skip to main content
10.1145/2600057.2602900acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A general volume-parameterized market making framework

Published:01 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

We introduce a framework for automated market making for prediction markets, the volume parameterized market (VPM), in which securities are priced based on the market maker's current liabilities as well as the total volume of trade in the market. We provide a set of mathematical tools that can be used to analyze markets in this framework, and show that many existing market makers (including cost-function based markets [Chen and Pennock 2007; Abernethy et al. 2011, 2013], profit-charging markets [Othman and Sandholm 2012], and buy-only markets [Li and Vaughan 2013]) all fall into this framework as special cases. Using the framework, we design a new market maker, the perspective market, that satisfies four desirable properties (worst-case loss, no arbitrage, increasing liquidity, and shrinking spread) in the complex market setting, but fails to satisfy information incorporation. However, we show that the sacrifice of information incorporation is unavoidable: we prove an impossibility result showing that any market maker that prices securities based only on the trade history cannot satisfy all five properties simultaneously. Instead, we show that perspective markets may satisfy a weaker notion that we call center-price information incorporation.

References

  1. ABERNETHY, J., CHEN, Y., AND VAUGHAN, J. W. 201 An optimization-based framework for automated market-making. In ACM EC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. ABERNETHY, J., CHEN, Y., AND VAUGHAN, J. W. 2013. Efficient market making via convex optimization, and a connection to online learning. ACM TEAC 1, 2. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. BERG, J. E., FORSYTHE, R., NELSON, F. D., AND RIETZ, T. A. 2001. Results from a dozen years of election futures markets research. In Handbook of Experimental Economic Results, C. A. Plott and V. Smith, Eds.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. CHEN, Y. AND PENNOCK, D. 2007. A utility framework for bounded-loss market makers. In UAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. FORSYTHE, R., NELSON, F., NEUMANN, G. R., AND WRIGHT, J. 1992. Anatomy of an experimental political stock market. The American Economic Review, 1142--1161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. HANSON, R. 2003. Combinatorial information market design. Information Systems Frontiers 5, 1, 105--119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. LEDYARD, J., HANSON, R., AND ISHIKIDA, T. 2009. An experimental test of combinatorial information markets. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 69, 182--189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. LI, X. AND VAUGHAN, J. W. 2013. An axiomatic characterization of adaptive-liquidity market makers. In ACM EC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. MALKIEL, B. G. AND FAMA, E. F. 1970. Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work*. The journal of Finance 25, 2, 383--417.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. OTHMAN, A. AND SANDHOLM, T. 2011. Liquidity-sensitive automated market makers via homogeneous risk measures. WINE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. OTHMAN, A. AND SANDHOLM, T. 2012. Profit-charging market makers with bounded loss, vanishing bid/ask spreads, and unlimited market depth. In ACM EC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. PENNOCK, D. M. 2010. Why automated market makers' Oddhead Blog. Accessed at http: //blog.oddhead.com/2010/07/08/why-automated-market-makers/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. ROCKAFELLAR, R. 1997. Convex analysis. Vol. 28. Princeton Univ Pr.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. WOLFERS, J. AND ZITZEWITZ, E. 2004. Prediction markets. Journal of Economic Perspective 18, 2, 107--126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A general volume-parameterized market making framework

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      EC '14: Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM conference on Economics and computation
      June 2014
      1028 pages
      ISBN:9781450325653
      DOI:10.1145/2600057

      Copyright © 2014 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 June 2014

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      EC '14 Paper Acceptance Rate80of290submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate664of2,389submissions,28%

      Upcoming Conference

      EC '24
      The 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
      July 8 - 11, 2024
      New Haven , CT , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader