skip to main content
10.1145/2597073.2597106acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

How does a typical tutorial for mobile development look like?

Published:31 May 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We report on an exploratory study, which aims at understanding how development tutorials are structured, what types of tutorials exist, and how official tutorials differ from tutorials written by development communities. We analyzed over 1.200 tutorials for mobile application development provided by six different sources for the three major platforms: Android, Apple iOS, and Windows Phone. We found that a typical tutorial contains around 2700 words distributed over 4 pages and including a list of instructions with 18 items. Overall, 70% of the tutorials contain source code examples and a similar fraction contain images. On average, one tutorial has 6 images. When analyzing the images, we found that the studied iOS community posted the largest number of images, 14 images per tutorial, on average, from which 74% are plain images, i.e., mainly screenshots without stencils, diagrams, or highlights. In contrast, 36% of the images included in the official tutorials by Apple were diagrams or images with stencils. Community sites seem to follow a similar structure to the official sites but include items and images which are rather underrepresented in the official tutorials. From the analysis of the tutorials content by means of natural language processing combined with manual content analysis, we derived four categories for mobile development tutorials: infrastructure and design, application and services, distribution and maintenance, and development platform. Our categorization can help tutorial writers to better organize and evaluate the content of their tutorials and identify missing tutorials.

References

  1. L. Bergman, V. Castelli, T. Lau, and D. Oblinger. Docwizards: a system for authoring follow-me documentation wizards. In In Proc. ACM UIST, pages 191–200. ACM Press, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. Bird, A. Gourley, P. Devanbu, M. Gertz, and A. Swaminathan. Mining email social networks. In MSR’06, MSR ’06, pages 137–143, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 3:993–1022, Mar. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J. M. Carroll and M. B. Rosson. Paradox of the active user. In J. M. Carroll, editor, Interfacing thought: cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction, chapter Paradox of the active user, pages 80–111. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. B. Dagenais and M. P. Robillard. Creating and evolving developer documentation: Understanding the decisions of open source contributors. In SIGSOFT’10, pages 127–136, November 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. M. Harrison. A comparison of still, animated, or nonillustrated on-line help with written or spoken instructions in a graphical user interface. In SIGCHI ’95, CHI ’95, pages 82–89, New York, NY, USA, 1995. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. D. Herbsleb and E. Kuwana. Preserving knowledge in design projects: what designers need to know. In Proceedings of the Joint INTERACT ’93 and CHI ’93 Conferences on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 7–14, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Y. Jeong, Y. Xie, J. Beaton, B. A. Myers, J. Stylos, R. Ehret, J. Karstens, A. Efeoglu, and D. K. Busse. Improving documentation for eSOA APIs through user studies. In Proc. 2nd Int’l Symp. on End-User Development, volume 5435 of LNCS, pages 86–105. Springer, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Kelleher and R. Pausch. Stencils-based tutorials: design and evaluation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’05, pages 541–550, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. E. Knuth. Literate programming. Comput. J., 27(2):97–111, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. J. Ko, R. DeLine, and G. Venolia. Information needs in collocated software development teams. In ICSE ’07. IEEE Computer Society, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. W. Maalej and H.-J. Happel. Can development work describe itself? In MSR ’10. IEEE, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. W. Maalej and M. P. Robillard. Patterns of knowledge in api reference documentation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 39(9):1264–1282, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Mylopoulos, A. Borgida, and E. Yu. Representing software engineering knowledge. Automated Software Engineering, 4(3):291–317, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. K. Nørmark. Elucidative programming. Nordic J. of Computing, 7(2):87–105, June 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Nykaza, R. Messinger, F. Boehme, C. L. Norman, M. Mace, and M. Gordon. What programmers really want: Results of a needs assessment for SDK documentation. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual ACM SIGDOC International Conference on Computer Documentation, pages 133–141, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. Pagano and W. Maalej. How do open source communities blog? Empirical Software Engineering, pages 1–35, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. Pagano and W. Maalej. User feedback in the appstore: An empirical study. In RE, pages 125–134, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Palmiter and J. Elkerton. An evaluation of animated demonstrations of learning computer-based tasks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’91, pages 257–263, New York, NY, USA, 1991. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M. F. Porter. Readings in information retrieval. chapter An Algorithm for Suffix Stripping, pages 313–316. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. P. Robillard. What makes APIs hard to learn? Answers from developers. IEEE Software, 26(6):26–34, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. M. P. Robillard and R. DeLine. A field study of api learning obstacles. Empirical Software Engineering, 16(6):703–732, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. J. Singer, T. Lethbridge, N. Vinson, and N. Anquetil. An examination of software engineering work practices. In CASCON’97, page 21. IBM Press, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. T. Vestdam. Generating Consistent Program Tutorials, pages 55–70. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. R. Wallace, E. Soloway, J. Krajcik, N. Bos, J. Hoffman, H. E. Hunter, D. Kiskis, E. Klann, G. Peters, D. Richardson, and O. Ronen. Artemis: learner-centered design of an information seeking environment for k-12 education. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’98, pages 195–202, New York, NY, USA, 1998. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. S. Wasserman and K. Faust. Social network analysis: Methods and applications, volume 8. Cambridge university press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. How does a typical tutorial for mobile development look like?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MSR 2014: Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories
        May 2014
        427 pages
        ISBN:9781450328630
        DOI:10.1145/2597073
        • General Chair:
        • Premkumar Devanbu,
        • Program Chairs:
        • Sung Kim,
        • Martin Pinzger

        Copyright © 2014 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 31 May 2014

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Upcoming Conference

        ICSE 2025

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader