volume 7676 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 4--13. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. P. Cheilaris and S. Smorodinsky. Conflict-free coloring with respect to a subset of intervals. CoRR, Apr 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. K. Chen, A. Fiat, H. Kaplan, M. Levy, J. Matoušek, E. Mossel, J. Pach, M. Sharir, S. Smorodinsky, U. Wagner, and E. Welzl. Online conflict-free coloring for intervals. SIAM Journal on Computing, 36(5):1342--1359, Dec 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S.-H. Choi, S. Y. Shin, and K.-Y. Chwa. Characterizing and recognizing the visibility graph of a funnel-shaped polygon. Algorithmica, 14(1):27--51, Jul 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. V. Chvátal. A combinatorial theorem in plane geometry. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 18(1):39--41, Feb 1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. P. Colley, A. Lubiw, and J. Spinrad. Visibility graphs of towers. Computational Geometry, 7(3):161--172, Feb 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. L. Erickson and S. LaValle. An art gallery approach to ensuring that landmarks are distinguishable. Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, VII:81--88, Jun 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. G. Even, Z. Lotker, D. Ron, and S. Smorodinsky. Conflict-free colorings of simple geometric regions with applications to frequency assignment in cellular networks. SIAM J. Comput., 33(1):94--136, Nov 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. K. Ghosh. Visibility Algorithms in the Plane. Cambridge University Press, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. E. Goodman and J. O'Rourke, editors. Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry, chapter 33.4, 47.1, pages 624, 864. CRC Press, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. J. Katz, N. Lev-Tov, and G. Morgenstern. Conflict-free coloring of points on a line with respect to a set of intervals. Computational Geometry, 45(9):508--514, Nov 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. O'Rourke. Art Gallery Theorems and Algorithms. Oxford University Press, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Pach and G. Tardos. Conflict-free colourings of graphs and hypergraphs. Combinatorics, Probability and Computing, 18(05):819--834, Sep 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. Pach and G. Tardos. Coloring axis-parallel rectangles. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, 117(6):776--782, Aug 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. T. C. Shermer. Recent results in art galleries (geometry). Proceedings of the IEEE, 80(9):1384--1399, Sep 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. S. Smorodinsky. Combinatorial Problems in Computational Geometry. PhD thesis, Tel-Aviv University, School of Computer Science, Jun 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. S. Smorodinsky. On the chromatic number of geometric hypergraphs. SIAM J. Discrete Math., 21(3):676--687, Sep 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. S. Smorodinsky. Conflict-Free Coloring and its Applications. In I. Barany, K. Boroczky, G. Toth, and J. Pach, editors, Geometry---Intuitive, Discrete, and Convex, volume 24 of Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies. Springer, Berlin, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. S. Suri. A linear time algorithm for minimum link paths inside a simple polygon. Comput. Vision Graph., 35(1):99--110, Jul 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. S. Suri. On some link distance problems in a simple polygon. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 6(1):108--113, Feb 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. J. Urrutia. Art gallery and illumination problems. In J. Sack and J. Urrutia, editors, Handbook on Computational Geometry, pages 973--1026. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. F. A. Valentine. Minimal sets of visibility. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 4(6):917--921, Dec 1953.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Improved bounds for the conflict-free chromatic art gallery problem

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        SOCG'14: Proceedings of the thirtieth annual symposium on Computational geometry
        June 2014
        588 pages
        ISBN:9781450325943
        DOI:10.1145/2582112

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 June 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • tutorial
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        SOCG'14 Paper Acceptance Rate60of175submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate625of1,685submissions,37%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader