Anthony J. Hornof
- 1.Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules oJ the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- 2.Bovair, S., Kieras, D. E., & Poison, P. G. (1990). The acquisition and performance of text editing skill: A cognitive complexity analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 1-48.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.Card, S. K. (1984). Visual search of computer command menus. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X." Control of Language Processes, (pp. 97-108). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
- 4.Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (i 983). The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.John, B. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1994). The GOMS family of analysis techniques: Tools for design and evaluation (Technical Report No. CMU-CS-94-181): Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (1995). An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction (EPIC Tech. Rep. No. 5, TR-95/ONR-EPIC-5). Ann Arbor, Michigan: Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.Google Scholar
- 7.Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (in press). An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Human-Computer interaction. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.Laird, J., Rosenbloom, P., & Newell, A. (1986). Universal subgoaling and chunking. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9.Lee, E., & MacGregor, J. (1985). Minimizing user search time in menu retrieval systems. Human Factors, 27(2), 157-162.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 10.Lohse, J. (1991). A cognitive model for the perception and understanding of graphs. In Proceedings of CHI '91, New Orleans, Louisiana. New York: ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.Nilsen, E. L. (1991). Perceptual-motor control in human-computer interaction (Tech. Rep. No. 37). Ann Arbor, Michigan: The Cognitive Science and Machine Intelligence Laboratory, The University of Michigan.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Norman, K. L. (1991). The Psychology of Menu Selection: Designing Cognitive Control of the Human/Computer Interface. Norwood, N. J.: Ablex. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.Sears, A. (1993). Layout appropriateness: A metric for evaluating user interface widget layout. 1EEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 19(7). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14.Vandierendonek, A., Van Hoe, R., & De Soete, G. (1988). Menu search as a function of menu organization, categorization and experience. Acta Psychologica, 69(3), 231-248.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Cognitive modeling reveals menu search in both random and systematic
Recommendations
The low-level cognitive processes involved in the visual search of pull-down menus and computer screens, as revealed by cognitive modeling
CHI '98: CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing SystemsEye tracking the visual search of click-down menus
CHI '99: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsClick-down (or pull-down) menus have long been a key component of graphical user interfaces, yet we know surprisingly little about how users actually interact with such menus. Nilsens [8] study on menu selection has led to the development of a number of ...
Modeling icon search in ACT-R/PM
As the use of graphical user interfaces expands into new areas, icons are becoming an increasingly important aspect of GUIs. Oddly, little research has been done into the costs and benefits associated with using icons. One aspect of icons, icon borders, ...
Comments