skip to main content
10.1145/2598394.2609846acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
technical-note

A template for designing single-solution hybrid metaheuristics

Published:12 July 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Single-solution metaheuristics are among the earliest and most successful metaheuristics, with many variants appearing in the literature. Even among the most popular variants, there is a large degree of overlap in terms of actual behavior. Moreover, in the case of hybrids of different metaheuristics, traditional names do not actually reflect how the hybrids are composed. In this paper, we discuss a template for single-solution hybrid metaheuristics. Our template builds upon the Paradiseo-MO framework, but restricts itself to a pre-defined structure based on iterated local search (ILS). The flexibility is given by generalizing the components of ILS (perturbation, local search and acceptance criterion) in order to incorporate components from other metaheuristics. We give precise definitions of these components within the context of our proposed template. The template proposed is flexible enough to reproduce many classical single-solution metaheuristics and hybrids thereof, while at the same time being sufficiently concrete to generate code from a grammar description in order to support automatic design of algorithms. We give examples of three IG-VNS hybrids that can be instantiated from the proposed template.

References

  1. H.-G. Beyer and H.-P. Schwefel. Evolution stratagies: a comprehensive introduction. Natural Computing, 1: 3--52, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. Hansen and N. Mladenovic. Variable neighborhood search: Principles and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 130 (3): 449--467, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. H. H. Hoos and T. Stützle. Stochastic Local Search - Foundations and Applications. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Humeau, A. Liefooghe, E.-G. Talbi, and S. Verel. ParadisEO-MO: From fitness landscape analysis to efficient local search algorithms. Journal of Heuristics, 19 (6): 881--915, June 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. S. Hussin and T. Stützle. Hierarchical iterated local search for the quadratic assignment problem. In M. J. Blesa et al., editors, Hybrid Metaheuristics, volume 5818 of LNCS, pages 115--129. Springer, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Kirkpatrick, C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220: 671--680, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. H. R. Lourenço, O. Martin, and T. Stützle. Iterated local search. In F. Glover and G. Kochenberger, editors, Handbook of Metaheuristics, pages 321--353. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M.-E. Marmion, F. Mascia, M. López-Ibáñez, and T. Stützle. Automatic design of hybrid stochastic local search algorithms. In M. J. Blesa et al., editors, Hybrid Metaheuristics, volume 7919 of LNCS, pages 144--158. Springer, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. D. Pisinger and S. Ropke. Large neighborhood search. In M. Gendreau and J.-Y. Potvin, editors, Handbook of Metaheuristics, volume 146 of International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, pages 399--419. Springer, New York, NY, 2 edition, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. R. Ruiz and T. Stützle. A simple and effective iterated greedy algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 177 (3): 2033--2049, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. G. Schrimpf, J. Schneider, H. Stamm-Wilbrandt, and G. Dueck. Record breaking optimization results using the ruin and recreate principle. Journal of Computational Physics, 159 (2): 139--171, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Swan, E. Özcan, and G. Kendall. Hyperion - a recursive hyper-heuristic framework. In C. A. Coello Coello, editor, Learning and Intelligent Optimization, 5th International Conference, LION 5, volume 6683 of LNCS, pages 616--630. Springer, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. J. Swan, J. Woodward, E. Özcan, G. Kendall, and E. Burke. Searching the hyper-heuristic design space. Cognitive Computation, 6 (1): 66--73, Mar. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. R. J. M. Vaessens, E. H. L. Aarts, and J. K. Lenstra. A local search template. Computers & Operations Research, 25 (11): 969--979, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A template for designing single-solution hybrid metaheuristics

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          GECCO Comp '14: Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation
          July 2014
          1524 pages
          ISBN:9781450328814
          DOI:10.1145/2598394

          Copyright © 2014 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 12 July 2014

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • technical-note

          Acceptance Rates

          GECCO Comp '14 Paper Acceptance Rate180of544submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

          Upcoming Conference

          GECCO '24
          Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
          July 14 - 18, 2024
          Melbourne , VIC , Australia

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader