skip to main content
10.1145/2591888.2591945acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Benefits of introducing the cloud computing based m-government in the western cape: policy implications

Published:22 October 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Successful delivery of services and information to the public nowadays largely depends on the use of modern information and communication technologies (ICT), which are transforming governments to be more accessible, efficient, effective and accountable. The pertinent literature suggests that cloud computing (CC) and technology-enabled mobile government (m-government) combined seem to be the most plausible in this regard. Hence, the plans of the Western Cape Government (WCG) in South Africa to introduce cloud computing based m-government services on the assumptions that (i) penetration of the mobile phones is almost 100% in this province and (ii) cloud computing can reduce service delivery costs and make government services more accessible and effective. Although recent studies have found that citizens and government officials in the Western Cape perceive m-government services supplied via cloud computing beneficial, and thus likely to be used, deriving benefits from the introduction of the CC based m-government largely still depend on a number of other factors. We have explored the impact of these factors on policy-making using two ICT benefit conceptual models: one found in the Information Management Body of Knowledge (IMBOK) and the Access-Adoption-Appropriation (AAA) model. Based on our literature review we tested our conceptual findings with two focus groups consisting of WCG officials and citizens. We found that these models, if used appropriately, can guide policy-making in this area, by leading government officials toward more effective and efficient service delivery and allow for the citizens' beneficial use of CC based m-government services. We have also acknowledged some limitation of this study as well as some recommendations for the further research.

References

  1. Farelo, M., & Morris, C. 2006 The status of EGovernment in South Africa. STAfrica Conference, Pretoria, South Africa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Maranny, E. A. 2011 Stage Maturity Model of m-Government (SMM m-Gov): Improving e-Government performance by utilizing m-Government features. Master Thesis, Business Information Technology, University of Twente, School of Management and Governance, 29th June, 2011. Unpablished. Available at http://essay.utwente.nl/62691/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Firestone, C. M. 2008 Civic Engagement on the Move: How mobile media can serve the public good. TheAspen Institute, Communications and Society Program One Dupont Circle, NW. Available at www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/cands/Civic_Engagement_on_the_Move.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Internet World Stats. 2011. Internet Users in Africa. Retrieved 18 February 2012 from www.internetworldstats.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. OECD/ITU. 2011. M-Government: Mobile Technologies for Responsive Governments and Connected Societies. OECD Publishing. Retrieved 12 February 2012 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264118706-en. Also available at ITU (International Telecommunication Union) Bookshop at www.itu.int/pub/D-STR/m-gov.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-khamayseh, S., E. Lawrence, & A. Zmijewska. 2006. Towards Understanding Success Factors in Interactive Mobile Government. In the Proceedings of Euro mGov, available at http://www.mgovernment.org/resurces/euromgvo2006/PDF/2_Al-Khamayseh.pdf {Accessed 3 12 2011}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Antovski, L. & Gusev. M. 2005. M-Government Framework, in EURO mGOV 2005 "From e-government to m-government". 2005. Brighton: Mobile Government Consortium International.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Alijerban, M. & Saghafi. F. 2010. M-government maturity model with technological approach. In New Trends in Information Science and Service Science (NISS), 2010 4th International Conference on. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Simic, K., Dadic, J., Paunovic, L., Milutinovic, M. & Bogdanovic, Z. 2012. Delivering mobile government services through cloud computing. Innovative Issues and Approaches in Social Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 2, May 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Le Roux, C. J. B & Evans, N. 2010. Can Cloud Computing Bridge the Digital Divide in South African Secondary Education? In Proceedings of 6th International Conference on e-Government. Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, 30 September -- 1 October 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Borgman, H., Heier, H., & Bahli, B. 2012 Cloudrise: Opportunities and Challenges for IT Governance at the Dawn of Cloud Computing. In Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (CD-ROM), 45, Computer Society Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. NIST. 2009. US Federal Cloud Computing Initiative RFQ (GSA). National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Government.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sultan, N. 2013. Knowledge management in the age of cloud computing and Web 2.0: Experiencing the power of disruptive innovations. International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 160--165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Mitrovic, Z. 2010. Preventing duplication of e-government related small business development services: Servicing Participation. In Proceedings of 6th International Conference on e-Government. Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, 30 September -- 1 October 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mitrovic, Z. & Klaas, N. 2012. The perceived benefits of introducing m-government services in the Western Cape. In Proceedings of 14th Annual Conference on World Wide Web Applications (ZA-WWW2012), 7 - 9 November 2012, Durban.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Matavire, R., Chigona, W., Roode, D., Sewchurran, E., Davids, Z., Mukudu, A. & Boamah-Abu, C. 2010 Challenges of eGovernment Project Implementation in a South African Context. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation Volume 13 Issue 2 2010, (pp153--164).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Maxwell, W. & Wolf, C. 2012 A Global Reality: Governmental Access to Data in the Cloud - A comparative analysis of ten international jurisdictions, A Hogan Lovells White Paper, retrieved on 6 May 2013 from http://m.hoganlovells.com/files/News/c6edc1e2-d57b-402e-9cab-a7be4e004c59/Presentation/NewsAttachment/a17af284-7d04-4008-b557-5888433b292d/Revised%20Government%20Access%20to%20Cloud%20Data%20Paper%20(18%20July%2012).pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Misuraca, G. 2009 Futuring e-Government: governance and policy implications. International Symposium on Connected Governance: Vision or Reality?", Rome, SSPA, 21-22 October 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Bytheway, A. 2004. Information Management Body of Knowledge (IMBOK). Cape Technikon, Cape Town; Source: www.imbok.org; Accessed: 5 October 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Camacho, K.2001. The Internet: A Tool for Social Change? Elements of a Necessary Discussion. Working Paper for the Project Evaluation of the Social Impact of the Internet in Central America: The Case of Civil Society Organizations, January 2001. http://www.acceso.or.cr/publica/socialchange.shtmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Surman, M. 2001. From Access to Applications. Ontario Ministry of Citizenship. Available at http://www.volunteersonline.ca/news/environmentalscan.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Surman, M. & Reilly, K. 2003 Appropriating the Internet for Social Change: Towards the strategic use of networked technologies by transnational civil society organizations. Social Science Research Council. Available at http://www.ssrc.org/programs/itic/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumar, M. & Sinha, O. P. 2007)M-Government -- Mobile Technology for e-Government. In International conference on e-government, India, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. RAPID. 2010. The Research and Policy in Development. Retrieved 7 May 2010 from www.odi.org.uk/programmes/rapid.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ward, C. 2009. Cloud Computing, Mobile Governance and Web 2.0 technologies. In Conference Proceedings Report, The Society for Promotion of e-Governance.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Cranston, P. 2009 The potential of mobile devices in wireless environments to provide e-services for positive social and economic change in rural communities. CTA, October 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Rannu, R., Saksing, S. & Mahlakõiv, T. 2010. Mobile Government: 2010 and Beyond. Working document, Mobi Solutions, Ltd., January 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Alijerban, M. & Saghafi. F. 2010. M-government maturity model with technological approach. In New Trends in Information Science and Service Science (NISS), 2010 4th International Conference on. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Georgiadis, C. K. & Stiakakis, E. 2010 Extending an e-Government Service Measurement Framework to m-Governement Services. In Mobile Business and 2010 Ninth Global Mobility Roundtable (ICMB-GMR), 2010 Ninth International Conference on. 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Samarajiva, R. 2010 e-Governance using mobile platform. This work was carried out with the aid of a grant from the International Development Research Centre, Canada and the Department for International Development, UK. Available at https://www.google.co.za/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&ved=0CEIQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Flirneasia.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F04%2FBhatnagar_RS.pdf&ei=rMLWUcTfC9C4hAfhhYGQAg&usg=AFQjCNGInahyIamcBqwmIA6Ajd7rfsb3_w&sig2=Pa5FDYPNFhKi04zrVylr_g&bvm=bv.48705608,d.ZG4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Hellang, Ø., Flak, L. S & Päivärinta, T. 2012) Methods for realizing benefits from ICT in the Norwegian public sector: A comparison,tGov2012. Brunel University, University Kingdom, May 8th -- 9th 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Harrison, T. M., Pardo, T. A. & Cook, M. 2012. Creating Open Government Ecosystem: A Research and Development Agenda. Future Internet 2012, 4, 900--928.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Yu, h. & Robinson, G. D. 2012 The New Ambiguity of "Open Government". UCLA L. REV. DISC. 178 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Mitrovic, Z & Klass, N.2013. The perceived benefits of introducing Cloud Computing based m-government services in the Western Cape. Accepted by 15th Annual Conference on World Wide Web Applications (ZA-WWW2013), Cape Peninsula University of Technology September 10 - 13, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Benefits of introducing the cloud computing based m-government in the western cape: policy implications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEGOV '13: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
      October 2013
      398 pages
      ISBN:9781450324564
      DOI:10.1145/2591888
      • Editors:
      • Tomasz JANOWSKI,
      • Jeanne HOLM,
      • Elsa ESTEVEZ

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 October 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader