skip to main content
10.1145/2597073.2597129acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

FLOSS 2013: a survey dataset about free software contributors: challenges for curating, sharing, and combining

Published:31 May 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this data paper we describe a data set obtained by means of performing an on-line survey to over 2,000 Free Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) contributors. The survey includes questions related to personal characteristics (gender, age, civil status, nationality, etc.), education and level of English, professional status, dedication to FLOSS projects, reasons and motivations, involvement and goals. We describe as well the possibilities and challenges of using private information from the survey when linked with other, publicly available data sources. In this regard, an example of data sharing will be presented and legal, ethical and technical issues will be discussed.

References

  1. J. Bethlehem. How accurate are self-selection web surveys? Technical Report Discussion paper (08014), Statistics Netherlands, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. P. A. David, A. Waterman, and S. Arora. FLOSS-US: The Free/Libre/Open Source Software Survey for 2003. Technical report, Stanford Institute for Economic and Policy Research, Stanford, USA, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. A. Ghosh, G. Robles, and R. Glott. Software source code survey (free/libre and open source software: Survey and study). Technical report, Univ. of Maastricht, The Netherlands, June 2002. http://www.flossproject.org/report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. N. Li, T. Li, and S. Venkatasubramanian. t-closeness: Privacy beyond k-anonymity and l-diversity. In ICDE, volume 7, pages 106–115, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. A. Machanavajjhala, D. Kifer, J. Gehrke, and M. Venkitasubramaniam. l-diversity: Privacy beyond k-anonymity. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), 1(1):3, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. P. Ohm. Broken promises of privacy: Responding to the surprising failure of anonymization. UCLA Law Review, 57(6), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. P. Puhani. The Heckman correction for sample selection and its critique. Journal of economic surveys, 14(1):53–68, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. H. Shimizu, J. Iio, and K. Hiyane. The realities of Free/Libre/Open Source Software developers in Japan and Asia. First Monday, 9(11), 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L. Sweeney. k-anonymity: A model for protecting privacy. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 10(05):557–570, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. Vasilescu, A. Capiluppi, and A. Serebrenik. Gender, representation and online participation: A quantitative study. Interacting with Computers, page iwt047, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. B. Vasilescu, V. Filkov, and A. Serebrenik. StackOverflow and GitHub: Associations between software development and crowdsourced knowledge. In Proceedings 2013 Intl Conf on Social Computing, pages 188–195. IEEE, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. H.-Y. Wang and Y.-S. Wang. Gender differences in the perception and acceptance of online games. British Journal of Educational Tech, 39(5):787–806, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. FLOSS 2013: a survey dataset about free software contributors: challenges for curating, sharing, and combining

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MSR 2014: Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories
      May 2014
      427 pages
      ISBN:9781450328630
      DOI:10.1145/2597073
      • General Chair:
      • Premkumar Devanbu,
      • Program Chairs:
      • Sung Kim,
      • Martin Pinzger

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 31 May 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Upcoming Conference

      ICSE 2025

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader