skip to main content
10.1145/2592235.2592246acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschinese-chiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Developing a serious game for cognitive assessment: choosing settings and measuring performance

Published:26 April 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Gamification and serious games are becoming increasingly important for training, wellness, and other applications. How can games be developed for non-traditional gaming populations such as the elderly, and how can gaming be applied in non-traditional areas such as cognitive assessment? The application that we were interested in is detection of cognitive impairment in the elderly. Example use cases where gamified cognitive assessment might be useful are: prediction of delirium onset risk in emergency departments and postoperative hospital wards; evaluation of recovery from stroke in neuro-rehabilitation; monitoring of transitions from mild cognitive impairment to dementia in long-term care. With the rapid increase in cognitive disorders in many countries, inexpensive methods of measuring cognitive status on an ongoing basis, and to large numbers of people, are needed. In order to address this challenge we have developed a novel game-based method of cognitive assessment. In this paper, we present findings from a usability study conducted on the game that we developed for measuring changes in cognitive status. We report on the game's ability to predict cognitive status under varying game parameters, and we introduce a method to calibrate the game that takes into account differences in speed and accuracy, and in motor coordination. Recommendations concerning the development of serious games for cognitive assessment are made, and detailed recommendations concerning future development of the whack-a-mole game are also provided.

References

  1. Baddeley, A. Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature reviews. Neuroscience 4, 10 (Oct. 2003), 829--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barua, P., Bilder, R., Small, A., & Sharma, T. Standardisation Study of Cogtest. Schizophrenia Bulletin 31, 2 (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergman Nutley, S., Söderqvist, S., Bryde, S., Thorell, L. B., Humphreys, K., and Klingberg, T. Gains in fluid intelligence after training non-verbal reasoning in 4-year-old children: a controlled, randomized study. Developmental science 14, 3 (May 2011), 591--601.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Christ, S. E., White, D. A., Mandernach, T., and Keys, B. A. Inhibitory control across the life span. Developmental neuropsychology 20, 3 (Jan. 2001), 653--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Diamond, A. Executive functions. Annual review of psychology 64 (Jan. 2013), 135--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Elliott, R. Executive functions and their disorders. British Medical Bulletin 65, 1 (Mar. 2003), 49--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Gamberini, L., Martino, F., Seraglia, B., Spagnolli, A., Fabregat, M., Ibanez, F., Alcaniz, M., and Andres, J. M. Eldergames project: An innovative mixed reality table-top solution to preserve cognitive functions in elderly people. In 2009 2nd Conference on Human System Interactions, IEEE (May 2009), 164--169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Harwood, D. M., Hope, T., and Jacoby, R. Cognitive impairment in medical inpatients. II: Do physicians miss cognitive impairment? Age and ageing 26, 1 (Jan. 1997), 37--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacova, C., Kertesz, A., Blair, M., Fisk, J. D., and Feldman, H. H. Neuropsychological testing and assessment for dementia. Alzheimer's & dementia: the journal of the Alzheimer's Association 3, 4 (Oct. 2007), 299--317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Johnson, J. K., Lui, L.-Y., and Yaffe, K. Executive Function, More Than Global Cognition, Predicts Functional Decline and Mortality in Elderly Women. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 62, 10 (Oct. 2007), 1134--1141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kahneman, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kosslyn, E. E. S.. S. M. Cognitive Psychology. Prentice Hall, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Miyake, A., and Friedman, N. P. The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions. Current directions in psychological science 21, 1 (Feb. 2012), 8--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Mizobuchi, S., Chignell, M., Suzuki, J., Koga, K., and Nawa, K. The Impact of Central Executive Function Loadings on Driving-Related Performance. In Adjunct Proceedings of AutomotiveUI'12 (2012), 68--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., and Chertkow, H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 4 (Apr. 2005), 695--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Osman, A., Lou, L., Muller-Gethmann, H., Rinkenauer, G., Mattes, S., and Ulrich, R. Mechanisms of speed-accuracy tradeoff: evidence from covert motor processes. Biological psychology 51, 2-3 (Jan. 2000), 173--99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Richmond, L. L., Morrison, A. B., Chein, J. M., and Olson, I. R. Working memory training and transfer in older adults. Psychology and aging 26, 4 (Dec. 2011), 813--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Robbins, T. W., James, M., Owen, A. M., Sahakian, B. J., McInnes, L., and Rabbitt, P. Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB): a factor analytic study of a large sample of normal elderly volunteers. Dementia (Basel, Switzerland) 5, 5, 266--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Salthouse, T. A. What cognitive abilities are involved in trail-making performance? Intelligence 39, 4 (Jan. 2011), 222--232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Saxena, S., and Lawley, D. Delirium in the elderly: a clinical review. Postgraduate medical journal 85, 1006 (Aug. 2009), 405--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Scott Mackenzie, S. X. Z. An empirical investigation of the novice experience with soft keyboards. Behaviour & Information Technology 20 (2001), 411--418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Smith, P. J., Attix, D. K., Weldon, B. C., Greene, N. H., and Monk, T. G. Executive function and depression as independent risk factors for postoperative delirium. Anesthesiology 110, 4 (Apr. 2009), 781--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Strömberg, L., Lindgren, U., Nordin, C., Öhlén, G., and Svensson, O. The Appearance and Disappearance of Cognitive Impairment in Elderly Patients During Treatment for Hip Fracture. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 11, 3 (Sept. 1997), 167--175.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Woodford, H. J., and George, J. Cognitive assessment in the elderly: a review of clinical methods. QJM: monthly journal of the Association of Physicians 100, 8 (Aug. 2007), 469--84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Developing a serious game for cognitive assessment: choosing settings and measuring performance

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Other conferences
                Chinese CHI '14: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium of Chinese CHI
                April 2014
                120 pages
                ISBN:9781450328760
                DOI:10.1145/2592235
                • Conference Chairs:
                • Ellen Yi-Luen Do,
                • Wei Li

                Copyright © 2014 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 26 April 2014

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate17of40submissions,43%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader